Canceled.LTroll.29
Banned
According to Democrats, America's "image" in the world has never been worse.
It's going to get a lot worse, if Barack can't win in November.
You see, right now, they're anticipating (and perhaps funding) a 'Crat landslide in our upcoming election. They think a dominant Jackass Party would be good for them, and they're right.
Nuclear Iran and nuclear North Korea are going to be very disappointed if Obama loses.
Abu Ayman, who belongs to the Islamic Jihad terror group (Michael Moore calls 'em "Freedom Fighters") has stated "We saw in Iraq this month how Allah helped the mujahedeen fighters to mark a great victory, a victory that brought the Americans to speak for the first time seriously and sincerely that Iraq is becoming a new Vietnam and that they should fix a schedule for their withdrawal from Iraq."
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said "Many who are dissapointed in the struggle between the Islamic world and the infidels say it is not possible to have a world without the United States and Zionism. But you know that this is a possible goal and slogan."
What would Obama say to mitigate the hatred evident in such men's positions?
We need statesmen, not appeasers.
Can't tell the difference? Winston Churchill (statesman) is supposed to have defined an appeaser as "one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last."
Appeasers (Neville Chamberlain) want to engage in endless "talks" (Munich) for the sake of maintaining an illusion of "peace".
Diplomacy preserves our nation's security. A statesman (Ronald Reagan) leaves the table (Reykjavik) when viable compromises are not forthcoming.
It's going to get a lot worse, if Barack can't win in November.
You see, right now, they're anticipating (and perhaps funding) a 'Crat landslide in our upcoming election. They think a dominant Jackass Party would be good for them, and they're right.
Nuclear Iran and nuclear North Korea are going to be very disappointed if Obama loses.
Abu Ayman, who belongs to the Islamic Jihad terror group (Michael Moore calls 'em "Freedom Fighters") has stated "We saw in Iraq this month how Allah helped the mujahedeen fighters to mark a great victory, a victory that brought the Americans to speak for the first time seriously and sincerely that Iraq is becoming a new Vietnam and that they should fix a schedule for their withdrawal from Iraq."
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said "Many who are dissapointed in the struggle between the Islamic world and the infidels say it is not possible to have a world without the United States and Zionism. But you know that this is a possible goal and slogan."
What would Obama say to mitigate the hatred evident in such men's positions?
We need statesmen, not appeasers.
Can't tell the difference? Winston Churchill (statesman) is supposed to have defined an appeaser as "one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last."
Appeasers (Neville Chamberlain) want to engage in endless "talks" (Munich) for the sake of maintaining an illusion of "peace".
Diplomacy preserves our nation's security. A statesman (Ronald Reagan) leaves the table (Reykjavik) when viable compromises are not forthcoming.
