Just for Desh...

Think back on how those previous "conspiracy theorys" panned out SP?

WP in Fallugia
No WMDs
No AQ ties
Voting Machines untrustable
No Yellow cake

to name a few.
 
Desh said:
Think back on how those previous "conspiracy theorys" panned out SP?

WP in Fallugia
No WMDs
No AQ ties
Voting Machines untrustable
No Yellow cake

to name a few.
Click to expand...

All the more reason you should promote this one... all the conspiracy theories you believe in turn out to be true.
 
That is because I pick and choose which ones to talk about.


It seems my judgement is often pretty good huh?
 
The most hilarious argument by the left is that they were "right on Iraq" so we should just trust them with everything else.
 
Epicurus said:
The most hilarious argument by the left is that they were "right on Iraq" so we should just trust them with everything else.
Click to expand...

Myself, I find the argument that the right was wrong on Iraq so we should just trust them on everything else, funnier. But you know, that’s me.
 
Desh said:
That is because I pick and choose which ones to talk about.


It seems my judgement is often pretty good huh?
Click to expand...

1) Voting machines with paper trails are fine. Those without, I agree with you.

2) Yellow cake... that is disputed, British Intel still insists Saddam tried to acquire it. US Intel said no.

3) Al queda ties... only morons think (or thought) Saddam had anything to do with 9/11.

4) WMDs, yeah, it turned out there weren't any. Kudos.

5) WP... I assume this is in reference to Falluja... in which case you were correct on this as well.

Yes, you have gotten some of them correct. Blind squirrell and all that...:cool:
 
5) there was no reason to assume I said Fallugia.

I was attacked (sometimes by dems) as being a conspiracy theorist on all these issues.

I love being right.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top