uscitizen
Villified User
A confusing thing for many lately I think.
The 2 used to be pretty much the same 30 years ago.
But now we have spendthrift Republicans.
conservative Demoncrats.
Corportate socialist Dems and Repubs.
Social conservatives...
I keep hearing Bush is no conservative from those who voted for him twice.
But I am not convinced that they would not have voted for Bush again if they could.
Ideals or Party first? Which is it with Republicans?
Dems seem to be more diverse. Ie several of us hacking on Reid on here. Not many republicans would have hacked on one of theirs in a leadership position.
Of course politically speaking that diversity is a weakness to be exploited by the other party. However I think it is individial gains that add up to strength.
The 2 used to be pretty much the same 30 years ago.
But now we have spendthrift Republicans.
conservative Demoncrats.
Corportate socialist Dems and Repubs.
Social conservatives...
I keep hearing Bush is no conservative from those who voted for him twice.
But I am not convinced that they would not have voted for Bush again if they could.
Ideals or Party first? Which is it with Republicans?
Dems seem to be more diverse. Ie several of us hacking on Reid on here. Not many republicans would have hacked on one of theirs in a leadership position.
Of course politically speaking that diversity is a weakness to be exploited by the other party. However I think it is individial gains that add up to strength.