All True, but...

Cancel7

Banned
his getting the chance to attack Iran first, is no small matter. Many thousands of lives are at stake.

I ended last year believing that the time for Impeachment had passed and I just wanted to look forward to this fuck getting out of office after the election. But I was wrong. Bush must be impeached.

The End of the Road for George W. Bush
by Chris Hedges

The Gilbert and Sullivan charade of statesmanship played out by George W. Bush and his enabler, Condoleezza Rice, as they wander the Middle East is a fitting end to seven years of misrule. Despots stripped of power are transformed from monsters into buffoons. And this is the metamorphosis that is eating away at the Bush presidency.

Bush stood in Jerusalem, uncomfortable and palpably bored. He mouthed platitudes about a peace settlement that mocked the humanitarian crisis he aided and abetted in Gaza, the rapacious land grab by Israel in the West Bank and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. The diminished George Bush, increasingly irrelevant at home and abroad, is fading into insignificance. A year from now one half expects to see him stand up at the next president’s inauguration and screech “I’m melting! I’m melting!” as he sinks into a puddle of slime. He will return, I expect, to his ranch, where he will be able to spend the rest of his life doing the only task for which he has shown any aptitude-cutting down brush with a chain saw.

He may yet rise again to torment us with an attack on Iran, condemning more innocents to slaughter. He and his cigar-smoking soul mate Ehud Olmert would like to go out with one more flash of mayhem and violence. But even this will not ultimately save him. Bush will soon be reduced to the cipher he once was, left to spend the rest of his life trying to salvage a legacy of shame and deceit. In a just world he would be put on trial, if not by the International Criminal Court of Justice then by the U.S. Congress. He would be forced to face up to his lies and wars of aggression. But the moral rot that infects the nation has seeped into the bowels of the legislative as well as the executive branch.

World leaders, including those whom Bush desperately wants to intimidate, now dismiss him. Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said a few days ago that relations with the United States are of “no benefit to the Iranian nation. The day such relations are of benefit, I will be the first one to approve of that.”

Bush will have flown from Israel to Palestine to Kuwait to Bahrain to the United Arab Emirates to Saudi Arabia to Egypt in search of a legacy, one that he hopes will lift up his name in history. But, isolated and deluded, he has yet to grasp that he and the United States are reviled and detested for our violence, arrogance and greed. The bands played on the tarmac. He was toasted at state dinners. But even our allies, including Kuwait and Egypt, know Bush is a danger to himself and others.

He publicly displayed his inability to connect rhetoric with reality. He promised peace and cooperation, a new era, a Palestinian homeland. He promised solutions that will arise from negotiations that do not exist. Negotiations, in his eyes, are always about to begin. They were about to begin a year ago. They were about to begin with Annapolis. They are about to begin now. The messy issues between the Israelis and Palestinians that he and his administration have never attempted to address-the borders, the expanding Jewish settlements and outposts, the plight of Palestinian refugees and Jerusalem-will all be seamlessly solved … one day. But the brutal reality of the Israeli occupation barrels forward. The Jewish settlements and outposts continue to be expanded. The crisis in Gaza, with the cuts in fuel and electricity, the deadly army incursions and airstrikes, has turned the world’s largest walled prison into a swamp of human misery. And huge new settlements, like Har Homa, continue to rise up on Palestinian soil.

When Bush met with the Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas in Ramallah he blithely defended the patchwork of Israeli roadblocks that have turned the West Bank into a series of ringed Palestinian ghettos. The roadblocks, he told Abbas, are necessary for Israeli security. He announced that the 1949 Green Line, the borders established by the United Nations, would never be restored. There would be no discussion, he said, of the status of Jerusalem. And the plight of Palestinian refugees would be solved by setting up an international fund, meaning, of course, that none would ever return. In short, he offered an unequivocal endorsement of right-wing Israeli policy with not a murmur of dissent. And the Palestinians can either have it rammed down their throat or rot. Bush will be back, he has promised, in May to celebrate the 60th anniversary of the founding of the Jewish state. Olmert, no doubt, will again be fulsome in his praise, which is probably what Bush’s trip to the Middle East is, at its core, really about. Bush desperately wants someone to pretend with him that he is an agent for peace and statesmanship. Olmert, who knows the callow American leader will give him everything he desires, is happy to oblige.

But as Bush basks in the glow of his own fantasy, the suffering in Gaza, one of the world’s worst humanitarian disasters, along with the savage occupation of Iraq, continues to fuel widespread anger and rage. Bush has spent his time in office bolstering the Middle East’s most despotic regimes, including that of Gen. Hosni Mubarak in Egypt. He approved a $20-billion arms package for these states. He has backed efforts to crush mainstream Islamic groups that have electoral legitimacy and popular support. He has stood by as these regimes have stifled democratic dissent, and he has, with Israeli encouragement, isolated governments, even friendly governments, in the Middle East that raised feeble protests. But his day is past. There is open revolt. Opinion polls show that two-thirds of Palestinians, and three-fourths of Israelis, do not believe Bush can affect events in the Palestinian territories.

The agenda of the Bush White House is exposed as irrelevant, myopic and counterproductive. Most Arab countries are in open defiance of Washington and are actively reaching out to Iran.

“As long as they [Iran] have no nuclear program … why should we isolate Iran? Why punish Iran now?” Arab League Secretary-General Abu Moussa told The Washington Post.

The chief of the International Atomic Energy Agency, Mohamed ElBaradei, is in Iran for talks. President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad attended December’s Gulf Cooperation Council summit. The Iranian president attended the just-completed hajj in Mecca at the invitation of the Saudi monarch, King Abdullah. Tehran is exploring the resumption of diplomatic ties with Egypt, cut since the 1979 revolution, and has offered to cooperate with Cairo in the production of nuclear energy. And the Syrian and Lebanese governments have ignored Washington’s warnings to sever ties with Hezbollah and Hamas.

It is the end of the road for George Bush. The world takes less and less notice of him. He strutted and swaggered across the stage. He bellowed and raged. He plundered and murdered. And now he wants to be anointed as a peacemaker. His presidency, like his life, has been a tragic waste. But he at least he has a life. There are tens of thousands of mute graves in Gaza, Lebanon, Iraq and Afghanistan that stand as stark testaments to his true legacy. If he wants to redeem his time in office he should kneel before one and ask for forgiveness.

http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/01/14/6354/
 
That's a very well written article. That last paragraph nails it.

I truly believe Bush to be somewhat psychotic. He has a detachment from reality which is something that isn't a problem with, say, Britney Spears, but which is truly alarming in a President.

He also has a very casual disregard for life, and a weird view on war. He did tell a ghostwriter in the '90's that he didn't think a President could achieve "greatness" without a war.

What a twisted mind...
 
That's a very well written article. That last paragraph nails it.

I truly believe Bush to be somewhat psychotic. He has a detachment from reality which is something that isn't a problem with, say, Britney Spears, but which is truly alarming in a President.

He also has a very casual disregard for life, and a weird view on war. He did tell a ghostwriter in the '90's that he didn't think a President could achieve "greatness" without a war.

What a twisted mind...

I know…and especially the last paragraph, he really lays it out. It’s all true, even though there are still some bush acolytes around who will deny it to their last breath. I don’t know if it’s because they can’t stand to be wrong, or if it’s that they would go insane if they ever let themselves fully appreciate the lives lost due to their arrogance and stupidity. I know I would. But there’s too many Southern Man types around. Stupid as the day is long, not worth talking to. Possessing worthless little lives, they are worthless little men and women, and they play out their pretend greatness through the might of the US Military.

It’s just so tragic I really can’t stand it anymore.
 
Now that Bush has lost his causus belli to wage war on iran (a nuclear weapons program), he's going to try to manufacture any reason he can to strike them.

But, in a functioning democracy, the fourth estate - our mainstream media - would sniff out and debunk every bullsh*t reason he tried to throw against the wall. And loudly inform the american people of the bullsh*t.

And yet we see again, the american MSM falling down on the job. Who was it that first wrote that the Navy had edited and stitched together separate audio and video footage for the Iranian "speed boat" incident? The british press. Who sniffed out and revealed that the "threatening voice" on the audio may well have been a well know persian gulf prankster called "the filipino monkey"? The freakin' "Navy Times". The NAVY TIMES...not the NY Times, Wash Post, or CNN.
 
Now that Bush has lost his causus belli to wage war on iran (a nuclear weapons program), he's going to try to manufacture any reason he can to strike them.

But, in a functioning democracy, the fourth estate - our mainstream media - would sniff out and debunk every bullsh*t reason he tried to throw against the wall. And loudly inform the american people of the bullsh*t.

And yet we see again, the american MSM falling down on the job. Who was it that first wrote that the Navy had edited and stitched together separate audio and video footage for the Iranian "speed boat" incident? The british press. Who sniffed out and revealed that the "threatening voice" on the audio may well have been a well know persian gulf prankster called "the filipino monkey"? The freakin' "Navy Times". The NAVY TIMES...not the NY Times, Wash Post, or CNN.

In order for your conspiracy to be viable shouldn't the Navy blown the boats out of the water? Or where the boats piloted by conspirators as well?
:idea:
 
One thing that I think is clear over the past few weeks. Had it not been for that NIE, which it looks like Bush is ignoring anyway, I don't think there is any question at all that we would have been at war with Iran by year's end.

Now, at least there is a chance, even though Bush still seems determined.
 
Let's hope the Iranians are as folled by Bush's stance as you are.

Sans an attack on our troops or Israel, the US is not going to war with Iran under Bush's term. Above all else he's a practical stratergist, and there is simply not enough time between now and January '09 to build up troops, give lip service to the UN, roll into Tehran, grab Mujeenadad and a few Mullahs, fix the stuff that we break and fill up some blue ink pots.
 
Let's hope the Iranians are as folled by Bush's stance as you are.

Sans an attack on our troops or Israel, the US is not going to war with Iran under Bush's term. Above all else he's a practical stratergist, and there is simply not enough time between now and January '09 to build up troops, give lip service to the UN, roll into Tehran, grab Mujeenadad and a few Mullahs, fix the stuff that we break and fill up some blue ink pots.

He can just do the fun part and leave the cleanup to someone else. I don't believe he's above that.
 
When A declares was on B then loses, A gets to keep B's land. It's always been that way. In fact the US may be the only nation that has not done so.

Methinks you're trying to apply western values to this conflict. :pke:

It's still not exactly an amicable transition of ownership. The war is still on. You're applying western values, you're blind to the colonialism of europeans back into an area they believe is theirs based on mythology, and some kind of Pax Judaica or some bullshit.
 
Um...guys? It's clearly an opinion piece....it's not a news article....

Um... no... really??? I never would have guessed. :rolleyes:

No one questioned whether it was a news piece or op ed. He simply commented on the fact that it was a heavily biased piece of crap and I agreed.
 
Um... no... really??? I never would have guessed. :rolleyes:

No one questioned whether it was a news piece or op ed. He simply commented on the fact that it was a heavily biased piece of crap and I agreed.

No - he implied sarcastically that it wasn't objective & unbiased. By their very nature, opinion pieces are NOT objective & unbiased.

I, for one, am glad for that. I like opinion pieces.
 
Back
Top