Peace n Safety
Banned
Isaiah 7:2
King Ahaz who is said to have done evil in the sight of the Lord is filled with fear. Isaiah is sent to prophesy to the king and he is to bring Shaaryashuv with him.
Three kings are planning to replace Ahaz with a non member from the House of David. However, the threat to the House of David will not go unnoticed by God because of the Davidic Covenant of II Samuel 7:11-17, I Chronicles 17:10-15, and Psalm 89.
The reason ahaz trembled as he did is he has failed to believe in the David covenant.
Take heed (forget Assyria), be quiet (exhorts faith towards the God of Abraham Isaac and Jacob), do not fear, do not be faint hearted.
Attempt made to insert Tabeel (Ezra 4:7) over the House of David. God may have allowed the overthrow if it meant setting up a member of the Davidic lineage.
A look from Isaiah’s time frame 735 BC to the fulfillment of the prophecy 65 years II Kings 17:22-24, Ezra 4:2 when Assarhaddon took complete control and full scale captivity.
Behold in Hebrew is a demonstrative article meaning something or some person referring to past present or future. Used 43 times by Isaiah always of the future except in 48:7. Hence the birth is future and the conception too, is future. The virgin (Ha Almah) What woman was mentioned thus far since chapter one? Which almah? There is none therefore we must go to the larger context where ha almah (the virgin) is found that would be generally understood by the Jewish minds with messianic connotations? Gen 3:15. The seed of the woman.
Hebrew words for virgin differentiated Rabbinical objection answered.
(1) Ne urah a damsel I Kings 1:2 a virgin of young age, and a non virgin in Ruth 2:6, a widow.
(2) Betulah according to rabbinic theology claims if Isaiah wanted to mean a virgin he would have used this word rather than ha almah.
In most cases betulah refers to a virgin. But not always. Genesis 24:60 betulah is used but additionally the explanatory phrase “neither had any man known her.”
And Judges 1:12 400 young betulahs again the writer gives this explanatory phrase to show what they mean by betulah “That had not known men by lying with them.” And finally Joel 1:8 betulah is used as a widow.
(3) Almah a young woman of marriageable age used 7 times in scripture and is never used of a married woman. Betulah can be a virgin woman of any age but almah only a young virgin woman and never a married woman. Genesis 24:43 Rebekah a virgin. Exodus 2:8 Miriam a virgin. Psalms 68:25 virgins. Song of Solomon twice 1:3, 6:8 he categorized three kinds of women, queens, concubines, and prospective wives almah. Proverbs 30:18 contrasts with the adulterous of chapter of 30:20.
In all the passages almah are single women and always refer to young
*This context demands the supernatural.
Keeping in mind that it is God who is providing the sign, therefore two options. A virgin birth or a illegitimate child. An illegitimate child would create a moral problem since God is the one doing this and an illegitimate child hardly could be used to get Ahaz or the House of David to believe. And finally the Name given, Emmanuel. When parents name a child it shows the thinking of the parents. But when God names the child it shows the actual nature of the child God with us.
Summary conclusions the sign is given to Ahaz And the whole House of David. The Hebrew word is never used a married woman. And the context requires the supernatural being used to create faith in Ahaz and to create faith in the House of David. And the flow of the context in Isaiah’s book demands a virgin birth because in chapter 7 Emmanuel is to be born in the future, in chapter 9 Emmanuel is viewed as already born and in chapter 11 Emmanuel is viewed as already ruling in the Messianic Kingdom.
Here’s the issue the rabbis came up with. If this is a future sign, what good is it to Ahaz? And that is a valid criticism. But notice in verses 15-17 Isaiah goes back to the singular (you - Ahaz).
*For the House of David (plural y’all) it will be the virgin birth, the House of David will not lose its identity until, the virgin birth (significant because the genealogical records were burnt in A.D. 70 requiring that Messiah come before that event because He had to prove His ancestry back to David).
Vs 15-17 back to Ahaz. Now Shaaryashuv Isaiah’s son. Here again Isaiah uses the definite article forcing his readers to look for the nearest mention of a son in the immediate context. Was there another son mentioned earlier? Yes in chapter 3 God told Isaiah to bring his son with him.
The point of Shaaryashuv is this, before he is old enough to make moral choices, the two kings threatening you will be off Ahaz’ back. II Kings 29-0 Pekah, Rezin II Kings 16:9. Now vs 17 Assyria. If Ahaz wants Assyria you will get Assyria. Not only will Assyria take Israel, but Judah will become servitude to Assyria for the next several decades.
Blessings
King Ahaz who is said to have done evil in the sight of the Lord is filled with fear. Isaiah is sent to prophesy to the king and he is to bring Shaaryashuv with him.
Three kings are planning to replace Ahaz with a non member from the House of David. However, the threat to the House of David will not go unnoticed by God because of the Davidic Covenant of II Samuel 7:11-17, I Chronicles 17:10-15, and Psalm 89.
The reason ahaz trembled as he did is he has failed to believe in the David covenant.
Take heed (forget Assyria), be quiet (exhorts faith towards the God of Abraham Isaac and Jacob), do not fear, do not be faint hearted.
Attempt made to insert Tabeel (Ezra 4:7) over the House of David. God may have allowed the overthrow if it meant setting up a member of the Davidic lineage.
A look from Isaiah’s time frame 735 BC to the fulfillment of the prophecy 65 years II Kings 17:22-24, Ezra 4:2 when Assarhaddon took complete control and full scale captivity.
Behold in Hebrew is a demonstrative article meaning something or some person referring to past present or future. Used 43 times by Isaiah always of the future except in 48:7. Hence the birth is future and the conception too, is future. The virgin (Ha Almah) What woman was mentioned thus far since chapter one? Which almah? There is none therefore we must go to the larger context where ha almah (the virgin) is found that would be generally understood by the Jewish minds with messianic connotations? Gen 3:15. The seed of the woman.
Hebrew words for virgin differentiated Rabbinical objection answered.
(1) Ne urah a damsel I Kings 1:2 a virgin of young age, and a non virgin in Ruth 2:6, a widow.
(2) Betulah according to rabbinic theology claims if Isaiah wanted to mean a virgin he would have used this word rather than ha almah.
In most cases betulah refers to a virgin. But not always. Genesis 24:60 betulah is used but additionally the explanatory phrase “neither had any man known her.”
And Judges 1:12 400 young betulahs again the writer gives this explanatory phrase to show what they mean by betulah “That had not known men by lying with them.” And finally Joel 1:8 betulah is used as a widow.
(3) Almah a young woman of marriageable age used 7 times in scripture and is never used of a married woman. Betulah can be a virgin woman of any age but almah only a young virgin woman and never a married woman. Genesis 24:43 Rebekah a virgin. Exodus 2:8 Miriam a virgin. Psalms 68:25 virgins. Song of Solomon twice 1:3, 6:8 he categorized three kinds of women, queens, concubines, and prospective wives almah. Proverbs 30:18 contrasts with the adulterous of chapter of 30:20.
In all the passages almah are single women and always refer to young
*This context demands the supernatural.
Keeping in mind that it is God who is providing the sign, therefore two options. A virgin birth or a illegitimate child. An illegitimate child would create a moral problem since God is the one doing this and an illegitimate child hardly could be used to get Ahaz or the House of David to believe. And finally the Name given, Emmanuel. When parents name a child it shows the thinking of the parents. But when God names the child it shows the actual nature of the child God with us.
Summary conclusions the sign is given to Ahaz And the whole House of David. The Hebrew word is never used a married woman. And the context requires the supernatural being used to create faith in Ahaz and to create faith in the House of David. And the flow of the context in Isaiah’s book demands a virgin birth because in chapter 7 Emmanuel is to be born in the future, in chapter 9 Emmanuel is viewed as already born and in chapter 11 Emmanuel is viewed as already ruling in the Messianic Kingdom.
Here’s the issue the rabbis came up with. If this is a future sign, what good is it to Ahaz? And that is a valid criticism. But notice in verses 15-17 Isaiah goes back to the singular (you - Ahaz).
*For the House of David (plural y’all) it will be the virgin birth, the House of David will not lose its identity until, the virgin birth (significant because the genealogical records were burnt in A.D. 70 requiring that Messiah come before that event because He had to prove His ancestry back to David).
Vs 15-17 back to Ahaz. Now Shaaryashuv Isaiah’s son. Here again Isaiah uses the definite article forcing his readers to look for the nearest mention of a son in the immediate context. Was there another son mentioned earlier? Yes in chapter 3 God told Isaiah to bring his son with him.
The point of Shaaryashuv is this, before he is old enough to make moral choices, the two kings threatening you will be off Ahaz’ back. II Kings 29-0 Pekah, Rezin II Kings 16:9. Now vs 17 Assyria. If Ahaz wants Assyria you will get Assyria. Not only will Assyria take Israel, but Judah will become servitude to Assyria for the next several decades.
Blessings