You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Even Jimmy Carter dislikes Hillary Clinton
- Thread starter Rjohnson
- Start date
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Even former President Jimmy Carter dislikes Hillary Clinton. These were his exact words: "The novelty of electing the first woman President of America should not outweigh our duty of electing an honest and ethical President".
Reading between the lines, he us saying that she is neither of those and therefore shouldn't be elected.
Sent from my LENOVO Lenovo K50-t5 Using Ez Forum for Android
all the Clintonistas act like it HAS to BE HILLARY for a woman POTUS- in truth it would happen anyhow without her.
As Carter says
"The novelty of electing the first woman President of America should not outweigh our duty of electing an honest and ethical President".
wait till next cycle when there is someone competent and ethical -at least not a full scale liar
As Carter says
"The novelty of electing the first woman President of America should not outweigh our duty of electing an honest and ethical President".
wait till next cycle when there is someone competent and ethical -at least not a full scale liar
Cancel 2016.11
Darla
Look at the little rage furbies getting their 2 inch dicks all excited. Jimmy Carter even said Hillary is dishonest!
No.
No.
Cancel 2016.11
Darla
I think this thread tells you everything you need to know. I don't know who the first clown is, but he makes a claim and two of the biggest misogynistic woman-haters on the board rush on to say "HALLELUJAH BROTHER!!"
Do they even bother checking to see if it's true?
No. Because they don't care.
And others here actually believe one word these tiny dicked rage furbies post.
Do they even bother checking to see if it's true?
No. Because they don't care.
And others here actually believe one word these tiny dicked rage furbies post.
we have to pause for a moment and assess how Clinton has actually responded to the email scandal.
First of all, there is ample evidence she simply lied. A lot.
We know that she originally stated she used a private server to allow her to email from one device. That has been proven false.
We know that despite apologizing for poor judgment, she has consistently passed the blame onto others, suggesting that her colleagues were the ones who should have known the rules.
We also know that she has really refused to take seriously the idea that sensitive and classified information was mishandled and that that information may have actually been leaked.
Most importantly we have clear evidence that she has handled this mess with spin and rhetoric more than actual leadership.
Taken together those behaviors might not make her a criminal–although there is some real doubt on that point — but I believe it is fairly clear that they suggest serious flaws in a future president.
The point is that it is time to revise Bernie Sanders’ statement that “we are sick and tired of hearing about her damn emails.”
Even if the whole investigation was politically motivated, it turns out that there are some legitimate things to worry about.
As Lee Camp explains on Redacted Tonight, the actual content of the emails is real cause for concern.
That’s not even mentioning the whole host of other Clinton practices—her hawkishness, pro-Wall Street record, cronyism, etc. — that are worth critiquing.
There is one additional disturbing consequence to the Hillary bashing blowback, though.
It is not just the fact that the anti-Hillary and pro-Hillary sides have become completely incapable of nuance or reason; it is the fact that those of us advocating for critical thinking are increasingly stuck in defensive positions that lead us to become more and more intransigent, more and more angry, and more and more inclined to bully back.
In one example, Trevor Noah attempted to cover the story with some nuance, but he still ended up calling Hillary “Grandma Nixon.”The Nixon analogy might be apt, but calling her Grandma smacks of Limbaugh.
Whether fair or not, the Clinton campaign may get credit for finally driving the nation fully into sectarian opposition and away from anything resembling healthy democratic debate. The real question is whether we will find any productive way to talk about it.
http://www.salon.com/2016/07/12/the...rt_reasonable_criticism_of_clintons_campaign/
First of all, there is ample evidence she simply lied. A lot.
We know that she originally stated she used a private server to allow her to email from one device. That has been proven false.
We know that despite apologizing for poor judgment, she has consistently passed the blame onto others, suggesting that her colleagues were the ones who should have known the rules.
We also know that she has really refused to take seriously the idea that sensitive and classified information was mishandled and that that information may have actually been leaked.
Most importantly we have clear evidence that she has handled this mess with spin and rhetoric more than actual leadership.
Taken together those behaviors might not make her a criminal–although there is some real doubt on that point — but I believe it is fairly clear that they suggest serious flaws in a future president.
The point is that it is time to revise Bernie Sanders’ statement that “we are sick and tired of hearing about her damn emails.”
Even if the whole investigation was politically motivated, it turns out that there are some legitimate things to worry about.
As Lee Camp explains on Redacted Tonight, the actual content of the emails is real cause for concern.
That’s not even mentioning the whole host of other Clinton practices—her hawkishness, pro-Wall Street record, cronyism, etc. — that are worth critiquing.
There is one additional disturbing consequence to the Hillary bashing blowback, though.
It is not just the fact that the anti-Hillary and pro-Hillary sides have become completely incapable of nuance or reason; it is the fact that those of us advocating for critical thinking are increasingly stuck in defensive positions that lead us to become more and more intransigent, more and more angry, and more and more inclined to bully back.
In one example, Trevor Noah attempted to cover the story with some nuance, but he still ended up calling Hillary “Grandma Nixon.”The Nixon analogy might be apt, but calling her Grandma smacks of Limbaugh.
Whether fair or not, the Clinton campaign may get credit for finally driving the nation fully into sectarian opposition and away from anything resembling healthy democratic debate. The real question is whether we will find any productive way to talk about it.
http://www.salon.com/2016/07/12/the...rt_reasonable_criticism_of_clintons_campaign/