GOP campaign downplays Palin book-banning inquiry

Socrtease

Verified User
By GARANCE BURKE, Associated Press Writer
Fri Sep 12, 11:59 AM ET



WASILLA, Alaska - The McCain campaign is defending Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's much-criticized inquiry into banning books at her hometown library, saying her questions were only hypothetical.

Shortly after taking office in 1996 as mayor of Wasilla, a city of about 7,000 people, Palin asked the city's head librarian about banning books. Later, the librarian was notified by Palin that she was being fired, although Palin backed off under pressure.

Palin's alleged attempt at book-banning has been a matter of intense interest since Republican presidential nominee John McCain named her as his running mate last month.

Taylor Griffin, a spokesman for the McCain campaign, said Thursday that Palin asked the head librarian, Mary Ellen Emmons, on three occasions how she would react to attempts at banning books. He said the questions, in the fall of 1996, were hypothetical and entirely appropriate. He said a patron had asked the library to remove a title the year before and the mayor wanted to understand how such disputes were handled.

Records on the city's Web site, however, do not show any books were challenged in Wasilla in the 10 years before Palin took office.

Palin notified Emmons she would be fired in January 1997 because the mayor didn't feel she had the librarian's "full support." Emmons was reinstated the next day after public outcry, according to newspaper reports at the time.

Still, one longtime library staffer recalls that the run-in made everyone fear for their jobs.

"Mayor Palin gave us some terrible moments and some rather gut-wrenching moments, particularly when Mary Ellen said she was going to have to leave," said Cathy Petrie, who managed the children's collection at the time.

Recent outrage has been fueled by Wasilla housewife Anne Kilkenny, whose 2,400-word critique of Palin's legacy as mayor is widely posted on the Internet. Kilkenny described Palin's actions as "out-and-out censorship."

But the McCain campaign, in a statement, said the charge "is categorically false ... Governor Sarah Palin has never asked anyone to ban a book, period."

Emmons, a former Alaska Library Association president who now goes by Mary Ellen Baker, did not return calls seeking comment.

According to the Mat-Su Valley Frontiersman newspaper, Emmons did not mince words when Palin asked her "how I would deal with her saying a book can't be in the library" on Oct. 28, 1996, in a week when the mayor had asked department heads for letters of resignation.

"She asked me if I would object to censorship, and I replied 'Yup'," Emmons told a reporter. "And I told her it would not be just me. This was a constitutional question, and the American Civil Liberties Union would get involved, too."

The Rev. Howard Bess, a liberal Christian preacher in the nearby town of Palmer, said the church Palin and her family attended until 2002, the Wasilla Assembly of God, was pushing to remove his book from local bookstores.

Emmons told him that year that several copies of "Pastor I Am Gay" had disappeared from the library shelves, Bess said.

"Sarah brought pressure on the library about things she didn't like," Bess said. "To believe that my book was not targeted in this is a joke."

Other locals said the dust-up had been blown out of proportion.

"That was many years ago and Sarah never had any intention to ban books," said David Chappel, who served as Palin's deputy mayor for three years. "There were some vocal people in the minority, and it looks like they're still out there."

Jim Rettig, a University of Richmond librarian who heads the Chicago-based American Library Association, suggested that lingering quarrel raises issues that are still relevant as librarians prepare to celebrate Banned Books Week later this month.

"Librarians are very committed to the principles of the First Amendment of the Constitution and that means we don't allow one individual or a group of people to dictate what people can or cannot read," he said. "Most librarians if they got that sort of a question would be curious as to what the intent of the questioner was."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080912/ap_on_el_pr/palin_librarian
 
So did factcheck.org


It depends on what you think they were debunking. That facts of the matter are that Palin asked the librarian about "removing" books from the library on at least three occasions. The librarian flatly rejected even the possibility. The librarian was fired. The librarian was rehired shortly thereafter due to public outcry.

So, I guess it is technically correct that she didn't threaten to fire the librarian for refusing to ban books. And I suppose it is technically correct that Palin never specifically asked the librarian to ban any books. And I suppose it is technically correct that the librarian was fired for not being "supportive enough" of the mayor.

In the end though, only book banners bring up banning books. Only book banners fire librarians for not being "supportive enough" of the mayor. Hence, she's a book banner.
 
I guess I don't see how asking a hypothetical question gets one branded a book banner. If she had specifically asked the librarian to do so then I agree with you. She didn't though.
 
Really, how does a librarian show support for the Mayor? Was there some other policy or project that Palin had in regards to the library that could explain this? If McCain/Palin cannot offer on then the simplest explanation is that she fired her for not supporting a book ban.
 
So she wasn't supportive enough of the mayor (because she told Palin banning books was unthinkable).

Alright....
 
I can understand the "lack of support" line for firing the police chief. That's a key part of a mayor's job. But it simply does not float for a librarian because it not an area that Mayor's take a very active role in managing.
 
I can understand the "lack of support" line for firing the police chief. That's a key part of a mayor's job. But it simply does not float for a librarian because it not an area that Mayor's take a very active role in managing.

... unless they intend to do something with the library system... an intention that might have been foreshadowed by a phone call asking about banning books.
 
I guess I don't see how asking a hypothetical question gets one branded a book banner. If she had specifically asked the librarian to do so then I agree with you. She didn't though.


People that aren't interested in banning books (and there is little gray area here) don't ask how one might go about banning books or how a librarian feels about it. Book banners do that.
 
Carwacko, you can't be serious. She asks about a "hypothetically" completely unamerican idea like BANNING FUCKING BOOKS, and when the librarian says "yep" she would have a problem with BANNING FUCKING BOOKS she is told she is going to be terminated because she doesn't support the Fuerer um I mean the mayor. What sort of support was it she wasn't supporting the mayor on. Did she not want the bookmobile to be run on natural gas instead of diesel? Perhaps she didn't like the new color scheme for the library? Face facts, the woman wanted queer friendly books off of "her" library,(bet she calls it the liberry. Can't be very well read wanting to ban books)shelves and discovered that her form of totalitarian censorship was not practiced by the liberrian. And as for factcheck saying it was a lie as well, guess we shouldn't always put our eggs in one factcheck basket huh?
 
Why would anyone even ask if books could be removed from the library ?

Intent is the issue in this matter with palin, not the measure of her success.
 
what is amazing is that now that not even the GOP is denying this story the apologists have quit even talking about it in hopes it will die and they won't have to defend her authoritarian leanings
 
yeah the fact that she asked. Kinda like asking how sex is with a child...Why would you ask such a thing, if you did not have an intent ?

also the firing of the librarian is suspect, all things considered.
 
Back
Top