McCarthy Forecasts Garland Impeachment Inquiry if Whistleblower Allegations True

ptif219

Verified User
Impeachment of Garland would be a start to get rid of corruption in the DOJ

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...d-impeachment-whistleblower-allegations-true/


House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) on Sunday signaled that an impeachment inquiry of Attorney General Merrick Garland would be imminent if whistleblower allegations that U.S. Attorney for the District of Delaware David Weiss wanted to appoint a special counsel in the Department of Justice’s Hunter Biden probe are true.

McCarthy retweeted allegations made by the whistleblower, IRS Criminal Supervisory Special Agent Gary A. Shapley Jr, noting if his allegations are true, “this will be a significant part of a larger impeachment inquiry into Merrick Garland’s weaponization of DOJ.”His retweet included a post from Washington Examiner Chief Correspondent Byron York, who noted that Shapley alleged Weiss wanted charges against Biden to be brought in Washington, DC. Moreover, York included Shapley’s legal team’s claim that during an October 7, 2022, meeting at Weiss’s office, six witnesses observed him state that he “did not have authority to charge in other districts and had thus requested special counsel status.”

The claim, which came on Friday, added:

Those six witnesses include Baltimore FBI Special Agent in Charge Tom Sobocinski and Assistant Special Agent in Charge Ryeshia Holley, IRS Assistant Special Agent in Charge Gary Shapley and Special Agent in Charge Darrell Waldon, who also independently and contemporaneously corroborated Mr. Shapley’s account in an email, now public as Exhibit 10, following p. 148 of his testimony transcript. Mr. Shapley would have no insight into why Mr. Weiss’s would make these statements at the October 7, 2022 meeting if they were false. That Mr. Weiss made these statements is easily corroborated, and it is up to him and the Justice Department to reconcile the evidence of his October 7, 2022 statements with contrary statements by Mr. Weiss and the Attorney General to Congress.

However, on the same day, Garland denied that Weiss ever asked him for a special counsel to be appointed in the matter, as Breitbart News reported:
 
Any version of 'truth' belongs no where near any of these fake "whistleblower" reports.

7qnd4d.jpg
 
Impeachment of Garland would be a start to get rid of corruption in the DOJ

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...d-impeachment-whistleblower-allegations-true/

What allegation is alleged?
Weiss was given authority to charge crimes but only in the district he worked in?
Weiss didn't want to charge crimes?
Weiss claims to have requested a special counsel?
There doesn't seem to be anything in this story that would show that Garland interfered with Weiss. Failing to appoint a special prosecutor even if asked to do so is not a reason to impeach.
 
What allegation is alleged?
Weiss was given authority to charge crimes but only in the district he worked in?
Weiss didn't want to charge crimes?
Weiss claims to have requested a special counsel?
There doesn't seem to be anything in this story that would show that Garland interfered with Weiss. Failing to appoint a special prosecutor even if asked to do so is not a reason to impeach.

Weiss is an independent prosecutor. He is a Trumpian and a lifetime Republican. Garland selected him so rightys would not whine. That was an impossible aim.
 
Impeachment of Garland would be a start to get rid of corruption in the DOJ

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...d-impeachment-whistleblower-allegations-true/

So funny, I posted on the whistleblower two weeks ago and all the board Marxists claimed I was lying...

This is how the left does it, deny deny deny deny
when that fails - claim it's not a big deal
when that fails - claim it's old news


This is just going through the stages the treasonous democrats always use.
 
The whistleblowers are very credible sources

Gonna be hard for Bidens lawyers to debunk them

You would have to be able to track them down and actually bring them in to speak with them to know that.

BUt then that proved dangerous in the past...


201203200118-melissa-carone-rudy-giuliani-witness-michigan-ebof-vpx-00000000.png



I can see how you learned from that and now find it better to lose the whistleblower and not present them.

I mean, how many informants, whistleblower and key documents all touted on Right Media as being fatal to Biden have never materialized or been presented?
 
Prove they are fake...with links.

Whistle Blowers take incredible risks when the come forward.

What a stupid thing to say.


I am a whistleblower and i am now reporting i have information on Trump murdering someone.

Prove i am a fake?

Oh you cannot, can you as that cannot be proved.

What has to happen is the whistleblowers need to be presented and verified and in most instances so far, those presented by these republiclowns are not actual whistleblowers. Just calling yourself one does not make you one.
 
What a stupid thing to say.


I am a whistleblower and i am now reporting i have information on Trump murdering someone.

Prove i am a fake?

Oh you cannot, can you as that cannot be proved.

What has to happen is the whistleblowers need to be presented and verified and in most instances so far, those presented by these republiclowns are not actual whistleblowers. Just calling yourself one does not make you one.

You mean like a climate scientist?
 
You mean like a climate scientist?

Yes climate scientists also need to be presented and their claims tested and verified over time.

They will actually do that unlike these 'Whistleblowers' who keep getting lost.

Not sure if you thought you were actually making a good point...or any point, but you did not.
 
Back
Top