Critics say CNN's Bash used 'kid gloves' with Harris and Walz, while Vance 'grilled'

ExpressLane

Verified User

Critics say CNN's Bash used 'kid gloves' with Harris and Walz, while Vance 'grilled'


Vice President Kamala Harris sat down for her first media interview Thursday since ascending the Democratic presidential ticket, with some critics arguing the CNN interviewer should have taken a tougher approach similar to an interview just weeks before with former President Trump's running mate.


CNN’s Dana Bash interviewed Harris and her running mate, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, for a total of roughly 26 pretaped minutes, which aired Thursday night. Harris was asked about inconsistencies in her political record, Trump’s personal attacks and what she would accomplish on day one in the Oval Office.

Walz was asked about comments he made on the campaign trail related to his military service — that he once carried weapons in war, though he was never deployed to a war zone.

Some critics say they wish Bash had pressed the pair in the way she grilled GOP vice presidential candidate JD Vance in a one-on-one interview just weeks before.

Vice President Kamala Harris raised eyebrows when telling CNN's Dana Bash that her "values haven't changed" after making complete reversals on far-left positions she held in 2019. (Screenshot/CNN)
placeholder

"Mixed marks for Bash, who pushed on some necessary subjects, but missed glaring follow-ups," Fox News contributor Guy Benson posted on X.

More specifically, Vanessa Santos, president of Renegade PR, told Fox News Digital on Friday, "Dana was fired up when she grilled JD about his 'cat lady' comments. If she would've brought even half of that energy to the Harris-Walz interview, voters might have learned something last night."

"Instead, she let their nonsensical answers go unchecked and unchallenged," she said.

Bash asked Walz during the interview, "You said that you carried weapons in war, but you have never actually deployed in a war zone. A campaign official said that you misspoke. Did you?"

placeholder

Walz replied, "I'm incredibly proud. I've done 24 years of wearing the uniform of this country, equally proud of my service in a public-school classroom, whether it's Congress or the governor. My record speaks for itself, but I think people are coming to get to know me. I speak like they do. I speak candidly. I wear my emotions on my sleeves. And I speak especially passionately about our children being shot in schools and around guns. So, I think people know me. They know who I am. They know where my heart is. And again, my record has been out there for over 40 years to speak for itself."

"And the idea that you said that you were in war, did you misspeak as the campaign has said?" Bash pressed.

"Yeah. I said we were talking about, in this case, this was after a school shooting, the idea of carrying these weapons of war. And, my wife, the English teacher, she told me my grammar is not always correct," he said.

In contrast, during her interview earlier this month with Vance, Bash pressed the Ohio senator for roughly six minutes about his leading the charge on criticizing Walz’s characterization of his military record, challenging his criticisms three separate times during the segment.


She also pressed him multiple times on his "childless cat ladies" comments from an interview a few years ago.




Sen. JD Vance, R-Ohio, speaks during a campaign event in Henderson, Nevada, on July 30. (AP Photo/Ellen Schmidt)
But critics argued that Bash didn't ask the hard-hitting questions Americans wanted to hear during her interview of Harris and Walz on Thursday.

In one light exchange, Bash questioned Harris about a viral photo of Harris' young niece watching her speech at the Democratic National Convention.


"You didn’t explicitly talk about gender or race in your speech. But it obviously means a lot to a lot of people. And that viral picture really says it. What does it mean to you?" Bash asked.

Harris replied, "I am running because I believe that I am the best person to do this job at this moment for all Americans, regardless of race and gender. But I did see that photograph, and I was deeply touched by it."....
===================================
Bash threw fast balls at Vance but threw softballs at Harris. Vance hit them out of the park and Harris struck out.
 

Critics say CNN's Bash used 'kid gloves' with Harris and Walz, while Vance 'grilled'


Vice President Kamala Harris sat down for her first media interview Thursday since ascending the Democratic presidential ticket, with some critics arguing the CNN interviewer should have taken a tougher approach similar to an interview just weeks before with former President Trump's running mate.


CNN’s Dana Bash interviewed Harris and her running mate, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, for a total of roughly 26 pretaped minutes, which aired Thursday night. Harris was asked about inconsistencies in her political record, Trump’s personal attacks and what she would accomplish on day one in the Oval Office.

Walz was asked about comments he made on the campaign trail related to his military service — that he once carried weapons in war, though he was never deployed to a war zone.

Some critics say they wish Bash had pressed the pair in the way she grilled GOP vice presidential candidate JD Vance in a one-on-one interview just weeks before.

Vice President Kamala Harris raised eyebrows when telling CNN's Dana Bash that her "values haven't changed" after making complete reversals on far-left positions she held in 2019. (Screenshot/CNN)
placeholder

"Mixed marks for Bash, who pushed on some necessary subjects, but missed glaring follow-ups," Fox News contributor Guy Benson posted on X.

More specifically, Vanessa Santos, president of Renegade PR, told Fox News Digital on Friday, "Dana was fired up when she grilled JD about his 'cat lady' comments. If she would've brought even half of that energy to the Harris-Walz interview, voters might have learned something last night."

"Instead, she let their nonsensical answers go unchecked and unchallenged," she said.

Bash asked Walz during the interview, "You said that you carried weapons in war, but you have never actually deployed in a war zone. A campaign official said that you misspoke. Did you?"

placeholder

Walz replied, "I'm incredibly proud. I've done 24 years of wearing the uniform of this country, equally proud of my service in a public-school classroom, whether it's Congress or the governor. My record speaks for itself, but I think people are coming to get to know me. I speak like they do. I speak candidly. I wear my emotions on my sleeves. And I speak especially passionately about our children being shot in schools and around guns. So, I think people know me. They know who I am. They know where my heart is. And again, my record has been out there for over 40 years to speak for itself."

"And the idea that you said that you were in war, did you misspeak as the campaign has said?" Bash pressed.

"Yeah. I said we were talking about, in this case, this was after a school shooting, the idea of carrying these weapons of war. And, my wife, the English teacher, she told me my grammar is not always correct," he said.

In contrast, during her interview earlier this month with Vance, Bash pressed the Ohio senator for roughly six minutes about his leading the charge on criticizing Walz’s characterization of his military record, challenging his criticisms three separate times during the segment.


She also pressed him multiple times on his "childless cat ladies" comments from an interview a few years ago.




Sen. JD Vance, R-Ohio, speaks during a campaign event in Henderson, Nevada, on July 30. (AP Photo/Ellen Schmidt)
But critics argued that Bash didn't ask the hard-hitting questions Americans wanted to hear during her interview of Harris and Walz on Thursday.

In one light exchange, Bash questioned Harris about a viral photo of Harris' young niece watching her speech at the Democratic National Convention.


"You didn’t explicitly talk about gender or race in your speech. But it obviously means a lot to a lot of people. And that viral picture really says it. What does it mean to you?" Bash asked.

Harris replied, "I am running because I believe that I am the best person to do this job at this moment for all Americans, regardless of race and gender. But I did see that photograph, and I was deeply touched by it."....
===================================
Bash threw fast balls at Vance but threw softballs at Harris. Vance hit them out of the park and Harris struck out.
What "critics"? Some RWNJ you know?
 
It doesn't take a critic to analyze what was in that "interview". The woman is a moron and Walz appeared to be an even bigger dunce.
 
It doesn't take a critic to analyze what was in that "interview". The woman is a moron and Walz appeared to be an even bigger dunce.

And yet, they completely befuddled the super-smart Trump campaign every step of the way since Biden dropped out, and lead in the polls.
 

Critics say CNN's Bash used 'kid gloves' with Harris and Walz, while Vance 'grilled'


Vice President Kamala Harris sat down for her first media interview Thursday since ascending the Democratic presidential ticket, with some critics arguing the CNN interviewer should have taken a tougher approach similar to an interview just weeks before with former President Trump's running mate.


CNN’s Dana Bash interviewed Harris and her running mate, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, for a total of roughly 26 pretaped minutes, which aired Thursday night. Harris was asked about inconsistencies in her political record, Trump’s personal attacks and what she would accomplish on day one in the Oval Office.

Walz was asked about comments he made on the campaign trail related to his military service — that he once carried weapons in war, though he was never deployed to a war zone.

Some critics say they wish Bash had pressed the pair in the way she grilled GOP vice presidential candidate JD Vance in a one-on-one interview just weeks before.

Vice President Kamala Harris raised eyebrows when telling CNN's Dana Bash that her "values haven't changed" after making complete reversals on far-left positions she held in 2019. (Screenshot/CNN)
placeholder

"Mixed marks for Bash, who pushed on some necessary subjects, but missed glaring follow-ups," Fox News contributor Guy Benson posted on X.

More specifically, Vanessa Santos, president of Renegade PR, told Fox News Digital on Friday, "Dana was fired up when she grilled JD about his 'cat lady' comments. If she would've brought even half of that energy to the Harris-Walz interview, voters might have learned something last night."

"Instead, she let their nonsensical answers go unchecked and unchallenged," she said.

Bash asked Walz during the interview, "You said that you carried weapons in war, but you have never actually deployed in a war zone. A campaign official said that you misspoke. Did you?"

placeholder

Walz replied, "I'm incredibly proud. I've done 24 years of wearing the uniform of this country, equally proud of my service in a public-school classroom, whether it's Congress or the governor. My record speaks for itself, but I think people are coming to get to know me. I speak like they do. I speak candidly. I wear my emotions on my sleeves. And I speak especially passionately about our children being shot in schools and around guns. So, I think people know me. They know who I am. They know where my heart is. And again, my record has been out there for over 40 years to speak for itself."

"And the idea that you said that you were in war, did you misspeak as the campaign has said?" Bash pressed.

"Yeah. I said we were talking about, in this case, this was after a school shooting, the idea of carrying these weapons of war. And, my wife, the English teacher, she told me my grammar is not always correct," he said.

In contrast, during her interview earlier this month with Vance, Bash pressed the Ohio senator for roughly six minutes about his leading the charge on criticizing Walz’s characterization of his military record, challenging his criticisms three separate times during the segment.


She also pressed him multiple times on his "childless cat ladies" comments from an interview a few years ago.




Sen. JD Vance, R-Ohio, speaks during a campaign event in Henderson, Nevada, on July 30. (AP Photo/Ellen Schmidt)
But critics argued that Bash didn't ask the hard-hitting questions Americans wanted to hear during her interview of Harris and Walz on Thursday.

In one light exchange, Bash questioned Harris about a viral photo of Harris' young niece watching her speech at the Democratic National Convention.


"You didn’t explicitly talk about gender or race in your speech. But it obviously means a lot to a lot of people. And that viral picture really says it. What does it mean to you?" Bash asked.

Harris replied, "I am running because I believe that I am the best person to do this job at this moment for all Americans, regardless of race and gender. But I did see that photograph, and I was deeply touched by it."....
===================================
Bash threw fast balls at Vance but threw softballs at Harris. Vance hit them out of the park and Harris struck out.
If this is not one of the most SISSIFIED PUSSY BOY posts in the history of JPP, I would like to know what is!

TRUMPTARD trying to convince us that he and his HORRIBLE CANDIDATES TRUMP AND J.D. FANCY PANTS, I MEAN VANCE, are victim's of the MEAN OLD PRESS- JUST A PICKIN' ON THEM!

Is anyone buying this CRYBABY BULLSHIT?

Please Sissies and CRYBABIES- Please respond!

Yes, please entertain this TRUMPTARD and make him feel relevant YALL!

Perhaps you can sooth his hopeless and helpless BUTT HURT ass!
 
Last edited:
If there was a difference, maybe it was because Harris hasn't said anything as nasty as "women who haven't children are cat ladies who live miserable lives" or "Democrats are anti-family" or put out a book criticizing people who live in Appalachia. Guys who try to elevate themselves by putting down others have it coming.
 
Did you notice that NONE of the usual bunch of "fact checkers" have done any fact checking on this interview? Factcheck.org barely could rise to mentioning it, while in their whole "fact check" couldn't bring themselves to call her the liar she is.


Snopes has ignored it.

Here's the non-response by Politifact


Newsweak, likewise, basically skirted the whole interview:


The WaPo's infamous "fact checker" is nowhere to be found.
 
She brought up the questions people wanted to hear - the position changes, Walz's service, et al.

People are just geared up to criticize. Trump has had it far easier w/ Fox & Friends, and Musk.
 
So, if Trump is so smart, Harris is such a moron, and the Trump campaign is NOT in disarray - why do you think Trump has lost so much ground in the polls?

Fake news?
All I asked for was you to provide a link to your claim that Trump's campaign is in disarray. I forget the fact you will keep yapping on and on.
 
Back
Top