I suck

Flanders

Verified User
The conspicuous manner that every organized religion’s true believers have in common is that not a one of them ever practices “Do not bother me and I will not bother you.” Or to use the better-known phrase “Live and Let Live.” Their reason is obvious. Parasites cannot live on tax dollars and also practice live and let live.

I cannot count the number of Bible-thumpers that found my threads in 18 years. Live and let live is the only thing I ever wanted from Bible-thumpers, yet their talking points never included “let live.”

Hanging onto the Second Amendment is the best chance Americans have of holding tyranny at bay. When all of the legal and philosophical arguments have been made CONSTITUTIONALLY-PROTECTED UNREGISTERED GUNS is the muscle that enforces live and let live.

You might ask yourself why Americans are being asked to die fighting tyranny in foreign lands while marching quietly down the road to tyranny in their own country? If you are squeamish about the implications think of unregistered guns as a deterrent busybodies cannot accept.

There is a deeper question that should be asked: Why are Democrats doing it? The simple answer is because they cannot mind their own goddamned business. Eric Hoffer’s great observation applies to Socialists much more than it applies to the followers of Supreme Deity religions:



“To know a person's religion we need not listen to his profession of faith but must find his brand of intolerance.”

Organized religions were never a threat to individual liberties in America. Before Socialists began their campaign to install their own religion as the state’s religion no one was forced to join a church, or support a religion not of their own choosing. Freedom of religion —— as it was practiced in America before Socialists infiltrated the highest levels of government —— basically said live and let live. Meddlers abhor the very concept of letting others live their lives as they see fit. Live and let live is their intolerance.

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...2s-Brand-Of-Intolerance&p=2782041#post2782041

Frankly, I do not give a rat’s ass how homosexuals satisfy their desires as long as they do not use the power of government to force me to embrace them:

First we abhor; then we tolerate; then we embrace; then we legislate.

NOTE: I doubt if homosexuality would be accepted so quickly in the law if straight adults had a complete understanding of the physically disgusting acts so-called gays engage in.

Several states already legislated homosexual sexual lifestyles. Now another piece of media-created garbage is promising to move his lifestyle to the federal level.

To no one’s surprise a homosexual candidate starts by attacking the Right to bear arms. Pete Buttigieg found a gimmick the other Democrat wannabes missed when he claimed the Constitution allows gun controls. Buttigieg, like the others, have not the faintest idea:


images



Democrat presidential hopeful Pete Buttigieg used a question and answer session during an Iowa speech to claim numerous gun controls he supports are “completely compatible with the Second Amendment.”

C-Span published the question and answer session, wherein an audience member stood and read aloud a question centered on school shootings. The questioner identified himself as a millennial, “a hunter,” and “a responsible gun owner.” He asked what “policies and measures [Buttigieg] would take to ensure responsible gun laws.” Buttigieg replied:


Pete Buttigieg: Gun Control ‘Compatible with the Second Amendment’
by AWR HAWKINS
21 Apr 2019

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...control-compatible-with-the-second-amendment/

In more than two centuries countless freedom-loving Americans understood the reason for the Second Amendment, yet dirty little parasite scum think they are so much smarter they can convince Americans it is all about criminals. For all the filth Democrats like Buttigieg spew T.J. explains it in a few words:




jefferson-bear-arms_2.jpg


Finally, “Live and let live” is for Democrats but not for anyone else. Homosexuality is only one more commandment in Saul Alinsky’s rules governing behavior. Every command must dictate behavior. In short: Americans must be forced to do something rather than prohibit something. That is not do any of the things Socialism/Communism advocates —— kill, steal, lie, rape, suck on a prick, and so on.
 
"suck on a prick"

I think that's protected by the US Constitution.
In the Bible, not so much.
 
The conspicuous manner that every organized religion’s true believers have in common is that not a one of them ever practices “Do not bother me and I will not bother you.” Or to use the better-known phrase “Live and Let Live.” Their reason is obvious. Parasites cannot live on tax dollars and also practice live and let live.

I cannot count the number of Bible-thumpers that found my threads in 18 years. Live and let live is the only thing I ever wanted from Bible-thumpers, yet their talking points never included “let live.”

Hanging onto the Second Amendment is the best chance Americans have of holding tyranny at bay. When all of the legal and philosophical arguments have been made CONSTITUTIONALLY-PROTECTED UNREGISTERED GUNS is the muscle that enforces live and let live.

You might ask yourself why Americans are being asked to die fighting tyranny in foreign lands while marching quietly down the road to tyranny in their own country? If you are squeamish about the implications think of unregistered guns as a deterrent busybodies cannot accept.

There is a deeper question that should be asked: Why are Democrats doing it? The simple answer is because they cannot mind their own goddamned business. Eric Hoffer’s great observation applies to Socialists much more than it applies to the followers of Supreme Deity religions:



“To know a person's religion we need not listen to his profession of faith but must find his brand of intolerance.”

Organized religions were never a threat to individual liberties in America. Before Socialists began their campaign to install their own religion as the state’s religion no one was forced to join a church, or support a religion not of their own choosing. Freedom of religion —— as it was practiced in America before Socialists infiltrated the highest levels of government —— basically said live and let live. Meddlers abhor the very concept of letting others live their lives as they see fit. Live and let live is their intolerance.

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...2s-Brand-Of-Intolerance&p=2782041#post2782041

Frankly, I do not give a rat’s ass how homosexuals satisfy their desires as long as they do not use the power of government to force me to embrace them:

First we abhor; then we tolerate; then we embrace; then we legislate.

NOTE: I doubt if homosexuality would be accepted so quickly in the law if straight adults had a complete understanding of the physically disgusting acts so-called gays engage in.

Several states already legislated homosexual sexual lifestyles. Now another piece of media-created garbage is promising to move his lifestyle to the federal level.

To no one’s surprise a homosexual candidate starts by attacking the Right to bear arms. Pete Buttigieg found a gimmick the other Democrat wannabes missed when he claimed the Constitution allows gun controls. Buttigieg, like the others, have not the faintest idea:


images



Democrat presidential hopeful Pete Buttigieg used a question and answer session during an Iowa speech to claim numerous gun controls he supports are “completely compatible with the Second Amendment.”

C-Span published the question and answer session, wherein an audience member stood and read aloud a question centered on school shootings. The questioner identified himself as a millennial, “a hunter,” and “a responsible gun owner.” He asked what “policies and measures [Buttigieg] would take to ensure responsible gun laws.” Buttigieg replied:


Pete Buttigieg: Gun Control ‘Compatible with the Second Amendment’
by AWR HAWKINS
21 Apr 2019

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...control-compatible-with-the-second-amendment/

In more than two centuries countless freedom-loving Americans understood the reason for the Second Amendment, yet dirty little parasite scum think they are so much smarter they can convince Americans it is all about criminals. For all the filth Democrats like Buttigieg spew T.J. explains it in a few words:




jefferson-bear-arms_2.jpg


Finally, “Live and let live” is for Democrats but not for anyone else. Homosexuality is only one more commandment in Saul Alinsky’s rules governing behavior. Every command must dictate behavior. In short: Americans must be forced to do something rather than prohibit something. That is not do any of the things Socialism/Communism advocates —— kill, steal, lie, rape, suck on a prick, and so on.

Pretty long post ,just to say you jack off looking at your guns,to make you feel like a man.
 
The conspicuous manner that every organized religion’s true believers have in common is that not a one of them ever practices “Do not bother me and I will not bother you.” Or to use the better-known phrase “Live and Let Live.” Their reason is obvious. Parasites cannot live on tax dollars and also practice live and let live.

I cannot count the number of Bible-thumpers that found my threads in 18 years. Live and let live is the only thing I ever wanted from Bible-thumpers, yet their talking points never included “let live.”

Hanging onto the Second Amendment is the best chance Americans have of holding tyranny at bay. When all of the legal and philosophical arguments have been made CONSTITUTIONALLY-PROTECTED UNREGISTERED GUNS is the muscle that enforces live and let live.

You might ask yourself why Americans are being asked to die fighting tyranny in foreign lands while marching quietly down the road to tyranny in their own country? If you are squeamish about the implications think of unregistered guns as a deterrent busybodies cannot accept.

There is a deeper question that should be asked: Why are Democrats doing it? The simple answer is because they cannot mind their own goddamned business. Eric Hoffer’s great observation applies to Socialists much more than it applies to the followers of Supreme Deity religions:



“To know a person's religion we need not listen to his profession of faith but must find his brand of intolerance.”

Organized religions were never a threat to individual liberties in America. Before Socialists began their campaign to install their own religion as the state’s religion no one was forced to join a church, or support a religion not of their own choosing. Freedom of religion —— as it was practiced in America before Socialists infiltrated the highest levels of government —— basically said live and let live. Meddlers abhor the very concept of letting others live their lives as they see fit. Live and let live is their intolerance.

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...2s-Brand-Of-Intolerance&p=2782041#post2782041

Frankly, I do not give a rat’s ass how homosexuals satisfy their desires as long as they do not use the power of government to force me to embrace them:

First we abhor; then we tolerate; then we embrace; then we legislate.

NOTE: I doubt if homosexuality would be accepted so quickly in the law if straight adults had a complete understanding of the physically disgusting acts so-called gays engage in.

Several states already legislated homosexual sexual lifestyles. Now another piece of media-created garbage is promising to move his lifestyle to the federal level.

To no one’s surprise a homosexual candidate starts by attacking the Right to bear arms. Pete Buttigieg found a gimmick the other Democrat wannabes missed when he claimed the Constitution allows gun controls. Buttigieg, like the others, have not the faintest idea:


images



Democrat presidential hopeful Pete Buttigieg used a question and answer session during an Iowa speech to claim numerous gun controls he supports are “completely compatible with the Second Amendment.”

C-Span published the question and answer session, wherein an audience member stood and read aloud a question centered on school shootings. The questioner identified himself as a millennial, “a hunter,” and “a responsible gun owner.” He asked what “policies and measures [Buttigieg] would take to ensure responsible gun laws.” Buttigieg replied:


Pete Buttigieg: Gun Control ‘Compatible with the Second Amendment’
by AWR HAWKINS
21 Apr 2019

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...control-compatible-with-the-second-amendment/

In more than two centuries countless freedom-loving Americans understood the reason for the Second Amendment, yet dirty little parasite scum think they are so much smarter they can convince Americans it is all about criminals. For all the filth Democrats like Buttigieg spew T.J. explains it in a few words:




jefferson-bear-arms_2.jpg


Finally, “Live and let live” is for Democrats but not for anyone else. Homosexuality is only one more commandment in Saul Alinsky’s rules governing behavior. Every command must dictate behavior. In short: Americans must be forced to do something rather than prohibit something. That is not do any of the things Socialism/Communism advocates —— kill, steal, lie, rape, suck on a prick, and so on.

No one is using the gov't to force you to embrace homosexuals, you simpering, mincing old queen.

You do that all by yourself.
 
No one is using the gov't to force you to embrace homosexuals,

To CharacterAssassin: Asshole. Are you just stupid? or did you deliberately ignore this in a tread you read?

Remember that equal Rights, civil Rights, non-discrimination, quotas, affirmative action, and all of the other touchy-feely liberal causes can be summed up in one sentence: “You must associate with me.” It happened in the workplace, the schools, the military, in private clubs, and everywhere else; so there is every reason to believe that dignity and respect will evolve into forced associations. Never mind that everyone else’s dignity and respect is brushed aside. I offer this scenario to make my point:

I invite a dozen or so neighbors to a cookout. I specifically do not invite a homosexual couple who live down the street. They sue me for discrimination. I lose the case and money. The court orders me to associate with all of my neighbors. That is called protecting the individual while teaching me that I am part of the collective in all things.

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...acts-Supersede-Marriage&p=2822668#post2822668
 
To CharacterAssassin: Asshole. Are you just stupid? or did you deliberately ignore this in a tread you read?

Remember that equal Rights, civil Rights, non-discrimination, quotas, affirmative action, and all of the other touchy-feely liberal causes can be summed up in one sentence: “You must associate with me.” It happened in the workplace, the schools, the military, in private clubs, and everywhere else; so there is every reason to believe that dignity and respect will evolve into forced associations. Never mind that everyone else’s dignity and respect is brushed aside. I offer this scenario to make my point:

I invite a dozen or so neighbors to a cookout. I specifically do not invite a homosexual couple who live down the street. They sue me for discrimination. I lose the case and money. The court orders me to associate with all of my neighbors. That is called protecting the individual while teaching me that I am part of the collective in all things.

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...acts-Supersede-Marriage&p=2822668#post2822668

They have no grounds to sue you on. No one is using the gov't to force you to embrace homosexuals.

Why do you only have sex w/strange men you don't know?
 
They have no grounds to sue you on.

To CharacterAssassin: Let it go before you look even dumber. Not getting an invitation is the only thing they need to file a discrimination suit.

A winning lawsuit would be a lock in today’s courts if they showed up uninvited and I politely told them they are not welcomed on my property.

The theory of the Communists may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property. Karl Marx (1818 – 1883) and Friedrich Engels (1820 – 1895)
 
To CharacterAssassin: Let it go before you look even dumber. Not getting an invitation is the only thing they need to file a discrimination suit.

A winning lawsuit would be a lock in today’s courts if they showed up uninvited and I politely told them they are not welcomed on my property.

The theory of the Communists may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property. Karl Marx (1818 – 1883) and Friedrich Engels (1820 – 1895)

No, they can't file a suit based on that.

Why do you only have gay sex and gay sex with communistic men who you don't even know?
 
The conspicuous manner that every organized religion’s true believers have in common is that not a one of them ever practices “Do not bother me and I will not bother you.” Or to use the better-known phrase “Live and Let Live.” Their reason is obvious. Parasites cannot live on tax dollars and also practice live and let live.

I cannot count the number of Bible-thumpers that found my threads in 18 years. Live and let live is the only thing I ever wanted from Bible-thumpers, yet their talking points never included “let live.”

Hanging onto the Second Amendment is the best chance Americans have of holding tyranny at bay. When all of the legal and philosophical arguments have been made CONSTITUTIONALLY-PROTECTED UNREGISTERED GUNS is the muscle that enforces live and let live.

You might ask yourself why Americans are being asked to die fighting tyranny in foreign lands while marching quietly down the road to tyranny in their own country? If you are squeamish about the implications think of unregistered guns as a deterrent busybodies cannot accept.

There is a deeper question that should be asked: Why are Democrats doing it? The simple answer is because they cannot mind their own goddamned business. Eric Hoffer’s great observation applies to Socialists much more than it applies to the followers of Supreme Deity religions:



“To know a person's religion we need not listen to his profession of faith but must find his brand of intolerance.”

Organized religions were never a threat to individual liberties in America. Before Socialists began their campaign to install their own religion as the state’s religion no one was forced to join a church, or support a religion not of their own choosing. Freedom of religion —— as it was practiced in America before Socialists infiltrated the highest levels of government —— basically said live and let live. Meddlers abhor the very concept of letting others live their lives as they see fit. Live and let live is their intolerance.

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...2s-Brand-Of-Intolerance&p=2782041#post2782041

Frankly, I do not give a rat’s ass how homosexuals satisfy their desires as long as they do not use the power of government to force me to embrace them:

First we abhor; then we tolerate; then we embrace; then we legislate.

NOTE: I doubt if homosexuality would be accepted so quickly in the law if straight adults had a complete understanding of the physically disgusting acts so-called gays engage in.

Several states already legislated homosexual sexual lifestyles. Now another piece of media-created garbage is promising to move his lifestyle to the federal level.

To no one’s surprise a homosexual candidate starts by attacking the Right to bear arms. Pete Buttigieg found a gimmick the other Democrat wannabes missed when he claimed the Constitution allows gun controls. Buttigieg, like the others, have not the faintest idea:


images



Democrat presidential hopeful Pete Buttigieg used a question and answer session during an Iowa speech to claim numerous gun controls he supports are “completely compatible with the Second Amendment.”

C-Span published the question and answer session, wherein an audience member stood and read aloud a question centered on school shootings. The questioner identified himself as a millennial, “a hunter,” and “a responsible gun owner.” He asked what “policies and measures [Buttigieg] would take to ensure responsible gun laws.” Buttigieg replied:


Pete Buttigieg: Gun Control ‘Compatible with the Second Amendment’
by AWR HAWKINS
21 Apr 2019

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...control-compatible-with-the-second-amendment/

In more than two centuries countless freedom-loving Americans understood the reason for the Second Amendment, yet dirty little parasite scum think they are so much smarter they can convince Americans it is all about criminals. For all the filth Democrats like Buttigieg spew T.J. explains it in a few words:




jefferson-bear-arms_2.jpg


Finally, “Live and let live” is for Democrats but not for anyone else. Homosexuality is only one more commandment in Saul Alinsky’s rules governing behavior. Every command must dictate behavior. In short: Americans must be forced to do something rather than prohibit something. That is not do any of the things Socialism/Communism advocates —— kill, steal, lie, rape, suck on a prick, and so on.

Sounds like you are expecting "live and let live" but refusing to apply it yourself.
 
these idiots who claim gay is a choice are insane

There is NOTHING on the face of this earth you could do to me to make me want pussy



It is not a fucking choice


It is brain wiring


you idiots made a choice


you must have or would not be claiming its a choice



You are bi and decided to pretend you were Hetro



that is not a choice its a lie you dumb fucks


so because you idiots decided to lie for life about who you are everyone is supposed to hate gay people?


fuck dat



live with who you are and quit projecting your inability to accept who you really are as a restriction you wish to punish the rest of us with



get a god dammed grip and face who you are




gay people don't choose


hetro people dont choose


bi people don't choose



but you need to lie about who you are inside so you try to force us to accept the lie that people choose all so you can live with your self and your fucked up world view


NO we don't accept


fuck off
 
Why do you only have sex w/strange men you don't know?

Why do you only have gay sex and gay sex with communistic men who you don't even know?

To CharacterAssassin: No more psychoanalysis please. I heard all of the psycho-babble homosexuals assigned to my commentaries more times than I can remember. Get yourself some new dialogue. Homosexual psycho-babble labeling everyone else homosexual was worn out fifty years ago. If you need a shot in the drawers to relieve yourself, do not lay the same desires on me.

Incidentally, Democrats play the moral card whenever they have nothing to say. Everything Democrats object to is morally wrong. Psycho-babble is a variation of the same game. Homosexual psycho-babble is probably the worst because they need every edge they can get to quiet their self-loathing.


Sounds like you are expecting "live and let live" but refusing to apply it yourself.

To Heff: Put some work in on your reading comprehension skills:

Frankly, I do not give a rat’s ass how homosexuals satisfy their desires as long as they do not use the power of government to force me to embrace them:
 
To CharacterAssassin: No more psychoanalysis please. I heard all of the psycho-babble homosexuals assigned to my commentaries more times than I can remember. Get yourself some new dialogue. Homosexual psycho-babble labeling everyone else homosexual was worn out fifty years ago. If you need a shot in the drawers to relieve yourself, do not lay the same desires on me.

Incidentally, Democrats play the moral card whenever they have nothing to say. Everything Democrats object to is morally wrong. Psycho-babble is a variation of the same game. Homosexual psycho-babble is probably the worst because they need every edge they can get to quiet their self-loathing.




To Heff: Put some work in on your reading comprehension skills:

Why do you only have gay sex and gay sex with communistic men who you don't even know?
 
these idiots who claim gay is a choice are insane

There is NOTHING on the face of this earth you could do to me to make me want pussy



It is not a fucking choice


It is brain wiring


you idiots made a choice


you must have or would not be claiming its a choice



You are bi and decided to pretend you were Hetro



that is not a choice its a lie you dumb fucks


so because you idiots decided to lie for life about who you are everyone is supposed to hate gay people?


fuck dat



live with who you are and quit projecting your inability to accept who you really are as a restriction you wish to punish the rest of us with



get a god dammed grip and face who you are




gay people don't choose


hetro people dont choose


bi people don't choose



but you need to lie about who you are inside so you try to force us to accept the lie that people choose all so you can live with your self and your fucked up world view


NO we don't accept


fuck off

Really?You never really know a gal till you've tasted her.
 
Back
Top