Making a killing from hunger

uscitizen

Villified User
Making a killing from hunger

We need to overturn food policy, now!

GRAIN

For some time now the rising cost of food all over the world has taken households, governments and the media by storm. The price of wheat has gone up by 130% over the last year.[1] Rice has doubled in price in Asia in the first three months of 2008 alone,[2] and just last week it hit record highs on the Chicago futures market.[3] For most of 2007 the spiralling cost of cooking oil, fruit and vegetables, as well as of dairy and meat, led to a fall in the consumption of these items. From Haiti to Cameroon to Bangladesh, people have been taking to the streets in anger at being unable to afford the food they need. In fear of political turmoil, world leaders have been calling for more food aid, as well as for more funds and technology to boost agricultural production. Cereal exporting countries, meanwhile, are closing their borders to protect their domestic markets, while other countries have been forced into panic buying. Is this a price blip? No. A food shortage? Not that either. We are in a structural meltdown, the direct result of three decades of neoliberal globalisation.

Farmers across the world produced a record 2.3 billion tons of grain in 2007, up 4% on the previous year. Since 1961 the world’s cereal output has tripled, while the population has doubled. Stocks are at their lowest level in 30 years, it’s true,[4] but the bottom line is that there is enough food produced in the world to feed the population. The problem is that it doesn’t get to all of those who need it. Less than half of the world’s grain production is directly eaten by people. Most goes into animal feed and, increasingly, biofuels – massive inflexible industrial chains. In fact, once you look behind the cold curtain of statistics, you realise that something is fundamentally wrong with our food system. We have allowed food to be transformed from something that nourishes people and provides them with secure livelihoods into a commodity for speculation and bargaining. The perverse logic of this system has come to a head. Today it is staring us in the face that this system puts the profits of investors before the food needs of people.
~
The situation today is untenable. Look at Haiti. A few decades ago it was self-sufficient in rice. But conditions on foreign loans, particularly a 1994 package from the IMF, forced it to liberalise its market. Cheap rice flooded in from the US, backed by subsidies and corruption, and local production was wiped out.[11] Now prices for rice have risen 50% since last year and the average Haitian can’t afford to eat.
~
Table 1. Profit increase for some of the world’s largest fertiliser corporations

Company Profits 2007 (US$ million) Increase from 2006 (%)

Potash Corp (Canada) 1,100 72%

Yara (Norway) 1,116 44%

Sinochem (China) 1,100 95%

Mosaic (US) 708 141%

ICL (Israel) 535 43%

K + S (Germany) 420 2.8%

Source: Compiled from corporate reports

While big money is being made from fertilisers, it is just a sideline for Cargill. Its biggest profits come from global trading in agricultural commodities, which, together with a few other big traders, it pretty much monopolises. On 14 April 2008, Cargill announced that its profits from commodity trading for the first quarter of 2008 were 86% higher than the same period in 2007. “Demand for food in developing economies and for energy worldwide is boosting demand for agricultural goods, at the same time that investment monies have streamed into commodity markets,” said Greg Page, Cargill’s chairman and chief executive officer. “Prices are setting new highs and markets are extraordinarily volatile. In this environment, Cargill’s team has done an exceptional job measuring and assessing price risk, and managing the large volume of grains, oilseeds and other commodities moving through our supply chains for customers globally.”[16]

Table 2. Profit increase for some of the world’s largest grain traders

Company Profits 2007 (US$ million) Increase from 2006 (%)

Cargill (US) 2,340 36%

ADM (US) 2,200 67%

ConAgra (US) 764 30%

Bunge (US) 738 49%

Noble Group (Singapore) 258 92%

Marubeni (Japan) 90* 43%*

Source: Compiled from corporate reports
*Data is for Marubeni’s Agri-Marine division only.
Absent from this list is Louis Dreyfus (France), a private agricultural commodities trader with annual sales in excess of US$22 billion, which does not report its profits.
~
It seems that nearly every corporate player in the global food chain is making a killing from the food crisis. The seed and agrochemical companies are doing well too. Monsanto, the world’s largest seed company, reported a 44% increase in overall profits in 2007.[21] DuPont, the second-largest, said that its 2007 profits from seeds increased by 19%, while Syngenta, the top pesticide manufacturer and third-largest company for seeds, saw profits rise 28% in the first quarter of 2008.[22]

Such record profits have nothing to do with any new value that these corporations are producing and they are not one-off windfalls from a sudden shift in supply and demand. Instead, they are a reflection of the extreme power that these middlemen have accrued through the globalisation of the food system. Intimately involved with the shaping of the trade rules that govern today’s food system and tightly in control of markets and the ever more complex financial systems through which global trade operates, these companies are in perfect position to turn food scarcity into immense profits. People have to eat, whatever the cost.

for this complete article goto:
http://www.grain.org/articles/?id=39
 
Yeah there is money to be made in "investments" but at what costs to our humanity ?
I am not a Christian, do not believe in god, and yet I cannot invest in these companies because of the human suffering being caused in the name of profit.

Amazing huh ?
 
And what do we do ? Bush asks for 700 + million to pump back into these companies and pledges billions more. Which will sustain the current failed policy, but appease the greed of american corporations and investors and try to buy our way out of a recession with yet more tax doallars on the cosmmic credit card. And the vast majority of Americans will buy this rhetoric and say what humanitarians we are.
 
Yeah there is money to be made in "investments" but at what costs to our humanity ?
I am not a Christian, do not believe in god, and yet I cannot invest in these companies because of the human suffering being caused in the name of profit.

Amazing huh ?

No--what is amazing is that people are idiotic enough to think that partisan politics will change anything. This globalism is nothing new and both parties support it.
 
you didn't mind basically stealing that land from the dumbass kid that sold it to you. Can the false morality it ain't working.
 
Yeah there is money to be made in "investments" but at what costs to our humanity ?
I am not a Christian, do not believe in god, and yet I cannot invest in these companies because of the human suffering being caused in the name of profit.

Amazing huh ?

Should not invest in food production? Not investing in food production is not going to feed anyone and more people will starve, not just be hungry.

Are you saying that you do not believe in God or you do not believe that there is no God at all?
 
And what do we do ? Bush asks for 700 + million to pump back into these companies and pledges billions more. Which will sustain the current failed policy, but appease the greed of american corporations and investors and try to buy our way out of a recession with yet more tax doallars on the cosmmic credit card. And the vast majority of Americans will buy this rhetoric and say what humanitarians we are.

That's what pisses me off about people like Bush who seem to think that the government can be run like a market. It can't. Giving out random subsidies may boost production a bit, but it's not the most efficient way to go about doing things. Also, things like private prisons are just plain retarded. The best case scenario with the government outsourcing its functions to private firms is that they'll do as good as the government would anyway and cost more. A one-buyer market isn't capitalism, and it isn't going to be. It's just as bad in the long run as a producer monopoly.
 
Should not invest in food production? Not investing in food production is not going to feed anyone and more people will starve, not just be hungry.

Are you saying that you do not believe in God or you do not believe that there is no God at all?

What is the difference to me? If I do not believe in God, heaven, hell or an afterlife. I do realize I could be wrong, but have seen no evidence so far that I am.
 
"Stocks are at their lowest level in 30 years"

Gee, I wonder why they are profitable. Supply decreasing over the past thirty years while demand has been increasing over the same time frame. Imagine that.
 
"Stocks are at their lowest level in 30 years"

Gee, I wonder why they are profitable. Supply decreasing over the past thirty years while demand has been increasing over the same time frame. Imagine that.

If you read the article, It and some others on the subject adsresses that very question.
Our policy of making nations like Haiti dependent on us for food. Is part of the answer. Increased fertilizer prices, etc...
 
If you read the article, It and some others on the subject adsresses that very question.
Our policy of making nations like Haiti dependent on us for food. Is part of the answer. Increased fertilizer prices, etc...

You consider the policies of the World Bank and the IMF to be those only of America ? Interesting how you let other global corporations and policy makers off the hook.
 
If you read the article, It and some others on the subject adsresses that very question.
Our policy of making nations like Haiti dependent on us for food. Is part of the answer. Increased fertilizer prices, etc...

Unlike you, I do actually read the articles posted. Yes, there are policy positions that our government and others take that have led to the food problems.

But the title of YOUR thread suggests that it is the fault of companies within the agg industry for daring to make a profit.

As I have stated elsewhere on this board, if the morons in DC would stop mandating the use of food for fuel, the food problem would not exist. The same goes for other countries that use food for fuel.

But to act like POT is responsible for higher fertilizer costs is ridiculous.

Question for you US... if farmers continue to grow corn for ethanol, rather than alternating crops... does it take more or less fertilizer? Now did POT and others create the mandates for ethanol... or was it the morons in DC?
 
Children of the corn are responsible for it all.

Strange that corn and rice do not grow in the same place.
 
Maybe a little research.............

should be done switching 'switch grass' to Cannibis Sativa(weed) for fuel...after all it would produce 'high' octane fuel and increase the value to those who prefer to smoke the shit...win win for all!;)
 
Back
Top