Mississippi's Ballot Trick

FUCK THE POLICE

911 EVERY DAY
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/11/opinion/11thu1.html?partner=rssnyt&emc=rss

Editorial
Mississippi’s Ballot Trick

Published: September 10, 2008

Mississippi’s governor, Haley Barbour, and its secretary of state have come up with a particularly cynical dirty trick for the November election. Let’s call it: “Where’s the Senate race?”


Defying state law, they have decided to hide a hard-fought race for the United States Senate at the bottom of the ballot, where they clearly are hoping some voters will overlook it. Their proposed design is not only illegal. It shows a deep contempt for Mississippi’s voters.

Republicans have long had a lock on the state’s two Senate seats. But this year, former Gov. Ronnie Musgrove, a Democrat, has been running close to Senator Roger Wicker, a Republican, in the polls. Mr. Wicker was appointed to the seat by Governor Barbour in late December after Trent Lott stepped down.

Mississippi election law clearly states that federal elections must go at the top of ballots. And the secretary of state, Delbert Hosemann, plans to list the state’s other Senate race — incumbent Thad Cochran is running far ahead of his Democratic challenger, Erik Fleming — where it belongs, right below the presidential contest.

But Mr. Hosemann argues that because the Wicker-Musgrove race is a special election to fill the remainder of Mr. Lott’s term, he is free to place it at the bottom, below state and county races.

Mr. Hosemann is insisting on that placement even after the state attorney general’s office notified him that his ballot design violates state law.

Mr. Hosemann’s ballot also violates the Voting Rights Act, which requires that changes in election procedures that could make it harder for people to vote — and this certainly fits that bill — be cleared in advance with the Justice Department.

This is not a dispute over aesthetics. Mr. Hosemann’s decision could easily change the outcome of the Wicker-Musgrove election.

Some voters, including the elderly, the least educated and first-time voters, have more trouble than others navigating complicated ballots. Many of these voters are more likely to vote for Democrats than Republicans. And, yes, Governor Barbour and Mr. Hosemann are both Republicans.

A local election official is suing to put the Wicker-Musgrove race back where it belongs. The state court judge who is hearing the case on Thursday should order that the Senate race be placed at the top of the ballot. Even if she does the right thing, we fear, that will not end the matter.

The case is likely to wind up, on appeal, in Mississippi’s Supreme Court. Voting rights advocates are worried that the Republican-leaning court will decide the case on partisan lines, rather than on the law.

If the state courts do not provide relief, supporters of fair elections should take the case to federal court. They will need to move quickly since time to prepare ballots is fast running out. Mississippi’s voters have a right to a ballot that conforms with the law — and that is not designed to win a Senate seat by trickery.
 
I love how the New York Times essentially says its dumb people who vote for Democrats. And I love how the 'elderly' who have probably been voting most or a good portion of their life are now too dumb to understand how to vote.

The Times only cares about this because they think it hurts the chances of their candidate. However like a blind squirrel that finds a nut the Times is actually right about this. The Senate vote should be at the top of the ballot.
 
I love how the New York Times essentially says its dumb people who vote for Democrats. And I love how the 'elderly' who have probably been voting most or a good portion of their life are now too dumb to understand how to vote.

The Times only cares about this because they think it hurts the chances of their candidate. However like a blind squirrel that finds a nut the Times is actually right about this. The Senate vote should be at the top of the ballot.

I don't care as long as Musgrove wins. :)
 
I will gladly admit that the Democrats in Mississippi aren't the sort of liberals I really associate with, but I'm not voting for Musgrove for his own personal views anyway.
 
"The case is likely to wind up, on appeal, in Mississippi’s Supreme Court. Voting rights advocates are worried that the Republican-leaning court will decide the case on partisan lines, rather than on the law."

The republicon way. game the system anyway you can.
 
They redistricted Mississippi's supreme court with a ballot measure a while back. It converted it from nine single member districts to three three member districts. The stated purpose was to keep up with population change, but it was pretty clear from the way the districts were drawn that it was meant to suppress the heavily black areas voice. The court is now practically all conservative.
 
It happens this way a lot these days. The Republicans outright contradict a law, the Democrats bring it up before the neutral Jackson court, they agree, the Republicans appeal to the court they own and can contradict the law. For instance, the state constitution says this special election was supposed to happen in March 2008. Conservative judicial activists reinterpreted this as too rigid and set it to happen in November 2008, which luckily gave their guy some more time to cozy in his senate seat, run negative ads with his huge PAC and corporation funded budget, and try to get rid of Musgrove's previously large lead. It worked.
 
Last edited:
They've been subverting democracy for so long that they've got it down. I said in 2000 that there's been a coup in this country and it might take a while to get it back.
 
I love how the New York Times essentially says its dumb people who vote for Democrats. And I love how the 'elderly' who have probably been voting most or a good portion of their life are now too dumb to understand how to vote.

The Times only cares about this because they think it hurts the chances of their candidate. However like a blind squirrel that finds a nut the Times is actually right about this. The Senate vote should be at the top of the ballot.
I love how you have completely ignored that it is illegal, that it is gaming the election and that if the Republican was winning with a large margin it would be right up top.
 
I love how you have completely ignored that it is illegal, that it is gaming the election and that if the Republican was winning with a large margin it would be right up top.

Let me reply for Cawacko:

What? Huh? Do you know how I got here? Who are you? Do you know who I am?
 
I love how you have completely ignored that it is illegal, that it is gaming the election and that if the Republican was winning with a large margin it would be right up top.

Soc, where did I ignore it? What part of my last sentence that said "the Senate vote should be at the top of the ballot" implies I'm ignoring it or not saying it is wrong? If I copy that sentence five or ten times in a row would it make it more clear?
 
Soc, where did I ignore it? What part of my last sentence that said "the Senate vote should be at the top of the ballot" implies I'm ignoring it or not saying it is wrong? If I copy that sentence five or ten times in a row would it make it more clear?
No. SRCD strikes again.
 
I will gladly admit that the Democrats in Mississippi aren't the sort of liberals I really associate with, but I'm not voting for Musgrove for his own personal views anyway.

They are likely the sort of democrat that I am.......that guys like Dan Boren are. A lot of southern democrats are my sort of democrat.
 
Back
Top