For you idiots, the alleged crimes!

Jarod

Jarod

Well-known member
Contributor
So you Trumppers can stop asking!

In NY a GJ charged Trump with 34 counts of falsifying business records. All felonies.

Stop pretending that he was not charged with a crime, you are making fools of yourselves.

175.10
Falsifying business records in the first degree
Penal (PEN) CHAPTER 40, PART 3, TITLE K, ARTICLE 175

§ 175.10 Falsifying business records in the first degree.

A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree
when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second
degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit
another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.

Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.
 
"...
nd when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit
another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof."

Where's the OTHER CRIME, dumbfuck.
 
Jarod said:
So you Trumppers can stop asking!

In NY a GJ charged Trump with 34 counts of falsifying business records. All felonies.

Stop pretending that he was not charged with a crime, you are making fools of yourselves.

175.10
Falsifying business records in the first degree
Penal (PEN) CHAPTER 40, PART 3, TITLE K, ARTICLE 175

§ 175.10 Falsifying business records in the first degree.

A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree
when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second
degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit
another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.

Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.
Click to expand...

Fits you perfectly,​


Word of the Day – Spuddle,​

Spuddle (verb) (archaic)​

spud-l
to work feebly and ineffectively, because your mind is elsewhere or you haven’t quite woken up yet.
Late 17th century, still in use in parts of the West Country.





​

 
Last edited:
Jarod said:
So you Trumppers can stop asking!

In NY a GJ charged Trump with 34 counts of falsifying business records. All felonies.

Stop pretending that he was not charged with a crime, you are making fools of yourselves.

175.10
Falsifying business records in the first degree
Penal (PEN) CHAPTER 40, PART 3, TITLE K, ARTICLE 175

§ 175.10 Falsifying business records in the first degree.

A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree
when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second
degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit
another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.

Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.
Click to expand...
:yayaseesathreadban: :clinton: :magagrin:
 
Jarod is acting very triggerdly because everyone is making fun of his trial threads and clowning him. Whats this now? The 147th thread of his on the same subject ? Poor little guy.......:laugh:
 
Jarod said:
So you Trumppers can stop asking!

In NY a GJ charged Trump with 34 counts of falsifying business records. All felonies.
Click to expand...

How are they felonies?

Jarod said:
Stop pretending that he was not charged with a crime, you are making fools of yourselves.
Click to expand...

I think you should stop pretending you know what you're talking about.

Jarod said:
175.10
Falsifying business records in the first degree
Penal (PEN) CHAPTER 40, PART 3, TITLE K, ARTICLE 175
Click to expand...

What was false about the payments to an attorney? How should they be classified if not "attorney fees?"

Jarod said:
§ 175.10 Falsifying business records in the first degree.

A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree
when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second
degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit
another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.
Click to expand...

What was the "other" crime?

Jarod said:
Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.
Click to expand...

Again, what crime? The business records were accurate. So how were they felonious?
 
Stone said:
Jarod is acting very triggerdly because everyone is making fun of his trial threads and clowning him. Whats this now? The 147th thread of his on the same subject ? Poor little guy.......:laugh:
Click to expand...

He's desperately flailing trying to pretend that this political clown show trial is a serious issue. It's rather sad. Imagine how severely triggered he will be when Trump wins in November. I hope he stocks up on his meds. :laugh:
 
Grokmaster said:
"...
nd when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit
another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof."

Where's the OTHER CRIME, dumbfuck.
Click to expand...
Prosecutors have suggested three possible crimes since filing the charges against Mr. Trump last year: a federal campaign finance violation, tax fraud and a state election-law crime. But since the start of the trial, they have largely focused on the state election-law crime: conspiracy to promote or prevent election.
 
Jarod said:
Prosecutors have suggested three possible crimes since filing the charges against Mr. Trump last year: a federal campaign finance violation, tax fraud and a state election-law crime. But since the start of the trial, they have largely focused on the state election-law crime: conspiracy to promote or prevent election.
Click to expand...
One cannoit be convicted of "three possble crimes" you moron. The crime must be proven beyong the shadow of a dooubt...not "suggestede" to find guilt.
 
Jarod said:
Only the crime charged must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. This just might be too complex for you.
Click to expand...
From your post: " Prosecutors have suggested three possible crimes since filing the charges against Mr. Trump last year:"

"Suggested " is NOT CHARGED is it, dumbfuck ?

No underlying crime = business records are immaterial.
"
When Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg first brought charges against Donald Trump in March 2023, the legal theory behind the indictment remained remarkably unclear. Bragg had charged Trump under New York Penal Law § 175.10, falsifying business records in the first degree. The falsification of business records alone is a misdemeanor under § 175.05—but Bragg had boosted the charge to a felony by alleging that Trump fudged the records with the “intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commission thereof.” But what other crime? The indictment didn’t say.

Now, a year later, with the trial finally underway, Bragg’s legal theory has come into focus—if you know where to look. The charges against Trump still have an oddly inchoate quality, thanks to Bragg’s decision to charge § 175.10 without also charging alongside it the offense that elevated the alleged business records violation to a felony."
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top