How is your bailout money being used? No one knows.

KingCondanomation

New member
What was the point of this again? Hopefully the few remaining supporters of this ever stupider looking bailout can start to realize that when government uses money, there is far less accountability than when you use it yourself.

"WASHINGTON (AP) - It's something any bank would demand to know before handing out a loan: Where's the money going?

But after receiving billions in aid from U.S. taxpayers, the nation's largest banks say they can't track exactly how they're spending the money or they simply refuse to discuss it.

"We've lent some of it. We've not lent some of it. We've not given any accounting of, 'Here's how we're doing it,'" said Thomas Kelly, a spokesman for JPMorgan Chase, which received $25 billion in emergency bailout money. "We have not disclosed that to the public. We're declining to."

The Associated Press contacted 21 banks that received at least $1 billion in government money and asked four questions: How much has been spent? What was it spent on? How much is being held in savings, and what's the plan for the rest?

None of the banks provided specific answers.

"We're not providing dollar-in, dollar-out tracking," said Barry Koling, a spokesman for Atlanta, Ga.-based SunTrust Banks Inc., which got $3.5 billion in taxpayer dollars.

Some banks said they simply didn't know where the money was going.

"We manage our capital in its aggregate," said Regions Financial Corp. (RF) spokesman Tim Deighton, who said the Birmingham, Ala.-based company is not tracking how it is spending the $3.5 billion it received as part of the financial bailout.

The answers highlight the secrecy surrounding the Troubled Asset Relief Program, which earmarked $700 billion - about the size of the Netherlands' economy - to help rescue the financial industry. The Treasury Department has been using the money to buy stock in U.S. banks, hoping that the sudden inflow of cash will get banks to start lending money.

There has been no accounting of how banks spend that money. Lawmakers summoned bank executives to Capitol Hill last month and implored them to lend the money - not to hoard it or spend it on corporate bonuses, junkets or to buy other banks. But there is no process in place to make sure that's happening and there are no consequences for banks who don't comply."
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20081222/D957QL7O0.html
 
anyone here NOT know this was going to happen?

don't look at me I was against the whole bailout concept for corporations.
I believe they live or die by their decisions. that is the execs get the big bucks and why the investors made big money with low taxes.
 
don't look at me I was against the whole bailout concept for corporations.
I believe they live or die by their decisions. that is the execs get the big bucks and why the investors made big money with low taxes.

that was a rhetorical question for waterfart, since he thinks that the bailout was the only way to save the economy.
 
I voted NO on directive 10-289 because this was an easily seen effect.
 
Bah! Who cares? It is only goverment money anyway. If they didn't waste it on the bailout, they'd waste it on a bridge to no where. Hell, if they didn't bailout the financial industry with that money, they'd probably just vote themselves bigger raises anyway.

Why should we care where they spend OUR frigging money!!!! :eek:

Immie
 
Back
Top