Kamala Harris’ campaign team is editing news headlines in her favor — without outlets’ knowledge

ziggy

Verified User
Vice President Kamala Harris’ campaign team has been silently editing news headlines in Google search results to make it seem like major news outlets are on her side, according to a report.

The altered headlines — all paired with a “Paid for by Harris for President” banner — were changed without the news outlets’ knowledge, Axios reported Tuesday.

Nearly a dozen publishers were swept up in the faux headline campaign, including major companies like the Guardian, Reuters, CBS News, the Associated Press and PBS.

Even smaller publications like North Dakota’s WDay Radio also saw their headlines changed.


The ads include links to real articles from news outlets, but the headlines and descriptive text had been edited to cast a supportive light on the 59-year-old presidential hopeful.

For example, one ad that ran alongside an article from the Guardian shows a headline that reads “VP Harris Fights Abortion Bans – Harris Defends Repro Freedom” and includes supporting text underneath the headline that reads, “VP Harris is a champion for reproductive freedom and will stop Trump’s abortion bans.”

Another linking to an NPR story reads, “Harris Will Lower Health Costs,” with supporting text that says, “Kamala Harris will lower the cost of high-quality affordable health care,” Axios reported.

Spokespeople from the affected companies like CNN, USA Today and NPR — all of which have published flattering content about Harris in recent weeks — said they had no idea the companies were tied up in the campaign.

https://nypost.com/2024/08/13/us-ne...=nypost&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter#
“While we understand why an organization might wish to align itself with the Guardian’s trusted brand, we need to ensure it is being used appropriately and with our permission. We’ll be reaching out to Google for more information about this practice,” a Guardian spokesperson said.

Though misleading, the tactic does not violate Google’s policies because the fake ads are prominently labeled as “sponsored” and “easily distinguishable from search results.”

The shocking report comes as Harris is hiding from the very same press that she is desperately trying to skew in her favor.

The former California attorney general has refused to do significant interviews or news appearances since winning the presidential nomination more than three weeks ago.

The Harris campaign did not respond to The Post’s request for comment.

 
Vice President Kamala Harris’ campaign team has been silently editing news headlines in Google search results to make it seem like major news outlets are on her side, according to a report.

The altered headlines — all paired with a “Paid for by Harris for President” banner — were changed without the news outlets’ knowledge, Axios reported Tuesday.

Nearly a dozen publishers were swept up in the faux headline campaign, including major companies like the Guardian, Reuters, CBS News, the Associated Press and PBS.

Even smaller publications like North Dakota’s WDay Radio also saw their headlines changed.


The ads include links to real articles from news outlets, but the headlines and descriptive text had been edited to cast a supportive light on the 59-year-old presidential hopeful.

For example, one ad that ran alongside an article from the Guardian shows a headline that reads “VP Harris Fights Abortion Bans – Harris Defends Repro Freedom” and includes supporting text underneath the headline that reads, “VP Harris is a champion for reproductive freedom and will stop Trump’s abortion bans.”

Another linking to an NPR story reads, “Harris Will Lower Health Costs,” with supporting text that says, “Kamala Harris will lower the cost of high-quality affordable health care,” Axios reported.

Spokespeople from the affected companies like CNN, USA Today and NPR — all of which have published flattering content about Harris in recent weeks — said they had no idea the companies were tied up in the campaign.

https://nypost.com/2024/08/13/us-ne...=nypost&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter#
“While we understand why an organization might wish to align itself with the Guardian’s trusted brand, we need to ensure it is being used appropriately and with our permission. We’ll be reaching out to Google for more information about this practice,” a Guardian spokesperson said.

Though misleading, the tactic does not violate Google’s policies because the fake ads are prominently labeled as “sponsored” and “easily distinguishable from search results.”

The shocking report comes as Harris is hiding from the very same press that she is desperately trying to skew in her favor.

The former California attorney general has refused to do significant interviews or news appearances since winning the presidential nomination more than three weeks ago.

The Harris campaign did not respond to The Post’s request for comment.

So Faux Headlines for a Faux candidate.

And I'm not surprised that the campaign doesn't want to be accountable to the Post.
 
Vice President Kamala Harris’ campaign team has been silently editing news headlines in Google search results to make it seem like major news outlets are on her side, according to a report.

The altered headlines — all paired with a “Paid for by Harris for President” banner — were changed without the news outlets’ knowledge, Axios reported Tuesday.

Nearly a dozen publishers were swept up in the faux headline campaign, including major companies like the Guardian, Reuters, CBS News, the Associated Press and PBS.

Even smaller publications like North Dakota’s WDay Radio also saw their headlines changed.


The ads include links to real articles from news outlets, but the headlines and descriptive text had been edited to cast a supportive light on the 59-year-old presidential hopeful.

For example, one ad that ran alongside an article from the Guardian shows a headline that reads “VP Harris Fights Abortion Bans – Harris Defends Repro Freedom” and includes supporting text underneath the headline that reads, “VP Harris is a champion for reproductive freedom and will stop Trump’s abortion bans.”

Another linking to an NPR story reads, “Harris Will Lower Health Costs,” with supporting text that says, “Kamala Harris will lower the cost of high-quality affordable health care,” Axios reported.

Spokespeople from the affected companies like CNN, USA Today and NPR — all of which have published flattering content about Harris in recent weeks — said they had no idea the companies were tied up in the campaign.

https://nypost.com/2024/08/13/us-ne...=nypost&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter#
“While we understand why an organization might wish to align itself with the Guardian’s trusted brand, we need to ensure it is being used appropriately and with our permission. We’ll be reaching out to Google for more information about this practice,” a Guardian spokesperson said.

Though misleading, the tactic does not violate Google’s policies because the fake ads are prominently labeled as “sponsored” and “easily distinguishable from search results.”

The shocking report comes as Harris is hiding from the very same press that she is desperately trying to skew in her favor.

The former California attorney general has refused to do significant interviews or news appearances since winning the presidential nomination more than three weeks ago.

The Harris campaign did not respond to The Post’s request for comment.

Low IQ much
 

Harris campaign’s fake online headlines draw lawsuit threat, charges of peddling ‘lies’ to voters​

A radio station is contemplating a lawsuit against Vice President Kamala Harris’ campaign over its practice of altering headlines in online ads to make it appear that news outlets are supporting her bid for the White House.

Campaign ethics experts called the ad manipulation strategy “sloppy” and a threat to Ms. Harris’ claims of running an honest operation.

Steve Hallstrom, president and managing partner of Fieldstone Group, which operates WDAY Radio in Fargo, North Dakota, said the Harris campaign “lied to every single person who saw that ad.”

“We have reached out to the Harris campaign and demanded they terminate this ad immediately, and we are considering all options here, including legal action,” he said. “This is not right, and they should not be allowed to get away with this and tarnish our reputation — whether it’s a family-owned North Dakota company like us or a major national news organization.”

Peter Loge, who teaches ethics in political communication at George Washington University, said he was surprised that the Harris campaign would employ this tactic.

“They are running a pro-honesty, pro-democracy campaign, and this is a sloppy behavior that runs against the core of what they are trying to do,” Mr. Loge said.

The Harris campaign took headlines from news outlets, rewrote them to seem more favorable to her, and wrote favorable text descriptions. The campaign placed the rewritten content as Google ads while prominently displaying the names of Reuters, CNN, USA Today, The Associated Press and other media outlets.

The ads are linked to genuine news stories.

The Harris campaign did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

Ethics experts said the tactic is misinformation that could confuse voters and contribute to further mistrust and threats to democracy.

“The Harris campaign intended to mislead potential voters by changing news coverage to present their candidate more positively. This is an attempt to manipulate voters by essentially lying to them,” said Chrysalis Wright, director of the Media & Migration Lab at the University of Central Florida.

AllSides, a media watchdog that monitors political bias among news outlets, called for the ads to be taken down immediately and urged Google to block the ads.

“The Harris campaign is running Google ads that blur the line between campaign content and news reporting,” said John Gable, CEO of AllSides. “These ads are misleading, misrepresent the original news content, give the appearance of support for her candidacy and create the impression of bias on the part of the outlets, whose content is being promoted. These types of ads should be disallowed from Google.”

In the case of WDAY, the Harris campaign took two headlines about Ms. Harris’ selection of Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz to be her running mate, blended them, rewrote the headlines to be more favorable to the campaign and posted them on Google ads.

The stories, “Harris Picks Tim Walz” and “Minnesota child tax credit benefits 215,000 Minnesota Families,” were mashed together and reposted as an ad with different headlines, including “Harris Picks Tim Walz — 215,000 MN Families Win,” according to data from Google’s Ads Transparency Center.

A headline from The Guardian that read “VP Harris Fights Abortion Bans” was changed to add “Harris Defends Repro Freedom.” The Harris campaign then added text that read, “VP Harris is a champion for reproductive rights and will stop Trump’s abortion bans.”

An ad that links to an NPR story with the headline “Harris Will Lower Health Costs” now includes supporting text, “Kamala Harris will lower the cost of high-quality affordable health care.”

USA Today, The Guardian, The Associated Press, Reuters and the Independent issued statements saying they were angry and had no knowledge of or control over the way their content was presented.

The Independent said the series of fake headlines “is undermining what politics and journalism is all about.”

Former President Donald Trump questioned the practice.

“Wow! Google and the Harris Campaign are manipulating stories. Is this legal?” he said on social media.

The Trump campaign is not running those types of ads, Google’s Ad Transparency Center said.

 
Smut me, baby
giphy.gif
 
Remember that time when Fox News paid 787 million dollars for lying to their viewers? That was cool.
 
this is not that big of a surprise, seeing the leftists applaud this tactic. After all, they dont' mind being lied to when they've been led to believe that being lied to is for their own good.
 
this is not that big of a surprise, seeing the leftists applaud this tactic. After all, they dont' mind being lied to when they've been led to believe that being lied to is for their own good.
I guess you like be directly lied to. I get it. It’s more efficient.
 
Back
Top