McCain Endorsed by Al Quaeda

Timshel

New member
http://www.independent.org/newsroom/article.asp?id=2355

n the battle for endorsements in the presidential campaign, Barack Obama snared a strong nod from former Secretary of State Colin Powell and John McCain received an equally strong recommendation from al-Qaeda.

Al-Qaeda? Yes, you heard right, al-Qaeda! This endorsement indicates what has long been known: al-Qaeda is fairly sophisticated politically. And this doesn’t mean McCain is the more accomplished candidate—in fact, apparently the group believes he is the more gullible of the two men.

Quite bluntly, al-Qaeda says it wants McCain to win essentially because it thinks he is most likely to continue Bush’s macho “bull in the China shop” war on terror. There has been a lot of bull in the China shop, and al-Qaeda wants to make sure it continues.

According to al-Hesbah website, which has close ties to the group, “Al-Qaeda will have to support McCain in the coming election.” The website was confident that McCain would continue the “failing march of his predecessor.” The site argued that a terrorist attack could push the election into McCain’s column, and thus lead to an expansion of U.S. military commitments in the Islamic world in an attempt take revenge on al-Qaeda. The website already brags about having lured the Bush administration and the U.S. into a trap that has “exhausted its resources and bankrupted its economy” and expects that to accelerate if the even more hawkish McCain gets elected.
 
Maybe this is just the boost that the flagging McCains campaign needs, going into the last week.

I'm sure the domestic terrorist vote, hereto monopolised by the Obamas campaign, will switch on mass and turn that election day map red once more.
 
Maybe this is just the boost that the flagging McCains campaign needs, going into the last week.

I'm sure the domestic terrorist vote, hereto monopolised by the Obamas campaign, will switch on mass and turn that election day map red once more.
Well, I heard the negotiations were fierce and that McCain barely pulled this coveted endorsement.
 
http://www.independent.org/newsroom/article.asp?id=2355

n the battle for endorsements in the presidential campaign, Barack Obama snared a strong nod from former Secretary of State Colin Powell and John McCain received an equally strong recommendation from al-Qaeda.

Al-Qaeda? Yes, you heard right, al-Qaeda! This endorsement indicates what has long been known: al-Qaeda is fairly sophisticated politically. And this doesn’t mean McCain is the more accomplished candidate—in fact, apparently the group believes he is the more gullible of the two men.

Quite bluntly, al-Qaeda says it wants McCain to win essentially because it thinks he is most likely to continue Bush’s macho “bull in the China shop” war on terror. There has been a lot of bull in the China shop, and al-Qaeda wants to make sure it continues.

According to al-Hesbah website, which has close ties to the group, “Al-Qaeda will have to support McCain in the coming election.” The website was confident that McCain would continue the “failing march of his predecessor.” The site argued that a terrorist attack could push the election into McCain’s column, and thus lead to an expansion of U.S. military commitments in the Islamic world in an attempt take revenge on al-Qaeda. The website already brags about having lured the Bush administration and the U.S. into a trap that has “exhausted its resources and bankrupted its economy” and expects that to accelerate if the even more hawkish McCain gets elected.

Reverse psychology perhaps??? Tell us who they "want" in the hopes that we don't give it to them?
 
Reverse psychology perhaps??? Tell us who they "want" in the hopes that we don't give it to them?
This would show a bit of sanity. Attempting to do the same thing over and over again, expecting a different result is a sign of instability.

It could be they learned from the past and know that who they endorse seemed to keep losing, extrapolating logically from that it would seem that they would now endorse whomever they hoped to lose....

But who really cares? Almost nobody in the US will vote for or against somebody because of this "endorsement". I don't think it helped or hurt even John Kerry.
 
Back
Top