Bye Bye Phil, you fraudster!

tinfoil

Banned
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CAM0VG0&show_article=1

LOL yep, he did nothing wrong. That's why he's stepping down. Bwahahahah global warmers just lost a huge battle-- the battle for their credibility.

What a sweet day. Thank god some whistleblower had the balls to out these fraudsters.

People, if you still believe CO2 drives climate, you're an idiot.

The whole case of unprecedented rates of temp? LOL fraudulent adjusted with a crude function.

;
; Apply a VERY ARTIFICAL correction for decline!!
;
yrloc=[1400,findgen(19)*5.+1904]
valadj=[0.,0.,0.,0.,0.,-0.1,-0.25,-0.3,0.,- 0.1,0.3,0.8,1.2,1.7,2.5,2.6,2.6,$
2.6,2.6,2.6]*0.75 ; fudge factor
if n_elements(yrloc) ne n_elements(valadj) then message,’Oooops!’
;
yearlyadj=interpol(valadj,yrloc,timey)

starting in 1940, a function adds negative values to temps in the 40s and 50s and then adds double in a positive value.

The contents are then multiplied by .75 suggesting a little fine tuning to make it look realistic and have the final years temps mate up with real observed temps--the ones you can't fake so easily.




look it up warmers. LOL I'm dreaming. You guys are hiding away praying to CO2 to warm the planet. LOL

The hockey stick is now a fudgesicle
 
They won't respond to this. They haven't been given their talking points yet! What will probably happen is, a bunch of these pinheads will have a 'summit' and discuss where to go from here. Naturally, since there is massive amounts of taxpayer dollars at stake, not to mention book deals, movie deals, political action committees, etc... they will formulate some pruned down version of the same garbage, and claim they have it right this time. Oh, they will bombard us with "peer reviewed" studies, and data compiled by "independent sources", and anyone who is skeptical will be portrayed as cretinous knuckledraggers who don't believe in science. 20 years from now, we will see yet another generation of public-school-(de)educated youth, clinging to this silly bullshit all over again.


But for now.... nahh... they ain't gonna say a word!!
 
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CAM0VG0&show_article=1

LOL yep, he did nothing wrong. That's why he's stepping down. Bwahahahah global warmers just lost a huge battle-- the battle for their credibility.

What a sweet day. Thank god some whistleblower had the balls to out these fraudsters.

People, if you still believe CO2 drives climate, you're an idiot.

The whole case of unprecedented rates of temp? LOL fraudulent adjusted with a crude function.

;
; Apply a VERY ARTIFICAL correction for decline!!
;
yrloc=[1400,findgen(19)*5.+1904]
valadj=[0.,0.,0.,0.,0.,-0.1,-0.25,-0.3,0.,- 0.1,0.3,0.8,1.2,1.7,2.5,2.6,2.6,$
2.6,2.6,2.6]*0.75 ; fudge factor
if n_elements(yrloc) ne n_elements(valadj) then message,’Oooops!’
;
yearlyadj=interpol(valadj,yrloc,timey)

starting in 1940, a function adds negative values to temps in the 40s and 50s and then adds double in a positive value.

The contents are then multiplied by .75 suggesting a little fine tuning to make it look realistic and have the final years temps mate up with real observed temps--the ones you can't fake so easily.




look it up warmers. LOL I'm dreaming. You guys are hiding away praying to CO2 to warm the planet. LOL

The hockey stick is now a fudgesicle

Hopefully there is a place in hell reserved for people like you. The death penalty should only be applied in one case - to global warming hoax believers.
 
Hopefully there is a place in hell reserved for people like you. The death penalty should only be applied in one case - to global warming hoax believers.

Dude, we're deniers, not believers.

See, everyone, the kid can't even keep track of the simplistic concepts.
 
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/wor...down_over_hacked_global_warming_email_fl.html



"This private communication in no way damages the credibility of the ... findings," he said, saying that all conclusions were subjected to rigorous review.

Some CRU researchers contribute to the IPCC's reports which pull together data from scientists around the world in an attempt to give a consensus view on climate change. "Opposition groups are taking passages out of context to try to undermine public confidence in climate science," the Union of Concerned Scientists said in a statement on Wednesday.

"Even without data from CRU, there is still an overwhelming body of evidence that human activity (is) triggering dangerous levels of global warming," it said.




Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/wor...ed_global_warming_email_fl.html#ixzz0YXoaTVNU
 
Yea one dude freaking lied about the data.
the libtards will say he was the only one
he was the only one caught, gov catches 2% of drug dealers and they are looking hard.
They are not even looking for the climate alarmist cheaters. LOFL
 
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CAM0VG0&show_article=1

LOL yep, he did nothing wrong. That's why he's stepping down. Bwahahahah global warmers just lost a huge battle-- the battle for their credibility.

What a sweet day. Thank god some whistleblower had the balls to out these fraudsters.

People, if you still believe CO2 drives climate, you're an idiot.

The whole case of unprecedented rates of temp? LOL fraudulent adjusted with a crude function.

;
; Apply a VERY ARTIFICAL correction for decline!!
;
yrloc=[1400,findgen(19)*5.+1904]
valadj=[0.,0.,0.,0.,0.,-0.1,-0.25,-0.3,0.,- 0.1,0.3,0.8,1.2,1.7,2.5,2.6,2.6,$
2.6,2.6,2.6]*0.75 ; fudge factor
if n_elements(yrloc) ne n_elements(valadj) then message,’Oooops!’
;
yearlyadj=interpol(valadj,yrloc,timey)

starting in 1940, a function adds negative values to temps in the 40s and 50s and then adds double in a positive value.

The contents are then multiplied by .75 suggesting a little fine tuning to make it look realistic and have the final years temps mate up with real observed temps--the ones you can't fake so easily.




look it up warmers. LOL I'm dreaming. You guys are hiding away praying to CO2 to warm the planet. LOL

The hockey stick is now a fudgesicle
I think we need to start a new poll. Who is more ignorant in science Dixie or Tinfoil? That one would run neck and neck.
 
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/wor...down_over_hacked_global_warming_email_fl.html



"This private communication in no way damages the credibility of the ... findings," he said, saying that all conclusions were subjected to rigorous review.

Some CRU researchers contribute to the IPCC's reports which pull together data from scientists around the world in an attempt to give a consensus view on climate change. "Opposition groups are taking passages out of context to try to undermine public confidence in climate science," the Union of Concerned Scientists said in a statement on Wednesday.

"Even without data from CRU, there is still an overwhelming body of evidence that human activity (is) triggering dangerous levels of global warming," it said.




Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/wor...ed_global_warming_email_fl.html#ixzz0YXoaTVNU
Don'tt waste your time Desh. What Tin knows about science wouldn't cover a postage stamp.
 
Is this the dude who destoyed the original data???
There were others that destroyed their data to keep it from the prying eyes of the knowledgeable. This clearly wasn't the only person who "massaged" their data a bit.
 
Is this the dude who destoyed the original data???
Who knows. It's a stupid argument on Tin's part. He believes what he wants to believe and he's only going to accept that which agrees with that. If you go out and look at the vast quantity of peer reviewed literature on climactic change, then it becomes pretty obvious that you can discount pretty much most of what he has to say, out of hand, as the prattlings of an uninformed fool.
 
"This private communication in no way damages the credibility of the ... findings," he said, saying that all conclusions were subjected to rigorous review.


"Even without data from CRU, there is still an overwhelming body of evidence that human activity (is) triggering dangerous levels of global warming," it said.

why didn't he just say 'these aren't the droids you're looking for'?
 
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/wor...down_over_hacked_global_warming_email_fl.html



"This private communication in no way damages the credibility of the ... findings," he said, saying that all conclusions were subjected to rigorous review.

Some CRU researchers contribute to the IPCC's reports which pull together data from scientists around the world in an attempt to give a consensus view on climate change. "Opposition groups are taking passages out of context to try to undermine public confidence in climate science," the Union of Concerned Scientists said in a statement on Wednesday.

"Even without data from CRU, there is still an overwhelming body of evidence that human activity (is) triggering dangerous levels of global warming," it said.

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/wor...ed_global_warming_email_fl.html#ixzz0YXoaTVNU

No one has proven he lied about ANYTHING

Folks, I predicted it in Post #3, but I had no idea it would be this quick!

Now we will start to hear the lefties retort... no one can prove he lied! He hasn't been convicted of lying! Pinheads like evince will follow this bunch off a cliff, because it means they get to hold the political banner of "Saving The Planet!" It doesn't matter if they destroy jobs or our ability to create new jobs! It doesn't matter that we have been completely misled on all of this! Let's sock it to Big Corporations, and make this a Left/Right issue, because there is too much political traction to be gained by promoting the left as planet savers and bashing the right as people who want to destroy the environment for profit.

Take your head out of your ass and understand, there is nothing man is doing to change the climate! The Earth gets warmer and cooler, it happens in long cycles, over hundreds of thousands of years, and there is nothing we can do about it now, any more than the dinosaurs could have done when it happened to them! This is merely a case of liberals screaming, "the sky is falling!" Well, the sky ain't falling! Wake the fuck up!
 
not going to wait for the evidence to be presented huh?

Why am I not surprized you swore on your life that iraq has WMDs too
 
Back
Top