Should this be untrue ^ it appears that you are a know-nothing dick-head.
Sue away feckless bitches. But be very careful since you are always, without fail, 100% of the time, doing exactly what you accuse other of. Ask the NY negro criminal how it's going with her lawfare.
The chickens are coming home to roost now that daddy's home.
Ain't it grand?
babies crying
we expected the shit stains to use lawfareYour boy is being sued- that's the point.
I listened to the attorney outlining the case for the first state to sue- and it seems to me that Trump is going to lose.
So- could this lead to an impeachment ? I'm keen to see the back of Trump, you see, as I view him as a deranged narcissus.
Explain your perception of the difference between ' law' and ' lawfare 'we expected the shit stains to use lawfare
I repeat ~ babies crying
using the judicial branch to stop the executive branch from execution is textrbook lawfareExplain your perception of the difference between ' law' and ' lawfare '
So you maintain that government is above the law.using the judicial branch to stop the executive branch from execution is textrbook lawfare
I maintain suing a president for implementing the very tariffs he campaigned on is lawfareSo you maintain that government is above the law.
Are you happy to confirm your own serfdom when you vote ?
Were you aware that Trump's campaign boasts might be illegal when you voted for him ?I maintain suing a president for implementing the very tariffs he campaigned on is lawfare
What exactly does that say about your offering? The nickel a ride mattress backI'm keen to see the back of Trump, you see, as I view him as a deranged narcissus.
Frivolous lawsuits are harassment. They are designed to annoy and take up time and nothing more.Explain your perception of the difference between ' law' and ' lawfare '
Who would want to retain a judge who is contemptuous of the law?He's also accused of being contemptuous of US law;
Trump live: Judge finds ‘probable cause’ to hold White House in contempt
United States Judge James Boasberg has found “probable cause” to hold the White House in contempt of court, for showing “willful disregard” for his order to cease deportations under the Alien Enemies Act of 1798.
![]()
US judge finds ‘probable cause’ to hold Trump White House in contempt
Judge James Boasberg issued an order saying the Trump administration showed ‘willful disregard’ for court orders.www.aljazeera.com
Who would want to retain a felon president who is contemptuous of the law ?
are you aware you are a retard making assumptions?Were you aware that Trump's campaign boasts might be illegal when you voted for him ?
What exactly does that say about your offering? The nickel a ride mattress back
Frivolous lawsuits are harassment. They are designed to annoy and take up time and nothing more.
This time Trump has an army of lawyers you are paying for to defend what's right and put these cockroaches back in their place.