Does Barack Obama have enough experience to be president?

midcan5

Member
Newt Gingrich, commenting on Obama's experience: "Well, Abraham Lincoln served two years in the U.S.House, and seemed to do all right."

Does Barack Obama have enough experience to be president? - Obamapedia

Following George W. Bush, who only served six years as the Governor of Texas before his presidency and hasn't been that well-received, to put it lightly, the American people should make sure they vote for a qualified candidate. And in their never ending coverage of Obama, the American media loves to repeat the "experience question." Barack, a political unknown until his Democratic National Convention Speech in 2004, has been portrayed as "green", the implication being that if he's elected president, he would somehow not be ready to handle the task of the presidency, or at least not as well as his political opponents.

He has ten years experience in public office, more than the two other leading Democratic candidates, Hillary Clinton (six-plus years as Senator from New York) and John Edwards (six years as Senator from North Carolina). Barack's first eight years spent in the Illinois senate before his two years (and counting) of service in the U.S. Senate, should not be forgotten. Far away from the Washington spotlight, he introduced, voted on and passed bills, debated with his colleagues—something that was missing in Washington, where everything is settled in the backroom—and arduously worked to satisfy his constituents. Most important of all, he learned that how to work across the aisle, and get stuff done.

"When you come in, especially as a freshman, and work on something like ethics reform, it's not necessarily a way to endear yourself to some of the veteran members of the Illinois General Assembly," said state Sen. Kirk W. Dillard, a Republican who became a friend. "And working on issues like racial profiling was contentious, but Barack had a way both intellectually and in demeanor that defused skeptics."


http://www.obamapedia.org/page/Does+Barack+Obama+have+enough+experience+to+be+president??t=anon
 
Reagan only had 8 years experience in office at the beginning of his presidency and NO FOREIGN POLICY experience.
 
There's no experience that can be said to adequately prepare a person for the presidency, and anyone who says they are prepared is lying. You must simply choose who is the best leader, and who will implement the policies that you prefer.
 
Experience is overrated in elections. The transition team, meetings with the current president, and hundreds of advisors helps ensure any President, as devoid of tradition or intellect as may be the case, can hold the office and exercise its duties.

Kennedy was less than a blip on the radar screen when he ran for President. Reagan had no foreign policy experience, Clinton, Carter, FDR and the list goes on. No president can prepare for the political battles of domestic policy.

Obama is absolutely qualified. He's a visionary with cogent ideas, and an affable means of befriending anyone, of any party. He is a man who has united people from both sides of the aisle, he's been a public servant for a decade, and has been active in foreign policy in his short time as Senator.

Obama could be just as effective, experience-wise, as Clinton or McCain.



Bill
 
From his speeches and such it is clear that Obama has a better grasp on reality than our current president. And he has been in there nigh onto 8 years.
 
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kKavhtNuYbk"]YouTube - Chocolate Rain w / Barack Obama as the Dancing Baby[/ame]
 
Back
Top