Heels Up Harris speech fact checked

Did anyone fact check Trump's claim from the day before that Harris met w/ Putin 3 days before he attacked the Ukraine and failed to talk him out of it?
 
Did anyone fact check Trump's claim from the day before that Harris met w/ Putin 3 days before he attacked the Ukraine and failed to talk him out of it?
Dear idiot, THIS thread is about Heels Up Harris and the claims she made last night done by the BBC. There are at least a thousand OP's started by the likes of Cypuss, the receptionist at a call center, and yourself, all bitching about Trump. Hop on one of those and vent your tiny heart away.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TOP
Dear idiot, THIS thread is about Heels Up Harris and the claims she made last night done by the BBC. There are at least a thousand OP's started by the likes of Cypuss, the receptionist at a call center, and yourself, all bitching about Trump. Hop on one of those and vent your tiny heart away.

So, I guess no one fact checked that yet.
 
Did anyone fact check Trump's claim from the day before that Harris met w/ Putin 3 days before he attacked the Ukraine and failed to talk him out of it?
^^DEFLECTION^^

This thread is about if fact checkers think Kamala LIED to you in her speech. If you have issues with Trump's claims then you are free to start a thread on the topic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TOP
Did anyone fact check Trump's claim from the day before that Harris met w/ Putin 3 days before he attacked the Ukraine and failed to talk him out of it?

Trump wasn't giving a speech - heels up was.

She said "Trump would release violent protestors from prison."

Yet it was Harris who released the CHAZ/CHOP insurrectionists after they took Seattle by force of arms and held it for 10 weeks using gunt - with 8 people dead and 17 shot.

See, Harris isn't just a liar - which she (her handlers) surely is - she is a mockery of reality - the exact opposite of the truth, claiming Trump might do what she actually DID do.
 
So how did the fact checking go? Let's see. A total of four alleged facts are "checked". Two of the four check true. The other two are Project 2025 "facts" and Trump has not officially endorsed Project 2025 so if you are comfortable with that strained distinction you may treat these two as "misleading".
OK, I will.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TOP
The last three are true.

You sure lie a lot - but you're a Communist - so lying is your way.

{Other estimates are lower. The Peterson Institute reckons the impact would be closer to $1,700 a year.

Trump insists the cost of his tariffs would be felt by foreign countries instead.

It is difficult to assess the exact impact of these taxes but studies, on previous tariffs, have suggested that some of the cost was passed on to American businesses and consumers.}

#3 you lied about.

{The majority of lawmakers in the US Senate opposed the proposed measures. Trump did not have a vote, but he did call for his Republican lawmakers to oppose it.}

#4 you lied about.

Again, you're a Marxist democrat - you lie about anything that might expose your filthy party. Yours is a party of psychopaths - devoid of integrity.
 
You sure lie a lot - but you're a Communist - so lying is your way.

{Other estimates are lower. The Peterson Institute reckons the impact would be closer to $1,700 a year.

Trump insists the cost of his tariffs would be felt by foreign countries instead.

It is difficult to assess the exact impact of these taxes but studies, on previous tariffs, have suggested that some of the cost was passed on to American businesses and consumers.}

#3 you lied about.

{The majority of lawmakers in the US Senate opposed the proposed measures. Trump did not have a vote, but he did call for his Republican lawmakers to oppose it.}

#4 you lied about.

Again, you're a Marxist democrat - you lie about anything that might expose your filthy party. Yours is a party of psychopaths - devoid of integrity.
Lol
 
I actually like the BBC fact checkers, Jake Horton & Lucy Gilder. And I can appreciated what they are saying here. In fact, they are only saying that a couple of things Kamala said in her acceptance speech were misleading. SO YES! EVERYONE! DO PLEASE READ THEIR OPED!

Because all they are saying here is that Kamala was basing what she said about Trump banning abortions nationwide, and Trump banning Birth Control, was based on the Project 2025 manifesto. And they said that Trump has tried to distance himself with the Project 2025 manifesto.

SO I AM JUST GOING TO SAY THIS- THIS BBC oped IS BASICALLY JUST AS MISLEADING- BECAUSE WE ALREADY KNOW THAT TRUMP LIED TO US ABOUT NOT KNOWING ANYTHING ABOUT THE PROJECT 2025 MANIFESTO.
AND TO TOP THAT, TRUMP SAYING HE DOES NOT KNOW ABOUT THE PROJECT 2025 IS NOT JUST MISLEADING, IT IS A BOLD FACE LIE.

AND HERE IS THE FACT- KAMALA ADMITTED THAT BASED ON THE PROJECT 2025 MANIFESTO, TRUMP WOULD BAN ABORTIONS FEDERALLY, AND BAN BIRTH CONTROL.
SO SHE WAS NOT TRYING TO MISLEAD ANYONE- AS SHE QUOTED HER SOURCE FOR HER COMMENTS.


DONALD TRUMP'S V.P. CHOICE- J.D. VANCE WROTE THE FORWARD FOR THE PROJECT 2025 MANIFESTO, AND THAT THE AUTHOR OF THE PROJECT 2025 MANIFESTO- KEVIN ROBERTS WAS TRUMP'S MAIN CONTRIBUTION CONTRIBUTOR TO HIS CAMPAIGN, AND THAT HE IS ON TRUMP'S SHORTLIST TO BE TRUMP'S WHITE HOUSE CHIEF OF STAFF.

Six of his former Cabinet secretaries helped write or collaborated on the 900-page playbook for a second Trump term published by the Heritage Foundation. Four individuals Trump nominated as ambassadors were also involved, along with several enforcers of his controversial immigration crackdown. And about 20 pages are credited to his first deputy chief of staff.

In fact, at least 140 people who worked in the Trump administration had a hand in Project 2025, a CNN review found, including more than half of the people listed as authors, editors and contributors to “Mandate for Leadership,” the project’s extensive manifesto for overhauling the executive branch.

Dozens more who staffed Trump’s government hold positions with conservative groups advising Project 2025, including his former chief of staff Mark Meadows and longtime adviser Stephen Miller. These groups also include several lawyers deeply involved in Trump’s attempts to remain in power, such as his impeachment attorney Jay Sekulow and two of the legal architects of his failed bid to overturn the 2020 presidential election, Cleta Mitchell and John Eastman.

To quantify the scope of the involvement from Trump’s orbit, online biographies, LinkedIn profiles and news clippings for more than 1,000 people listed on published directories for the 110 organizations on Project 2025’s advisory board, as well as the 200-plus names credited with working on “Mandate for Leadership.”

Overall, 240 people with ties to both Project 2025 and to Trump, covering nearly every aspect of his time in politics and the White House – from day-to-day foot soldiers in Washington to the highest levels of his government. The number is likely higher because many individuals’ online résumés were not available.

In addition to people who worked directly for Trump, others who participated in Project 2025 were appointed by the former president to independent positions. For instance, Federal Communications Commissioner Brendan Carr authored an entire chapter of proposed changes to his agency, and Lisa Correnti, an anti-abortion advocate Trump appointed as a delegate to the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women, is among the contributors.

Several people involved in Project 2025 didn’t serve in the Trump administration but were influential in shaping his first term. One example is former US Attorney Brett Tolman, a leading force behind the former president’s criminal justice reform law who later helped arrange a pardon for Charles Kushner, the father of Trump’s son-in-law. Tolman is listed as a contributor to “Mandate for Leadership.”

The extensive overlap between Project 2025 and Trump’s universe of allies, advisers and former staff complicates his efforts to distance himself from the work. Trump’s campaign has sought for months to make clear that Project 2025 doesn’t speak for them amid an intensifying push by President Joe Biden and Democrats to tie the Republican standard bearer to the playbook’s more controversial policies.

SO, NOT TO WORRY, BECAUSE I AM HERE TO CLEAR UP ANYTHING THE BBC SAID WAS MISLEADING!
 
Last edited:
Back
Top