“As if it did not have enough on its plate, the majority turns itself into the country’s administrative czar,” she wrote.
For 40 years, she wrote, the Chevron doctrine, set out by the same supreme court in a 1984 ruling, had supported regulatory efforts by the US government by granting federal experts the ability to make reasonable decisions where congressional law was ambiguous. She gave a few examples of the work that was facilitated as a result, such as “keeping air and water clean, food and drugs safe, and financial markets honest”.
www.theguardian.com
For 40 years, she wrote, the Chevron doctrine, set out by the same supreme court in a 1984 ruling, had supported regulatory efforts by the US government by granting federal experts the ability to make reasonable decisions where congressional law was ambiguous. She gave a few examples of the work that was facilitated as a result, such as “keeping air and water clean, food and drugs safe, and financial markets honest”.
![www.theguardian.com](https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/e029ae94be2239afa33790cd3507fcad87239510/1141_88_2980_1787/master/2980.jpg?width=1200&height=630&quality=85&auto=format&fit=crop&overlay-align=bottom%2Cleft&overlay-width=100p&overlay-base64=L2ltZy9zdGF0aWMvb3ZlcmxheXMvdGctZGVmYXVsdC5wbmc&enable=upscale&s=f5294b5e04a2a5135981a0d6a57247eb)
Elena Kagan’s scathing Chevron dissent highlights US supreme court’s disregard for precedent
The court is turning into ‘an administrative czar’, says liberal justice after 40-year-old doctrine is overturned