A second thought about Iraq.

T

theMAJORITY

MAJORITYrules-sorry
Ya know folks--I might be starting to think Bush had a point with going into Iraq.--Let me explain my thought.


Think about the world situation--it is very dynamic right now. Several countries, with the thought of a one world order (a result of power hungry socialism/communisum--might I add) are jockying in position to be the boss. The USA is one of them--Russia is another, North Korea and China are there--even countryless Al-beheada is trying to take over the world.

Now--lets go into the future, knowing Saddam was a tyrant, who ruled his people like a bull dyke on a fem dyke--but he killed them. Would leaving that region alone-to flurish evil that hates us (because we are free to get good lifestyles and get fat or even be a homo "which they kill" if we want IMO), in a dynamic world, be a great idea?

With the world dynamics (this is just a question to spurr thought), was it the worst idea to try to make one area of that hostile region a democratic society?

I know--they have their sovernty--but the people did not, they lived 100% oppressed.--Only Saddam did and his family had control--and he was a threat to us in not so direct ways.

Remember--when your kids (or watermark) were watching saturday morning cartoons---his kids were gutting goats alive--to learn to love the terror in their dying eyes to impose it on their enemys in the future.

If that mentality becomes a threat to us in a grand scale--we have a problem.

Getting (even by force) democracy in that region may not be a terrible idea--and the people will like it much better, I am sure. What can be worse?

OK--Obama--right--I agree.

Liberials--think about this before you react.
 
Dixie said:
Don't count on it. Every point you made, has been made countless times, they don't care!
Click to expand...

Shit--and I thought I made it all up.

Shit just does not hit close enough to their home I guess. Nice rich liberial White (but they care about the blacks) neighborhoods--out of touch with any reality but the hollywood like orgy in Europe during their "worldy travels". Soooooo sophisticated maaaaaaan

Fucking white trash!!!

Oooo--sorry--intellectual white trash--my big mistake.
 
Last edited:
theMAJORITY said:
Shit--and I thought I made it all up.

Shit just does not hit close enough to their home I guess. Nice rich liberial White (but they care about the blacks) neighborhoods--out of touch with any reality but the hollywood like orgy in Europe during their "worldy travels". Soooooo sophisticated maaaaaaan

Fucking white trash!!!

Oooo--sorry--intellectual white trash--my big mistake.
Click to expand...

I think Waterhead gave it away in his Antisemitic post. Like our enemies, they hate the Jews. They opposed Iraq because they wanted alQaeda to establish a foothold there, in order to annihilate the Jews. You see, liberals are a bunch of cowardly fucks, who wouldn't pick up a gun and do the job themselves, they need to enable alQaeda to do their dirty work, so they can remain 'above it all' and 'intellectual' about it.
 
theMAJORITY said:
Ya know folks--I might be starting to think Bush had a point with going into Iraq.--Let me explain my thought.


Think about the world situation--it is very dynamic right now. Several countries, with the thought of a one world order (a result of power hungry socialism/communisum--might I add) are jockying in position to be the boss. The USA is one of them--Russia is another, North Korea and China are there--even countryless Al-beheada is trying to take over the world.

Now--lets go into the future, knowing Saddam was a tyrant, who ruled his people like a bull dyke on a fem dyke--but he killed them. Would leaving that region alone-to flurish evil that hates us (because we are free to get good lifestyles and get fat or even be a homo "which they kill" if we want IMO), in a dynamic world, be a great idea?

With the world dynamics (this is just a question to spurr thought), was it the worst idea to try to make one area of that hostile region a democratic society?

I know--they have their sovernty--but the people did not, they lived 100% oppressed.--Only Saddam did and his family had control--and he was a threat to us in not so direct ways.

Remember--when your kids (or watermark) were watching saturday morning cartoons---his kids were gutting goats alive--to learn to love the terror in their dying eyes to impose it on their enemys in the future.

If that mentality becomes a threat to us in a grand scale--we have a problem.

Getting (even by force) democracy in that region may not be a terrible idea--and the people will like it much better, I am sure. What can be worse?

OK--Obama--right--I agree.

Liberials--think about this before you react.
Click to expand...

Well let's see...in order to have a second thought you must have a first thought....this qualifies as neither. This is purely the ramblings of a delusional wingnut.

Sympton #1 of Wingnut paranoia. Fear of some make believe and mythical "one world order" what ever the hell that is.

Symptom #2. Paranoia of a defunct and discredited political system called communism.

Symptom #3. An irrational knee jerk reaction to call any who actually practices freedom a communist.

Symptom #4. The delusion that some petty third world dictator is actually a threat to our national security while ignoring a group that is.
 
Last edited:
Dixie said:
Don't count on it. Every point you made, has been made countless times, they don't care!
Click to expand...

And it's been discredited just as many. Invading Iraq based upon lying and misleading the American public was an insanely immoral act and the most disastrous foreign policy fuck up in American history. The people who supported the invasion are morally culpable for the tens of thousands of lives lost there and the hundreds of billions of dollars wasted.
 
Dixie said:
I think Waterhead gave it away in his Antisemitic post. Like our enemies, they hate the Jews. They opposed Iraq because they wanted alQaeda to establish a foothold there, in order to annihilate the Jews. You see, liberals are a bunch of cowardly fucks, who wouldn't pick up a gun and do the job themselves, they need to enable alQaeda to do their dirty work, so they can remain 'above it all' and 'intellectual' about it.
Click to expand...

Get help.
 
Dixie said:
I think Waterhead gave it away in his Antisemitic post. Like our enemies, they hate the Jews. They opposed Iraq because they wanted alQaeda to establish a foothold there, in order to annihilate the Jews. You see, liberals are a bunch of cowardly fucks, who wouldn't pick up a gun and do the job themselves, they need to enable alQaeda to do their dirty work, so they can remain 'above it all' and 'intellectual' about it.
Click to expand...

I love it when Dixie opens up this part of his psyche to the board.

What a complete loon.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top