British Journalist/Former Leftist Dismantles Progressivism

Pointgold

Keeps It Simple
Ten outstanding quotes/excerpts in a critique of the former fascist left by one of their own. Interesting how the most damning tales of Totalitarianism, Communism, Nazism, etc. are from those who survived it.

Award winning British journalist and best-selling author Melanie Phillips’Guardian Angel.” “Guardian Angel” tells the story of how Phillips started her career in British journalism on the Left in the late 1970s, only to become a stalwart Liberal culture warrior, as reflected in her positions on Islam, Israel, feminism, education, economics, environmentalism and a whole host of other issues that have earned her the wrath and contempt of European Leftists, particularly among media peers.

Guardian-Angel-e1392852883368.jpg


1.The “Chicago Way” (in London) ”I always believed in the duty of a journalist to uphold truth over lies, follow the evidence where it led and fight abuses of power wherever they were to be found. I gradually realised, however, that the left was not on the side of truth, reason, and justice, but instead promoted ideology, malice, and oppression. Rather than fighting the abuse of power, it embodied it.

Through demonising its enemies in this way, the left has undermined the possibility of finding common ground and all but destroyed rational discourse. This is because, as shown by its reaction to Lady Thatcher’s death, it substitutes insult and abuse for argument and reasoned disagreement.”

Through demonising its enemies…the left has…all but destroyed rational discourse


2.Leftist totalitarianism ”Moreover, while there were undoubtedly serious differences, the distinction between tankie totalitarians and the soft left served to mask the fact that the soft left was also totalitarian in its instincts. It may have recoiled from the tanks rolling into Hungary or Czechoslovakia, but it most certainly parked its own tanks on the lawns of British society. From there it proceeded to lay siege to the fortresses of Western culture, crushing all dissent beneath its tracks.”

3.The Overton Window ”More devastatingly still, by twisting the meaning of words such as liberal, compassion, justice and many others into their opposites, it has hijacked the centre-ground of politics. Left-wing ideology is now falsely said to constitute the moderate centre-ground, while the true centre-ground is now vilified as ‘the right’. This is as mind-bending as it is destructive, for it has introduced a fatal confusion into political debate on both sides of the Atlantic. Redefining the true middle ground of politics as ‘right-wing’ has served to besmirch and toxify the commitment to truth, reason, decency, and reality which characterises where most people happen to situate their thinking. At the same time, by loudly asserting that left-wing ideology is really ‘centrist’, the left has succeeded in presenting extremist, antisocial, or even nihilistic ideas as unarguably good, and all dissent is promptly vilified as ‘extreme’…For by asserting that it embodied the centre ground, what the left actually did was to hijack the centre ground and substitute its own extreme values — thus shifting Britain’s centre of political and moral gravity to the left, and besmirching as extremists those on the true centre ground. And something very similar has happened in the US, where language has been appropriated in order to engineer a seismic shift in attitudes, concealed by a mind-bending reversal of the meaning of words.”

4. The Middle Eastern double standard and Leftist racism ”In a leader conference one day, I asked why the Guardian appeared to be pursuing a double standard in its coverage of the Middle East. Why did it afford next-to-no coverage of Arab atrocities against other Arabs while devoting acres of space to attacking Israel for defending itself against terrorism? The answer I received from my colleagues that day stunned me. Of course there was a double standard, they said. How could there not be? The Third World did not subscribe to the same ethical beliefs as the West about the value of human life. The West therefore was not entitled to judge any mass killings in the Third World by its own standards. That would be racist.
The left actually abandons the oppressed of the world..all the time weeping crocodile tears for them


<snip>

6. The negligent welfare state ”The experience of those years also told me that something was going very wrong with the welfare state. It wasn’t just the lack of provision, which meant that the only care available for my mother from the local authority was a few hours a week with untrained carers who had been recruited off the street. It was also a callousness and indifference amongst the supposedly caring services. It was the hospital nurses who, when my mother broke her hip and through her feebleness was unable to move at all in her hospital bed, left her food and water unwrapped or out of reach and refused to make her comfortable; and the ward sister who, when I complained, told me with a straight face that my mother, who could barely put one foot in front of the other, had a short time before been ‘skipping round the ward’. I realised then that in the National Health Service, Britain’s sanctified temple of altruism, compassion, and decency, if you were old, feeble, and poor you just didn’t stand a chance.”

In the National Health Service…if you were old, feeble, and poor you just didn’t stand a chance.



The rest:

http://www.theblaze.com/blog/2014/0...est-selling-british-author-who-left-the-left/
 
I have a lot of time for Melanie Philips, she was on the TV recently talking about her days at the Gaurdian and how disillusioned she became with all the posturing and logical disconnection that abounded there.
 
and Hilary used to be a goldwater girl.


this person you highlight cant determine what a true fact is.

Of course shes a right leaning clown
 
and Hilary used to be a goldwater girl.


this person you highlight cant determine what a true fact is.

Of course shes a right leaning clown

Do you ever attach any rational arguments of opposition to your post, or is name calling and empty accusations your only talent? What exactly has the woman said that you disagree with and can expose as fallacy? I'll wait.
 
Apparently you're too fucking stupid to realize that the woman had a political conversion, huh commie?

She had a conversion from opportunist scum to opportunist scum, like so many phoney twicers since capitalism began. Are you really that thick, or are you merely pretending? Find me anything she ever wrote that shows personal conviction, left or right. Like the rest of you, she cares only for money.
 
Do you ever attach any rational arguments of opposition to your post, or is name calling and empty accusations your only talent? What exactly has the woman said that you disagree with and can expose as fallacy? I'll wait.

that she was interested in the solutions the right offers mankind.

You see Ive seen those ideas and they are idiot cover stories for the wealthys greed
 
that she was interested in the solutions the right offers mankind.

You see Ive seen those ideas and they are idiot cover stories for the wealthys greed

Well then post something of her's along with your rebuttal of it, I''ll wait.
 
She had a conversion from opportunist scum to opportunist scum, like so many phoney twicers since capitalism began. Are you really that thick, or are you merely pretending? Find me anything she ever wrote that shows personal conviction, left or right. Like the rest of you, she cares only for money.

Oh! So that's how she became an "AWARD WINNING" journalist, right commie?
 
Melanie Phillips is about as 'left' as Mrs Palin's arse. Stop talking propagandist drivel!

Well everybody is right when compared to a Marxist dinosaur like you. Why don't you go to Kiev and tell the people that they are making a big mistake?
 
Last edited:
the current right in this country seeks to make kings out of the uber wealthy.


that is a really stupid philosophy in a democracy
 
Yes - she licked Murdoch's arse. You too can win that award, donkey-fancier.

So say's ye, the commie moron. As usual, no facts, no rational rebuttal to anything posted in opposition to leftist propaganda, just insults and illiterate accusations.
 
The court’s action is a victory for the DNC, and it comes after an election year in which the two parties regularly exchanged charges over “voter fraud” and “voter intimidation.” But most of the recent battles have been fought on the state level, and it is not clear whether the long-standing consent decree has had much impact.

The case began in 1981 when the RNC created a “national ballot security task force” that, among other things, undertook mailing campaigns targeted at black and Latino neighborhoods in New Jersey. If mailers were returned undelivered, party activists put those voters on a list to be challenged if they showed up to cast a ballot. In addition, the party was alleged to have hired off-duty law enforcement officers to “patrol” minority neighborhoods on election day.

The DNC sued the RNC in federal court, alleging its activities violated the Voting Rights Act and were intended to suppress voting among minorities. Rather than fight the charges in a trial, the RNC agreed to a consent decree promising to “refrain from undertaking any ballot security activities … directed toward [election] districts that have a substantial proportion of racial or ethnic minority populations.”

The consent decree has remained in effect, and DNC lawyers say they have gone to court in states such as Arkansas, Kentucky, Louisiana and Pennsylvania to challenge Republican activities that appear to target mostly black precincts. Both sides agree, however, that the consent decree does not forbid “normal poll watching” by Republican officials.

The RNC has tried repeatedly to have the consent decree lifted, contending it interferes with its efforts to combat voter fraud. But a federal judge in New Jersey in 2009 ruled that it should remain in effect, and the U.S. Court of Appeals agreed last year.

In appealing to the Supreme Court, the RNC’s lawyers cited past decisions by the justices that ended long-standing court orders involving school desegregation and prison overcrowding. But the justices with no dissent dismissed the appeal in the case of RNC vs. DNC


http://articles.latimes.com/2013/jan/14/news/la-pn-supreme-court-rnc-voter-fraud-20130114



why do you refuse these facts ?
 
You see you lying and or stupid cons are the ones who deny FACTS


how fucking dishonest can you be if you refuse our entire court system right up to the SCOTUS????
 
What lies does this dumb con chick use to deny the republican party cheats its fucking ass off in elections?
 
Back
Top