Master Enemies List

[Flanders]

Obviously, nobody ever told President Trump that background checks is the foundation for the federal government’s enemies list —— law abiding gun owners are the enemy:

But the president also said his administration is having “meaningful” talks with Democrats on gun control.


​

Report: Trump Says More Background Checks for Gun Buyers 'Off the Table'
By VOA News
August 20, 2019 10:36 PM

https://www.voanews.com/usa/report-trump-says-more-background-checks-gun-buyers-table
​

If the asshole wants meaningful talks with lying Democrats he should ask them what happens to the names and addresses of the millions of gun owners who already passed a background check:

The sole purpose of background checks is to set up a data bank so the federal government knows the location of every gun. So how come not one media mouth ever suggested that the government must delete all records of every person after they clear a background check? (I am probably being naive. There is no way in hell the government will delete an essential component of confiscation.)
​

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...me-Prayer-For-Democrats&p=3196693#post3196693

and here

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...ues-Is-He-Talking-About&p=2887277#post2887277

NOTE: “Enemies lists” came a long way from the days presidents had a few hundred names on their personal list. In short: Technology made the federal government’s master enemies list inevitable:

Data bank

In telecommunications, computing, and information architecture, a data bank or databank is a repository of information on one or more subjects – a database – that is organized in a way that facilitates local or remote information retrieval and is able to process a large number of continual queries over a long period of time. A data bank may be either centralized or decentralized, though most usage of this term refers to centralized storage and retrieval of information, by way of analogy to a monetary bank. The data in a data bank can be anything from scientific information like global temperature readings, and governmental information like census statistics, to financial-system records like credit card transactions, or the inventory available from various suppliers.

Data bank may also refer to an organization primarily concerned with the construction and maintenance of such a database. The term databank is also obsolete (1960s through 1970s) computer jargon for database itself, and is frequently used in that sense in materials written in that period.
​

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_bank

Finally, if Trump truly wants to protect and defend the 2[SUP]nd[/SUP] Amendment he should print, and frame, life size copies of this cartoon:

https://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/mrz081419dAPR_A20190814104514.jpg
​

then send one to every member of Congress with a note attached: Hang it in your office.

 

[Flanders]

The sole purpose of background checks is to set up a data bank so the federal government knows the location of every gun. So how come not one media mouth ever suggested that the government must delete all records of every person after they clear a background check?

In Democratspeak the word NEGOTIATE means President Trump must:

“. . . expand background checks.”


​

Meet the Democratic senator trying to negotiate gun control with Trump
By Jordain Carney
08/28/19 06:00 AM EDT

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate...or-trying-to-negotiate-gun-control-with-trump
​

 

[Flanders]

It's no secret that technology plays an important role in our lives. Almost every single aspect of our life is ruled by technology, from smart phones to computers and the internet. That's why it's not surprising to know that Google and Facebook are keeping tabs on gun owners' firearms. [LOCATIONS]

According to The Firearms Blog (TFB), the two tech giants are scanning users' pictures to look for serial numbers. They're then creating an index of every person's firearms based on the image scans. If you've posted a picture of your firearm on a social networking site and didn't smear out the serial number, chances are it's indexed on Google images. Simply type in the serial number in quotes and search images. What comes up?

The guys at TFB went through their image library and found images of various firearms and silencers where the serial number is clearly visible. They then typed it into Google and viola! Every image from their website showed up in the image results.

Although it's unlikely for a random person to have your the serial number on your firearms, it is absolutely dangerous for social media giants to have this information. Facebook and Instagram are both owned by the same company. Same with YouTube and Google. When these platforms data mine this information, this creates an extremely dangerous situation. [CONFISCATION]

Gun owners have worried about firearm registries because they inevitably lead to confiscation. If the government has tabs on every single gun in America it makes it easier for them to come beating on our doors, demanding that we hand them over (just as Beto has proposed). These social media giants and their owners are lefties. For all we know, these private organizations can willingly hand over a person's name and the serial numbers on their firearms to the government. And before anyone says this is an invasion of privacy, just remember: when you signed up for Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and every other social networking website out there, you agreed to their terms and conditions. Anything you put on their website becomes their property, meaning they can decide how to use that information against you.

If you're going to share pictures of your firearms, suppressors or anything with a serial number, take the extra 30 seconds and blur out the serial number. Better to be safe than sorry.


​

Gun Owners: Here's Why You Should Think Twice Before Posting Pictures of Your Firearms on Social Media
Beth Baumann
Posted: Oct 23, 2019 6:20 PM

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/bethb...res-of-your-firearms-on-social-media-n2555263
​

You better believe that Facebook and Google are working for the government despite the crap questions asked at committee hearings:

The sole purpose of background checks is to set up a data bank so the federal government knows the location of every gun. So how come not one media mouth ever suggested that the government must delete all records of every person after they clear a background check? (I am probably being naive. There is no way in hell the government will delete an essential component of confiscation.)

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...me-Prayer-For-Democrats&p=3196693#post3196693

and here

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...ues-Is-He-Talking-About&p=2887277#post2887277