Make no mistake about this. Judges are lawyers. As lawyers they are notorious for overcharging (RIPPING OFF) their clients. In the Judicial Travel Accountability Act taxpayers are the High Court’s clients.
Kevin Daley’s article is unclear, but I am pretty sure taxpayers are reimbursing somebody:
Take this one to the bank. Taxpayers paid the freight to teach non-existent International law. Before Justice Anthony Kennedy retired he taught International law in Salzburg, Austria for more than two decades. Justice Ginsberg joined Kennedy on several occasions.
Worse than teaching non-existent International law, justices getting a vote in cases involving International law is the closest thing to a crooked horse race you will ever find. It is a waste of time searching high and low for 5 out of 9 lawyers who will vote against anything found in an un-ratified United Nations Treaty, or vote against the legitimacy of a United Nations Tribunal.
XXXXX
What are the odds the SCOTUS will vote against something called International Environmental Law; i.e. United Nations Law?
For years, I have been saying that the EPA is a de facto U.N. bureaucracy. Now that the relationship between INTERPOL and the U.N. is less obscure than it was in the past, Obama’s reasons for inviting INTERPOL into this country are obvious. INTERPOL is here to oblige everything environmental freakazoids in organizations like Global E-Waste Crime Group inventing a crime.
And what in hell is a Global E-Waste Crime Group in the first place? The name sounds like Dick Tracy’s Crimestoppers from the old comic strip. It is certainly not crime as Americans understand crime, but it is crime as defined by America’s enemies. Inevitably, so-called environmental crimes will be tried in the U.N.’s judicial system. Boy, was that a surprise!
In 2010 INTERPOL pledged war on “environmental crime” whatever the hell that is. Bolivia’s President Evo Morales, a bedbug in his own right, even called for prosecuting criminal “countries” in the U.N.’s International Criminal Court. None other than Bolivia’s bedbug called for an International climate justice tribunal to punish environmental miscreants:
The United Nations arresting Americans in their own country is not possible without INTERPOL. Without INTERPOL a global climate court is as meaningless as is the rest of the U.N.’s judicial system —— The World Court, and its spinoffs, the International Criminal Court, special tribunals, and whatever else they can get away with.
To make it all work INTERPOL needed the authority to investigate American industries in order to charge them with an International environmental crime even if a targeted company did not violate American laws. When Obama amended President Reagan’s EO he handed INTERPOL the necessary authority.
QUESTION: Who will the U.N.’s court actually prosecute after INTERPOL makes the arrest? ANSWER: Every American that global government Communists want to silence and punish:
Finally, Evo Morales proved that displaced Communists flocked to environmental tax dollars paid to the United Nations after the Soviet Union imploded. Once Communists got behind environmental scams with the U.N.’s blessings there was no stopping the parasites. In October 2009, the U.N. General Assembly named Morales World Hero of Mother Earth.
In 2011:
Kevin Daley’s article is unclear, but I am pretty sure taxpayers are reimbursing somebody:
A new bill would require Supreme Court justices to disclose more information about privately funded travel, a lavish and much-enjoyed perk of service on the nation’s highest judicial tribunal.
Federal judges have relatively cursory reporting requirements for reimbursed travel as compared to the other branches of government. The justices are only obligated to provide the source and a brief description of reimbursements, but need not report dollar amounts or any gift received as “personal hospitality.”
The proposed Judicial Travel Accountability Act requires judicial officers to itemize privately funded travel, lodging and related expenses within 15 days of a trip’s end and provide detailed descriptions of meetings and events in which they participated. Democratic Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island is the lead Senate sponsor, while Democratic Rep. David Cicilline of Rhode Island is leading the House effort.
“Judges and justices receive free trips around the world, and the American people deserve to know in a timely manner how much the excursions cost and who’s paying,” Fix the Court executive director Gabe Roth said in a statement following introduction of the bill on Oct. 17. “Officials in the executive and legislative branches are already compelled to disclose this type of information, so there’s no reason judicial travel and gift reporting should remain exempt from accepted standards.”
Members of the Supreme Court are well-traveled by any objective standard. All nine justices reported reimbursed travel on their 2018 financial disclosures.
Federal judges have relatively cursory reporting requirements for reimbursed travel as compared to the other branches of government. The justices are only obligated to provide the source and a brief description of reimbursements, but need not report dollar amounts or any gift received as “personal hospitality.”
The proposed Judicial Travel Accountability Act requires judicial officers to itemize privately funded travel, lodging and related expenses within 15 days of a trip’s end and provide detailed descriptions of meetings and events in which they participated. Democratic Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island is the lead Senate sponsor, while Democratic Rep. David Cicilline of Rhode Island is leading the House effort.
“Judges and justices receive free trips around the world, and the American people deserve to know in a timely manner how much the excursions cost and who’s paying,” Fix the Court executive director Gabe Roth said in a statement following introduction of the bill on Oct. 17. “Officials in the executive and legislative branches are already compelled to disclose this type of information, so there’s no reason judicial travel and gift reporting should remain exempt from accepted standards.”
Members of the Supreme Court are well-traveled by any objective standard. All nine justices reported reimbursed travel on their 2018 financial disclosures.
Supreme Court Justices Enjoy A Lot Of Privately Funded Travel. Now Lawmakers Want To Know Who’s Paying
Kevin Daley
Supreme Court correspondent
October 20, 2019 7:29 PM ET
https://dailycaller.com/2019/10/20/scotus-travel-disclosure-bill/
Kevin Daley
Supreme Court correspondent
October 20, 2019 7:29 PM ET
https://dailycaller.com/2019/10/20/scotus-travel-disclosure-bill/
Take this one to the bank. Taxpayers paid the freight to teach non-existent International law. Before Justice Anthony Kennedy retired he taught International law in Salzburg, Austria for more than two decades. Justice Ginsberg joined Kennedy on several occasions.
Worse than teaching non-existent International law, justices getting a vote in cases involving International law is the closest thing to a crooked horse race you will ever find. It is a waste of time searching high and low for 5 out of 9 lawyers who will vote against anything found in an un-ratified United Nations Treaty, or vote against the legitimacy of a United Nations Tribunal.
Supreme Court Associate Justice Anthony M. Kennedy will teach for his 26th year in the University of the Pacific, McGeorge School of Law's annual Salzburg, Austria Summer Program, which runs from July 5 through July 24, 2015.
Justice Kennedy has taught in Salzburg Summer Program for all but one of the past 25 years.
Justice Kennedy has taught in Salzburg Summer Program for all but one of the past 25 years.
XXXXX
The three-week program in Salzburg offers international and comparative law courses in public and commercial law fields to law students who want to expand their understanding of international issues that increasingly impact legal practice everywhere. Pacific McGeorge Distinguished Professor John Sprankling will teach International Environmental Law.
Justice Kennedy to Teach in Summer Salzburg Program
March 12, 2015
http://www.mcgeorge.edu/News/Justice_Kennedy_to_Teach_in_Summer_Salzburg_Program.htm
March 12, 2015
http://www.mcgeorge.edu/News/Justice_Kennedy_to_Teach_in_Summer_Salzburg_Program.htm
What are the odds the SCOTUS will vote against something called International Environmental Law; i.e. United Nations Law?
For years, I have been saying that the EPA is a de facto U.N. bureaucracy. Now that the relationship between INTERPOL and the U.N. is less obscure than it was in the past, Obama’s reasons for inviting INTERPOL into this country are obvious. INTERPOL is here to oblige everything environmental freakazoids in organizations like Global E-Waste Crime Group inventing a crime.
And what in hell is a Global E-Waste Crime Group in the first place? The name sounds like Dick Tracy’s Crimestoppers from the old comic strip. It is certainly not crime as Americans understand crime, but it is crime as defined by America’s enemies. Inevitably, so-called environmental crimes will be tried in the U.N.’s judicial system. Boy, was that a surprise!
In 2010 INTERPOL pledged war on “environmental crime” whatever the hell that is. Bolivia’s President Evo Morales, a bedbug in his own right, even called for prosecuting criminal “countries” in the U.N.’s International Criminal Court. None other than Bolivia’s bedbug called for an International climate justice tribunal to punish environmental miscreants:
Morales asks to save Kyoto Protocol, create global climate court
Dec 9, 2010, 18:18 GMT
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2641022/posts
Dec 9, 2010, 18:18 GMT
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2641022/posts
The United Nations arresting Americans in their own country is not possible without INTERPOL. Without INTERPOL a global climate court is as meaningless as is the rest of the U.N.’s judicial system —— The World Court, and its spinoffs, the International Criminal Court, special tribunals, and whatever else they can get away with.
To make it all work INTERPOL needed the authority to investigate American industries in order to charge them with an International environmental crime even if a targeted company did not violate American laws. When Obama amended President Reagan’s EO he handed INTERPOL the necessary authority.
Last Thursday, December 17, 2009, The White House released an Executive Order "Amending Executive Order 12425." It grants INTERPOL (International Criminal Police Organization) a new level of full diplomatic immunity afforded to foreign embassies and select other "International Organizations" as set forth in the United States International Organizations Immunities Act of 1945.
By removing language from President Reagan's 1983 Executive Order 12425, this international law enforcement body now operates - now operates - on American soil beyond the reach of our own top law enforcement arm, the FBI, and is immune from Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) requests.
By removing language from President Reagan's 1983 Executive Order 12425, this international law enforcement body now operates - now operates - on American soil beyond the reach of our own top law enforcement arm, the FBI, and is immune from Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) requests.
Wither Sovereignty
Executive Order Amended to Immunize INTERPOL In America - Is The ICC Next?
By Steve Schippert, Clyde Middleton December 23, 2009
http://threatswatch.org/analysis/2009/12/wither-sovereignty/
Executive Order Amended to Immunize INTERPOL In America - Is The ICC Next?
By Steve Schippert, Clyde Middleton December 23, 2009
http://threatswatch.org/analysis/2009/12/wither-sovereignty/
QUESTION: Who will the U.N.’s court actually prosecute after INTERPOL makes the arrest? ANSWER: Every American that global government Communists want to silence and punish:
Anti-Greens are ‘Criminals’, According to Interpol, Environmental crime is a serious and growing international problem
The UN and Interpol How the UN will gain power
By Barry Napier Wednesday, December 30, 2009
https://canadafreepress.com/article/the-un-and-interpol-how-the-un-will-gain-power
The UN and Interpol How the UN will gain power
By Barry Napier Wednesday, December 30, 2009
https://canadafreepress.com/article/the-un-and-interpol-how-the-un-will-gain-power
Finally, Evo Morales proved that displaced Communists flocked to environmental tax dollars paid to the United Nations after the Soviet Union imploded. Once Communists got behind environmental scams with the U.N.’s blessings there was no stopping the parasites. In October 2009, the U.N. General Assembly named Morales World Hero of Mother Earth.
In 2011:
Bolivia will this month table a draft United Nations treaty giving "Mother Earth" the same rights as humans — having just passed a domestic law that does the same for bugs, trees and all other natural things in the South American country.
UN document would give 'Mother Earth' same rights as humans
By Steven Edwards, Postmedia News
April 13, 2011
http://www.canada.com/news/world/do...r+Earth+same+rights+humans/4597840/story.html
By Steven Edwards, Postmedia News
April 13, 2011
http://www.canada.com/news/world/do...r+Earth+same+rights+humans/4597840/story.html
