"“Hillary will end up with more automatic delegates than Obama,” Ickes said, and the number of elections won by Obama is “irrelevant to the obligations of automatic delegates.”
http://youdecide08.foxnews.com/2008...-decide-election-obamas-victories-irrelevant/
I love the use of "automatic" now to describe them. First, one of Hillary's aides called the 22 states Obama won "insignificant states," and now Ickes is calling them "irrelevant."
You want cynical, vote Hillary. If this ends up happening, where Obama wins the pledged delegates & a bunch of Clinton cronies make the final call, I doubt I'll ever vote for a Democrat again. I certainly won't vote for Hillary, under any circumstances. Bush could run again & I still wouldn't vote for her.
http://youdecide08.foxnews.com/2008...-decide-election-obamas-victories-irrelevant/
I love the use of "automatic" now to describe them. First, one of Hillary's aides called the 22 states Obama won "insignificant states," and now Ickes is calling them "irrelevant."
You want cynical, vote Hillary. If this ends up happening, where Obama wins the pledged delegates & a bunch of Clinton cronies make the final call, I doubt I'll ever vote for a Democrat again. I certainly won't vote for Hillary, under any circumstances. Bush could run again & I still wouldn't vote for her.