Are numbers created or discovered?

Cypress

Well-known member
My sense is that the existence of Pi, e, Feigenbaum constant, golden ratio, et. al suggest that numbers are an abstract Platonic reality which exist independently of human consciousness.


 
Didn't watch the video, so I might be missing something, but I always thought they were a human creation outside of reality to explain the world around them, once they found a consensus on zero they could offer an explanation of anything quantitatively
 
Didn't watch the video, so I might be missing something, but I always thought they were a human creation outside of reality to explain the world around them, once they found a consensus on zero they could offer an explanation of anything quantitatively

I do not think there is any right answer. It is an open question, and your opinion is as good as mine.
 
It’s a found way to measure reality ina way the human brain can understand reality

I think fractals in nature are possibly an expression of an underlying mathematical reality which exists independently of human consciousness. I also think you are right that there is that element of human invention to mathematics to create a language we can use to describe observable reality.
 
I do not think there is any right answer. It is an open question, and your opinion is as good as mine.

But even if they were a human creation could they not still fill the understanding of an abstract Platonic reality regardless of if they exist somewhere out there?
 
I think fractals in nature are possibly an expression of an underlying mathematical reality which exists independently of human consciousness. I also think you are right that there is that element of human invention to mathematics to create a language we can use to describe observable reality.

The structure exists without humans


It’s a language we use to understand that structure
 
I don't know what constructivist means.

I just used Platonic lexicon in the context of an abstract reality we can only sense with our mind's eye.

Platonism and constructivism are two ideas about the reality and numbers. Constructivism says math is real only such that it can be constructed and used.
 
The structure exists without humans


It’s a language we use to understand that structure
Your right in that sense. Pi does not have to be represented as 3.141, that is just our convention for talking about it using Hindu-Arabic numerals. But the underlying reality of it exists regardless of human convention.
 
You may be overthinking this.
If I have 3 goats, and want to sell you 2, how is that 'discovered'?

Does everybody here start smoking weed early on Fridays?
 
You may be overthinking this.
If I have 3 goats, and want to sell you 2, how is that 'discovered'?

Does everybody here start smoking weed early on Fridays?

In the video, Roger Penrose, one of the greatest mathematicians of the last 100 years, considers this an interesting question warranting reflection.

I figured that makes the question good enough for me.
 
My sense is that the existence of Pi, e, Feigenbaum constant, golden ratio, et. al suggest that numbers are an abstract Platonic reality which exist independently of human consciousness.



It is both.

Numbers are invented to describe the reality. How did the geniuses predict something that happened?
 
It is both.

Numbers are invented to describe the reality. How did the geniuses predict something that happened?

That is well said, and there is a lot of truth to your assertion.

But nobody invented the square root of two. The Pythagoreans stumbled across it and were disturbed and shocked by it's mathematical implications.
 
You may be overthinking this.
If I have 3 goats, and want to sell you 2, how is that 'discovered'?

Does everybody here start smoking weed early on Fridays?

But how did you know you had three goats? Without numbers, you wouldn't know what you had, numbers allowed you to come up with the arbitrary understand of what three means and allows you to know. Question becomes were numbers invented by humans or do they exist outside of human comprehension

Granted a little off what is normally seen on this forum, but interesting, "cypress" gets kudos for getting it beyond three posts without the evolving into the uusal personal insults
 
Back
Top