I would have liked to have been a fly on the wall at Hillary's post Iowa campaign meeting. I hope she comes in third in NH again.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/new_hampshire-primary.html
Found em. Rasmussen, and American Resource Group. All the others have it between one and two percent. It averages to 2%...
And two of them show Clinton winning by more than 5%. And yes they were all new polls.
And the Iowa Caucus was when? All of the polls listed include polls after the Iowa Caucus.As I suggested in the thread title, the only polls that matter now, are the post-iowa polls. Because Iowa changes the whole dynamic.
So, throw out those polls that were done before or during the Iowa caucus. All the post-caucus polls show Obama clobbering hillary. By 10 to 12 points. Only CNN has them tied.
And the Iowa Caucus was when? All of the polls listed include polls after the Iowa Caucus.
Yeah... Then you have a huge dichotomy of information.Throw out every poll that has at least some data from before January 4. Because it will include a sample of people who aren't aware of the iowa results.
Rasmussen Poll: Obama Takes Big Lead In New Hampshire
By Eric Kleefeld - January 5, 2008, 2:36PM
Barack Obama has taken a huge lead in the first pure post-Iowa poll of New Hampshire. Rasmussen gives Obama 37%, Hillary Clinton 27%, John Edwards 19%, and Bill Richardson 8%. Rasmussen's last poll from two weeks ago had Clinton at 31%, Obama 28%, Edwards 18%, and Richardson 6%.
On the Republican side: John McCain 31%, Mitt Romney 26%, Ron Paul 14%, Mike Huckabee 11%, Rudy Giuliani 8%, and Fred Thompson 5%. Two weeks ago it was Romney 31%, McCain 27%, Giuliani 13%, Huckabee 11%, Paul 7%, and Thompson 5%.