Freddie Mac (FRE) secretly paid a Republican consulting firm $2 million to kill ...

uscitizen

Villified User
AP IMPACT: Mortgage firm arranged stealth campaign


Oct 19, 1:47 PM (ET)

By PETE YOST


WASHINGTON (AP) - Freddie Mac (FRE) secretly paid a Republican consulting firm $2 million to kill legislation that would have regulated and trimmed the mortgage finance giant and its sister company, Fannie Mae (FNM), three years before the government took control to prevent their collapse.

In the cross hairs of the campaign carried out by DCI of Washington were Republican senators and a regulatory overhaul bill sponsored by Sen. Chuck Hagel, R-Neb. DCI's chief executive is Doug Goodyear, whom John McCain's campaign later hired to manage the GOP convention in September.

Freddie Mac's payments to DCI began shortly after the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee sent Hagel's bill to the then GOP-run Senate on July 28, 2005. All GOP members of the committee supported it; all Democrats opposed it.

In the midst of DCI's yearlong effort, Hagel and 25 other Republican senators pleaded unsuccessfully with Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., to allow a vote.

"If effective regulatory reform legislation ... is not enacted this year, American taxpayers will continue to be exposed to the enormous risk that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac pose to the housing market, the overall financial system and the economy as a whole," the senators wrote in a letter that proved prescient.

Unknown to the senators, DCI was undermining support for the bill in a campaign targeting 17 Republican senators in 13 states, according to documents obtained by The Associated Press. The states and the senators targeted changed over time, but always stayed on the Republican side.

In the end, there was not enough Republican support for Hagel's bill to warrant bringing it up for a vote because Democrats also opposed it and the votes of some would be needed for passage. The measure died at the end of the 109th Congress.

McCain, R-Ariz., was not a target of the DCI campaign. He signed Hagel's letter and three weeks later signed on as a co-sponsor of the bill.

By the time McCain did so, however, DCI's effort had gone on for nine months and was on its way toward killing the bill.

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20081019/D93TN71O0.html
 
So, is this somehow surprising? Freddy did not want to be regulated. Tghe republicans wanted to regulate them, the democrats did not. So who did Freddy target? Why, a consultancy that had some influence with republicans. Why spend money on people already on your side?

It does not change the fact that republicans wanted some oversight to head off the disaster they foresaw while democrats wanted Freddy and Fanny maximum leeway to continue their program of getting lower middle class people into home ownership.

It does not change the fact that the crisis was the result of bipartisan efforts, with the democrats pushing high-risk loans for the purpose of home ownership and other high-risk credit to support the economy, and republicans using the push for high risk lending to justify deregulation.

Nor does it change the fact that McCain is completely clueless so resorts to tired old rhetoric while Obama is a pre-trade throwback whose policies are a disaster in the waiting.
 
AP IMPACT: Mortgage firm arranged stealth campaign


Oct 19, 1:47 PM (ET)

By PETE YOST


WASHINGTON (AP) - Freddie Mac (FRE) secretly paid a Republican consulting firm $2 million to kill legislation that would have regulated and trimmed the mortgage finance giant and its sister company, Fannie Mae (FNM), three years before the government took control to prevent their collapse.

In the cross hairs of the campaign carried out by DCI of Washington were Republican senators and a regulatory overhaul bill sponsored by Sen. Chuck Hagel, R-Neb. DCI's chief executive is Doug Goodyear, whom John McCain's campaign later hired to manage the GOP convention in September.

Freddie Mac's payments to DCI began shortly after the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee sent Hagel's bill to the then GOP-run Senate on July 28, 2005. All GOP members of the committee supported it; all Democrats opposed it.

In the midst of DCI's yearlong effort, Hagel and 25 other Republican senators pleaded unsuccessfully with Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., to allow a vote.

"If effective regulatory reform legislation ... is not enacted this year, American taxpayers will continue to be exposed to the enormous risk that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac pose to the housing market, the overall financial system and the economy as a whole," the senators wrote in a letter that proved prescient.

Unknown to the senators, DCI was undermining support for the bill in a campaign targeting 17 Republican senators in 13 states, according to documents obtained by The Associated Press. The states and the senators targeted changed over time, but always stayed on the Republican side.

In the end, there was not enough Republican support for Hagel's bill to warrant bringing it up for a vote because Democrats also opposed it and the votes of some would be needed for passage. The measure died at the end of the 109th Congress.

McCain, R-Ariz., was not a target of the DCI campaign. He signed Hagel's letter and three weeks later signed on as a co-sponsor of the bill.

By the time McCain did so, however, DCI's effort had gone on for nine months and was on its way toward killing the bill.

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20081019/D93TN71O0.html


Don't tell Damocles. According to him, it was all the Democrats' fault.
 
So, is this somehow surprising? Freddy did not want to be regulated. Tghe republicans wanted to regulate them, the democrats did not. So who did Freddy target? Why, a consultancy that had some influence with republicans. Why spend money on people already on your side?

It does not change the fact that republicans wanted some oversight to head off the disaster they foresaw while democrats wanted Freddy and Fanny maximum leeway to continue their program of getting lower middle class people into home ownership.

It does not change the fact that the crisis was the result of bipartisan efforts, with the democrats pushing high-risk loans for the purpose of home ownership and other high-risk credit to support the economy, and republicans using the push for high risk lending to justify deregulation.

Nor does it change the fact that McCain is completely clueless so resorts to tired old rhetoric while Obama is a pre-trade throwback whose policies are a disaster in the waiting.

Damn, that is a great post Good Luck and truly spot on.
 
Back
Top