ACORN Document Dumps
- Thread starter Damocles
- Start date
Annie
Not So Junior Member
And where is the MSM? Oh yeah, they don't like Breitbart's methods. Boo hoo. Reminds me of the stolen emails or say, the Pentagon Papers?
christiefan915
Catalyst
Maybe the so-called dump is still under investigation.
http://mediamatters.org/research/200911240035
Annie
Not So Junior Member
Media Matters is as unbiased as The National Review. Reading the comments though was amusing.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
lol....you just proved my point in the ariopo (sp?) thread about the sheriff...you are quick to convict him, yet slow to do so here....
thank you!
christiefan915
Catalyst
Media Matters is as unbiased as The National Review. Reading the comments though was amusing.
It's as biased to the left as Breitbart is to the right. That's why I'm waiting for more information before making a judgment.
What?
According to your post in the other thread, they haven't denied the fact that they dumped these documents so you shouldn't be waiting for anything.
They try to excuse dumping the documents by saying that they aren't needed for the current investigation, but I haven't seen any denial...
christiefan915
Catalyst
Your point is what, a rush to judgment?
I'm waiting for all the facts to be in on this and as far as arpaio, I'm waiting for him to issue a public denial that the Alma Chacon situation never happened.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
has acorn denied this?
christiefan915
Catalyst
Gotta run, I'll get back to this later.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
Here's the thing:
Regarding the corporate credit card: Corp card statements are usually turned over to the CFO of a company who determines what part of the statement the employee is responsible for out of their own pocket. Now since the blog you sourced cannot determine if ACORN (the corporation) picked up the entire tab...it boils down to sheer speculation and innuendo on this point.
As with the personal credit history: Even the blogger source cannot state straight out that chicanery is involved...again relying on speculation and innuendo.
Now the first two links essentially point out that Acorn is VERY politically motivated and bias regarding the Dem party. So that pretty much ends any claim by their management that they are just a voter registration group.
This "dump" pretty much means nothing if an IRS audit or Fed audit was coming, because if those were the ONLY records, the "gaps" would appear in other financial links that would automatically sink Acorn.
Personally, my money is on the review regarding the internal handling of the embezzlement by one brother and the pay back/demotion of the other. THAT, IMHO, should be the weak link that might put the kibosh on ACORN.
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
Media Matters is as unbiased as The National Review. Reading the comments though was amusing.
You need to read more carefully, because there is more FACT to the article than "comments".
Can Breibart provide proof that the "dumped" material was/is vital to the investigation, or is that just FOX hyped speculation?
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
How come they're not issuing denials, if they're innocent??
Isn't this enough proof that they're guilty??
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
FUCK THE POLICE
911 EVERY DAY
ACORN: the greatest Americans.
christiefan915
Catalyst
What I read is that Acorn dumped a bunch of documents that they admit should have been shredded. According to Breitbart, "BigGovernment.com has learned that not only did this document dump occur, but the documents in question were irresponsibly and brazenly dumped in a public dumpster, without considering laws and regulations as to how sensitive information should be treated."
And then Breitbart posted these sensitive documents all over the internet.
What the hell is wrong with these people? Why didn't they turn these sensitive documents over to the authorities, rather than sit on the info for almost two months and then post the sensitive documents on their website?
christiefan915
Catalyst
The material was "dumped", according to Breitbart, around the 9th of October. Given their claim that it's so vital to the investigation, why didn't then turn it over to the authorities immediately instead of posting it on the website six weeks later?
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
Good point! Neocons consistently leave themselves open when they go on these vendettas. Mind you, ACORN is going to get screwed because of that embezzlement thing...and they should. But the rest of the "death by innuendo and circumstantial evidence" bullhorn by the neocons is just that...bull.