Do you deny that it is immoral to initiate the use of force (through physical violence or fraud) against others?
So, you would support the morality of someone walking up to you on the street, shoot you, and take your wallet.
Well, maybe you could help me out and clarify. It's a relatively simple moral question. You said that you deny the immorality of the initiation of the use of force. So, I simply applied it to an everyday situation.
People get robbed everyday. It is a simple application of the principle. Can you answer the question or no?
What is unclear about it? Do you support the initiation of force?
Well, I assume that you understand the meaning of the words, no?
Ad hominems are the hallmark of a weak argument. Do you not understand the meaning of the words, too?
If it helps, I assert it is a universal moral principle to oppose the initiation of violence against others. I oppose the initiation of violence through force or fraud. If something is not applied universally, it is not a moral principle; it would simply be a preference ala orange vs. yellow.
I would think that adults such as yourselves would be able to answer a simple question about the morality of the use of violence. Will you answer it?