A Winter Chill In August - A Resurgent Russia in the Near Abroad

The Bare Knuckled Pundit

Grand Inquisitor
One of the intentions behind Russia’s ongoing revisionist aggression in Georgia was to send a message to its former republics and vassals in what it considers to be its’ historical sphere of influence; particularly those gravitating towards a Western orientation and flirting with NATO. Having sent a message, one might naturally expect it to elicit a response.

While they have succeeded in spades, it is hardly the response Prime Minister Putin and the Kremlin had sought or imagined.

Instead of cowering in fear - with only the sound of chattering teeth to protest as Russian tanks mangled the meager Georgian defenses - those targeted for intimidation have instead stood defiantly against the belligerent Bear. Moreover, not satisfied to settle for mere words to register their defiance, their actions have left no doubt about their resolve and intentions.

Following the announcement on Friday of Poland’s agreement to host 10 American missile interceptors at a base on the Baltic coast, Ukraine offered a series of former Soviet missile early warning radar installations and space control systems for integration into Western missile defenses on Saturday.

Putting aside any possible misinterpretations of the Ukrainian offer, President Victor Yushchenko stated, “Only a collective security system will provide the highest international guarantees... that could prevent any actions like those which occurred in... South Ossetia.”

This followed reports that Kiev last week limited the freedom of movement of Russia’s Black Sea Fleet after ships based at Sevastopol in Ukraine's Crimean peninsula were deployed in conjunction with the Russian overland offensive against Georgia.

While the American-Polish interceptor agreement had been in the works for some time, the timing of the announcement in the midst of the ongoing Georgian crisis would appear to clearly signal on which side of the geopolitical fault line Poland sits.

As part of the agreement, Poland will receive 96 Patriot missiles to augment its air defense needs.

Responding in classic Brezhnev era crypto-Kremlin fashion, Russia's deputy chief of general staff, Gen Anatoly Nogovitsyn, said the US move "cannot go unpunished".

Nogovitsyn then went on to say that Russia's military doctrine sanctions the use of nuclear weapons "against the allies of countries having nuclear weapons if they in some way help them." “Poland, by deploying (the system) is exposing itself to a strike — 100 percent," the General concluded.

Moving beyond the West, the response of some of Russia’s former republics and traditional allies is telling. Normally verbose and unflinching in their support of Mother Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan have been uncharacteristically low-key in their response to the crisis in Georgia.

Supporting international calls for a cease-fire, the two former Russian republics have been careful not to offend the Bear lest they incur its wraith. At the same time, they and other former republics fear Russia will use the rationale of defending ethnic Russians within their borders as a pretext for action similar to its ongoing occupation and infrastructure-dismantling operations in Georgia.

In addition to openly questioning whether it should respect Ukraine’s territorial integrity along with ominous statements calling for the return of the Crimea back under Russian control, the Kremlin has been issuing passports to ethnic Russians in many of its former republics in the near abroad; thereby granting them citizenship. With growing numbers of its “citizens” living in its diminutive neighbors, Russia then declares it has a moral responsibility to oversee their interests and insure their protection; much the same rationale Nazi Germany used as the basis for its expansion into Czechoslovakia as well as its annexation of Austria.

This seeding-of-sovereignty-via-passport is similar to action taken in both Abkhazia and South Ossetia that exacerbated rising tensions prior to the current Georgian crisis earlier in the year.

Taken in conjunction with the cancelation of Russian Foreign Minister Segey Lavrov’s previously scheduled trip to Poland in response to the American-Polish missile interceptor agreement, it appears as if the Kremlin has waxed nostalgic for the bygone days of heavy-handed, reactionary Cold War diplomacy.

A cold front has roared out of the Russian heartland into Georgia and threatens to seize its neighbors in its’ icy grip. As the resulting unforeseen and ominous August chill descends on the international tableau, one wonders if this is merely a freak cold snap or the first signs of a long cold winter to come.

Bundle up, faithful readers; lest you fall frostbit in the midst of summer’s glory. Stay tuned for further updates as events warrant and temperatures drop precipitously.
 
Please pardon my ignorance (once again) but I do not understand the big picture here. Did the U.S. cause or create this issue with Georgia and Russia so as to start another cold war in which we can attempt to profit off of it? Is that the general idea?
 
Please pardon my ignorance (once again) but I do not understand the big picture here. Did the U.S. cause or create this issue with Georgia and Russia so as to start another cold war in which we can attempt to profit off of it? Is that the general idea?

Not in my estimation, though its currency appears to be gaining strength; at least among the good posters thus far.
 
Georgia is not the great innocent the media has been making it out to be.

They started the conflict by attacking Tsklinvani for not wanting to be part of Georgia and for feeling Georgia's president was a criminal on the take.

Russia is going to use this oppertunity to scare all other breakaway countries and the military industrial complex and their favorite party are creaming their jeans about the whole development.
 
Georgia is not the great innocent the media has been making it out to be.

They started the conflict by attacking Tsklinvani for not wanting to be part of Georgia and for feeling Georgia's president was a criminal on the take.

Russia is going to use this oppertunity to scare all other breakaway countries and the military industrial complex and their favorite party are creaming their jeans about the whole development.

So the Republican party is celebrating and having the big "O" because there can now be a Cold War Part II. And how do the Democrats feel about it?
 
Profit is all the matters.

To those who believe this war is a money generator.

This is why you vote R in this day and age. You are unable to see the connections.
 
Profit is all the matters.

To those who believe this war is a money generator.

This is why you vote R in this day and age. You are unable to see the connections.

Oh, ok. Thank you for clearing that up for me. So I don't want a stable globe where trade is free and economies can prosper I just want perpetual war all across the world?
 
Profit is all the matters.

To those who believe this war is a money generator.

This is why you vote R in this day and age. You are unable to see the connections.

You still haven't commented on how the Dem's feel about this Georgia Russia deal.
 
The only thing I wonder about is the US giving Russia a hard time.

Imagine us giving someone else a hard time about invading another country? At least in this case Georgia showed actual aggression, was close enough to do harm, and has done so in the past.

Its sorta hard to imagine the audacity it takes to condemn Russia.
 
The only thing I wonder about is the US giving Russia a hard time.

Imagine us giving someone else a hard time about invading another country? At least in this case Georgia showed actual aggression, was close enough to do harm, and has done so in the past.

Its sorta hard to imagine the audacity it takes to condemn Russia.

This is no more audacious than the hypocrisy of the Russians in "defending the right to self determination" of South Ossetia and Abkhazia. I would dare say there are a million+ Chechens that would atest to this fact.

Furthermore, I don't recall the US questioning the territorial integrity of its neighbors and openly calling for the absorption of their lands into the republic.

The same, however, cannot be said of Prime Minister Putin and his associates in the Kremlin.

Nor do I see Moscow negotiating with Tibilisi over a timeline for the complete withdraw of Russian forces and the return of sovereignty to Georgia as Washington is currently doing with Baghdad.

To suggest that there is moral equivalence between our actions in Iraq and Russia's aggression in Georgia is absurd.
 
Back
Top