Hillary's Goal: Build Mosques

DamnYankee

DamnYankee

Loyal to the end
Just a cursory search of the term “mosque” on the State Department’s list of “projects” reveals 26 examples of federal funds going to fund construction, renovation, and rehabilitation of various mosques abroad. The benefiting countries include Bulgaria, Pakistan, Mali, Tunisia, Afghanistan, Benin, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Albania, Egypt, Tunisia, the Maldives, Yemen, Turkmenistan, Tanzania, Uganda, Azerbaijan, Sudan, Serbia and Montenegro.

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2010/08/24/u...ehabilitation-around-the-world/#ixzz0yOr20IYM

I don't see the ACLU fuming about "separation of church and state".
 
Damn Yankee said:
Just a cursory search of the term “mosque” on the State Department’s list of “projects” reveals 26 examples of federal funds going to fund construction, renovation, and rehabilitation of various mosques abroad. The benefiting countries include Bulgaria, Pakistan, Mali, Tunisia, Afghanistan, Benin, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Albania, Egypt, Tunisia, the Maldives, Yemen, Turkmenistan, Tanzania, Uganda, Azerbaijan, Sudan, Serbia and Montenegro.

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2010/08/24/u...ehabilitation-around-the-world/#ixzz0yOr20IYM

I don't see the ACLU fuming about "separation of church and state".
Click to expand...

This should be a crime.

How long has this been going on?

Does the ACLU get gov't funding?
 
given this became acceptable under the bush admin...how is it that obama's admin is abusing this?


In a document provided on Monday to Indiana Republican Sen. Richard G. Lugar, ranking member of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, the State Department explained that the practice of funding such projects became acceptable in 2003 when the Justice Department declared that the U.S. Constitution’s Establishment Clause did not preclude federal funds from going to preserve religious structures if they had cultural importance.

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2010/08/24/u...ehabilitation-around-the-world/#ixzz0yQcklW28
 
Yurt said:
given this became acceptable under the bush admin...how is it that obama's admin is abusing this?


In a document provided on Monday to Indiana Republican Sen. Richard G. Lugar, ranking member of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, the State Department explained that the practice of funding such projects became acceptable in 2003 when the Justice Department declared that the U.S. Constitution’s Establishment Clause did not preclude federal funds from going to preserve religious structures if they had cultural importance.

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2010/08/24/u...ehabilitation-around-the-world/#ixzz0yQcklW28
Click to expand...

Damn it!!!
 
Why is our leadership part of the jihad?

Islam is a favored religion amongst totalitarians because it's a totalitarian religion. So the internationalist fascist oppressors can now use our tolerance against us.

Fuck Islam
Fuck our leaders
Fuck the new world order

And all you legalistic deluded libertarian types should just turn your guns on yourselves for being the worst sellouts of them all.
 
AssHatZombie said:
Why is our leadership part of the jihad?

Islam is a favored religion amongst totalitarians because it's a totalitarian religion. So the internationalist fascist oppressors can now use our tolerance against us.

Fuck Islam
Fuck our leaders
Fuck the new world order

And all you legalistic deluded libertarian types should just turn your guns on yourselves for being the worst sellouts of them all.
Click to expand...

You know AssMat, you never give any direction. Always complaining with no options.

Who do you recommend we vote for?
 
Liberty said:
This should be a crime.

How long has this been going on?

Does the ACLU get gov't funding?
Click to expand...
Yes, they do. Actually when they bring suit, if they win, they are paid by the government entirely if they lose it is usually only partially. They eat some of it in a loss. But they gots donors...

Anyway, it amounts to about 3% of their total income. About 50% comes from donations, about 20% from membership dues, the rest basically comes from investment returns.
 
Damocles said:
Yes, they do. Actually when they bring suit, if they win, they are paid by the government entirely if they lose it is usually only partially. They eat some of it in a loss. But they gots donors...

Anyway, it amounts to about 3% of their total income. About 50% comes from donations, about 20% from membership dues, the rest basically comes from investment returns.
Click to expand...

WOW! This explains a lot.
 
Liberty said:
You know AssMat, you never give any direction. Always complaining with no options.

Who do you recommend we vote for?
Click to expand...

Don't vote at all.

This "lesser of two evils" logic only allows the traitors in politics to assert popular support for their treachery.
 
Yurt said:
given this became acceptable under the bush admin...how is it that obama's admin is abusing this?


In a document provided on Monday to Indiana Republican Sen. Richard G. Lugar, ranking member of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, the State Department explained that the practice of funding such projects became acceptable in 2003 when the Justice Department declared that the U.S. Constitution’s Establishment Clause did not preclude federal funds from going to preserve religious structures if they had cultural importance.

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2010/08/24/u...ehabilitation-around-the-world/#ixzz0yQcklW28
Click to expand...

So? It was wrong then and is wrong now. And you know Hillary's spent more.
 
Damocles said:
Yes, they do. Actually when they bring suit, if they win, they are paid by the government entirely if they lose it is usually only partially. They eat some of it in a loss. But they gots donors...

Anyway, it amounts to about 3% of their total income. About 50% comes from donations, about 20% from membership dues, the rest basically comes from investment returns.
Click to expand...


It's hardly accurate to say that the ACLU gets government donations based on court-awarded attorney's fees in successful suits against the government for civil rights violations.
 
Damn Yankee said:
Federal funding goes to the fucking ACLU. Who cares what its called?
Click to expand...


So anytime any person or entity is receives a court-ordered award of damages from the government we can say that the person or entity received "federal funding." That's fucking stupid.
 
NigelTufnel said:
So anytime any person or entity is receives a court-ordered award of damages from the government we can say that the person or entity received "federal funding." That's fucking stupid.
Click to expand...
I just calls it likes I sees it. Money goes from the Fed's general fund into theirs. From a group that claims to look out for the rights of all citizens it seems a bit hypocritical.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top