In Harlems 94th district Obama did not get one vote

That's not funny at all, that's criminal. Black people are voting for Obama at 80 to 90%. He won those districts. But their votes are not counted. Heads should roll. Our Democracy is in jeopardy.
 
What a fraud ya are...............

ViolaLee said:
That's not funny at all, that's criminal. Black people are voting for Obama at 80 to 90%. He won those districts. But their votes are not counted. Heads should roll. Our Democracy is in jeopardy.
Click to expand...



Like 'Mo town' of yesterday is equivalent to Gangsta rap now? Quit...with all the false outrage already...your true colors are showing...Ms.Lib 'Code Pinko' Race card deva! I laugh in your silly face!
 
Battleborne said:
Like 'Mo town' of yesterday is equivalent to Gangsta rap now? Quit...with all the false outrage already...your true colors are showing...Ms.Lib 'Code Pinko' Race card deva! I laugh in your silly face!
Click to expand...

Put down the bottle BB.

Where did MoTown and Gangster rap come into the conversation?
 
Race card...............

Watermark said:
Put down the bottle BB.

Where did MoTown and Gangster rap come into the conversation?
Click to expand...


BS!...and where did you grow up not to see this BS? Violalee made the innuendo not I!


and by the way quit with the bottle and drunk canned liberal response to everything the opposition says...it's really getting old...waterbaby!;)
 
Last edited:
Initial results in the 94th District, for example, showed a 141-0 sweep for the New York senator, but Board of Elections spokeswoman Valerie Vazquez said today that the ongoing recount had changed the tally to 261-136.

As yet, none of the results has been certified, Vazquez said, adding that the Board of Elections had begun a painstaking ballot-by-ballot canvassing of all voting machines four days after the Feb. 5 election.

"We are doing a recanvass, and we will be counting all paper ballots, including absentee ones," Vazquez said.

"Some initial tallies had zeros, but it was most likely due to human error. Those were unofficial numbers, and no confirmed results have been released yet."

In a predominantly black Brooklyn district for which Clinton was given credit for a 118-0 victory on Primary Night, the Board of Elections' latest figures indicate that she may not even come out the winner - Obama currently has 116 votes to her 118.
Click to expand...

OBAMA ROBBED IN NY - New York Post
 
Desh said:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/16/nyregion/16vote.html?_r=3&hp&oref=slogin&oref=slogin&oref=slogin


Strike anyone as a little funny?

Its not the only one in the area.
Click to expand...

What strikes me funny is you not even reading, or just maybe failing to understand your own freekin' link....



In the Harlem district, for instance, where the primary night returns suggested a 141 to 0 sweep by Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, the vote now stands at 261 to 136. In an even more heavily black district in Brooklyn — where the vote on primary night was recorded as 118 to 0 for Mrs. Clinton — she now barely leads, 118 to 116.

The history of New York elections has been punctuated by episodes of confusion, incompetence and even occasional corruption. And election officials and lawyers for both Mr. Obama and Mrs. Clinton agree that it is not uncommon for mistakes to be made by weary inspectors rushing on election night to transcribe columns of numbers that are delivered first to the police and then to the news media.
 
bravo said:
What strikes me funny is you not even reading, or just maybe failing to understand your own freekin' link....



In the Harlem district, for instance, where the primary night returns suggested a 141 to 0 sweep by Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, the vote now stands at 261 to 136. In an even more heavily black district in Brooklyn — where the vote on primary night was recorded as 118 to 0 for Mrs. Clinton — she now barely leads, 118 to 116.

The history of New York elections has been punctuated by episodes of confusion, incompetence and even occasional corruption. And election officials and lawyers for both Mr. Obama and Mrs. Clinton agree that it is not uncommon for mistakes to be made by weary inspectors rushing on election night to transcribe columns of numbers that are delivered first to the police and then to the news media.
Click to expand...
Are you suggesting that Democrats might even be corrupt sometimes? NO! It can't be. Let's see if we can make this Bush's fault now, think hard....

Machines! If they use Machines it is all Bush's fault!
 
you honestly have to be pretty stupid to be this close to politics and not see all the criminal acts going on within the Clinton campaign. wake up people.. clinton is the next nixon.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top