What a weak man, all we can do is pray.

you people are miseducated and stupid.

Projection.

the Christian teaching is the Christian church became israel.

Nonsensical word salad.

dispensationalism and the continued maintenance of separate covenants is a fraud and a fictin invented by John Nelson Darby and spread through Christianity by the Scofield education Bible.

Loony tunes.

and it;s also combines a necessity for military action with chrstianity to defend some random nation and its fucked up and stupid.

More moronic meanderings with little meaning.

my god is not a racist war psychotic.

Apparently you also don't know that God is always capitalized. What a brainless heretic. :laugh:

you're with demons.

Projection.
 
Projection.



Nonsensical word salad.



Loony tunes.



More moronic meanderings with little meaning.



Apparently you also don't know that God is always capitalized. What a brainless heretic. :laugh:



Projection.
yes.

you are using Into the night's strategy of pretending you can't read.

It's not effective.

I have saved christianity from the clutches of demons.

you're welcome.
 
That is 75% PER pound. Take that $3 increase and X it by 2.5 lbs that is a $7.50 increase per 42 oz can well it went up more then that because as I have said many times before Retailers will and a few percent to the increased price to pad their bottom line.
YOU forgot to add in there Trumps tariffs , what was it 100% on Columbia and Brazil.
Actually, it works out to a 57% increase, not 75%.

Previous price: $4 x 2.5lbs. = $10
New price: $7 x 2.5lbs. = $17.5

10 / 17.5 = .571 or 57%.

Since virtually all grocery retailers have a margin of 1 to 2% on a product--let's use 1.5--the increase in profit per 2.5lbs. can sold is

17.5 x .015 -10 x .015 = .11 or 11 cents. In round numbers 26 cents - 15 cents.
 
Hear that, all the FBI can do is pray for the victims. They cannot possibly try to catch the criminal. :palm:
The unadulterated convenience of being a liberal must be so very nice. You alternate between fawning over criminals while demonizing victims and fawning over victims while demonizing criminals at the drop of a hat.
 
@Jarod, you have only one job, i.e. explain why you need to force law-abiding citizens into defenselessness before violent crime.

Until you do, your "common sense" abolition of the 2nd Amendment is dismissed.
Not asking to force law-abiding citizens into defenselessness. You are confused.
 
Sure there are other things to ballance, other rights.

So, you believe inmates in a supermax should have access to arms?

According to you libturds, there is no balancing 1st. Amendment rights.

Who said that? Projecting a bit, aren't you? Incarceration removes many rights. Duh!

BTW, there's only one l in balance!
 
According to you libturds, there is no balancing 1st. Amendment rights.

Who said that? Projecting a bit, aren't you? Incarceration removes many rights. Duh!

BTW, there's only one l in balance!
Sure there is a balancing of all rights, when they conflict with other rights.
 
Not asking to force law-abiding citizens into defenselessness.
Yes, you most certainly are. You have only one job and you are failing at it. Until you explain why you need to force law-abiding citizens into defenselessness before violent crime, all of your dismantling of the 2nd Amendment is discarded with extreme prejudice.
 
Yes, you most certainly are. You have only one job and you are failing at it. Until you explain why you need to force law-abiding citizens into defenselessness before violent crime, all of your dismantling of the 2nd Amendment is discarded with extreme prejudice.
Not doing so.
 
Back
Top