California Court Censors Website

Timshel

New member
http://www.zcommunications.org/znet/viewArticle/16554

California Court Wipes Wikileaks.org Out of Existence
February 19, 2008 By Stephen Soldz


Stephen Soldz's ZSpace Page

Join ZSpace


One of the most important web sites in recent months has been Wikileaks.org. Created by several brave journalists committed to transparency, Wikieaks has published important leaked documents, such as the Rules of Engagement for Iraq [see my The Secret Rules of Engagement in Iraq], the 2003 and 2004 Guantanamo Camp Delta Standard Operating Procedures, and evidence of major bank fraud in Kenya [see also here] that apparently affected the Kenyan elections. Wikileaks has upset the Chinese government enough that they are attempting to censor it, as is the Thai military junta.

Now censorship has extended to the United States of America, land of the First Amendment. As of Friday, February 15, those going to Wikileaks.org have gotten Server not found messages. Today I received a message explaining that a California court has granted an injunction written and requested by lawyers for the Cayman Island's Bank Julius Baer. It seems that the bank is trying to keep the public from accessing documents that may reveal shady dealings. Wikileaks was only given a couple of hours notice "by email" and was not even represented at the hearing where a U.S. judge took such a drastic step attempting to totally shut down an important information outlet. The result was this totally unprecedented attempt to totally wipe out the existence of Wikileaks:

"Dynadot shall immediately clear and remove all DNS hosting records for the wikileaks.org domain name and prevent the domain name from resolving to the wikileaks.org website or any other website or server other than a blank park page, until further order of this Court."
 
I think it is because they use .org insteand of .be where it actually resides that they can't gain access...
 
Meanwhile, Wikileaks still exists. Its founders, knowing that governments and institutions will go to extreme lengths to censor the truth, have created an extensive network of cover names from which one can access their materials or continue leaking the secrets of governments and the corrupt rich and powerful. Thus, everything is available at Wikileaks.be, among other names. Let the leaks continue!
 
Temporary injunctions are not uncommon. They've tried it with newspapers in the past, but the Dallas Morning News has gotten around it because of the specifics of the law that make the plaintiff prove that it would be effective. So when they had a story they heard was on its way to being seen by a court, they went ahead and just posted it online so it was in the permanent record and hundreds of thousands of people may have already read it - gag order ineffective after that point of course.
 
Back
Top