More About Canada's Failed Health Care System.

Robo

Verified User
On November 2, 2015, an elderly man presented himself at the emergency room of St. Mary’s Hospital in Montreal, complaining of severe abdominal pain. He lost consciousness; an ultrasound revealed an aortic aneurism, likely accompanied by severe internal bleeding.

The patient needed immediate surgery. Instead of operating, the hospital transferred him by ambulance to another institution. He died before he could be treated there.

Why wouldn’t St. Mary’s operate on this critically ill patient? Because the requisite procedure was deemed “eccentric to the mission” of the hospital. Translation: It was no longer performed there, even though a vascular surgeon was on call at the time and could have saved the man’s life.

Tragically, this isn’t the first time such a policy has killed a patient. At a press conference last October, Ontario doctors decried the health care rationing which resulted in the death of a terminally-ill patient in the emergency room. In Saskatchewan, a hospital is under investigation after a man with heart disease died after waiting three and a half hours in the ER complaining of chest pains. Earlier that year, in P.E.I., a woman recounted how her father-in-law died after waiting days for an ambulance to transport him to another hospital for treatment.

In 2014, a Fraser Institute report on wait times and mortality found that, between 1994 and 2009, “increases in wait times for medically necessary elective treatment may be associated with 44,273 additional female deaths … (representing) 2.5 per cent of total female deaths during the period or 1.2 per cent of total mortality (male and female) during the period.” For non life-threatening procedures, such as knee or hip surgery, over-long wait times are also routine, according to the Canadian Institute for Health Information; while they may not mean death, they do lead to prolonged agony, lost productivity and dependency on pain medication.

open quote 761b1bHealth authorities and hospitals impose rationing to stay within budget. Meanwhile, Canadians with the money to do so take it outside the country to spend on private alternatives.
So it’s no surprise that more and more Canadians are seeking care outside the country. Another Fraser study found that 52,523 patients travelled outside the country to obtain medical treatment in 2014, up from 41,838 patients in 2013. The main reasons were delays in obtaining treatment, followed by a desire to obtain state-of-the-art care.

https://ipolitics.ca/2016/01/11/tim...-our-public-health-care-system-is-flatlining/
 
On November 2, 2015, an elderly man presented himself at the emergency room of St. Mary’s Hospital in Montreal, complaining of severe abdominal pain. He lost consciousness; an ultrasound revealed an aortic aneurism, likely accompanied by severe internal bleeding.

The patient needed immediate surgery. Instead of operating, the hospital transferred him by ambulance to another institution. He died before he could be treated there.

Why wouldn’t St. Mary’s operate on this critically ill patient? Because the requisite procedure was deemed “eccentric to the mission” of the hospital. Translation: It was no longer performed there, even though a vascular surgeon was on call at the time and could have saved the man’s life.

Tragically, this isn’t the first time such a policy has killed a patient. At a press conference last October, Ontario doctors decried the health care rationing which resulted in the death of a terminally-ill patient in the emergency room. In Saskatchewan, a hospital is under investigation after a man with heart disease died after waiting three and a half hours in the ER complaining of chest pains. Earlier that year, in P.E.I., a woman recounted how her father-in-law died after waiting days for an ambulance to transport him to another hospital for treatment.

In 2014, a Fraser Institute report on wait times and mortality found that, between 1994 and 2009, “increases in wait times for medically necessary elective treatment may be associated with 44,273 additional female deaths … (representing) 2.5 per cent of total female deaths during the period or 1.2 per cent of total mortality (male and female) during the period.” For non life-threatening procedures, such as knee or hip surgery, over-long wait times are also routine, according to the Canadian Institute for Health Information; while they may not mean death, they do lead to prolonged agony, lost productivity and dependency on pain medication.

open quote 761b1bHealth authorities and hospitals impose rationing to stay within budget. Meanwhile, Canadians with the money to do so take it outside the country to spend on private alternatives.
So it’s no surprise that more and more Canadians are seeking care outside the country. Another Fraser study found that 52,523 patients travelled outside the country to obtain medical treatment in 2014, up from 41,838 patients in 2013. The main reasons were delays in obtaining treatment, followed by a desire to obtain state-of-the-art care.

https://ipolitics.ca/2016/01/11/tim...-our-public-health-care-system-is-flatlining/

Poor Bobo, thinks all hospitals perform all procedures in the US.
Poor Lil' Bobo
 
More About Canada's Failed Health Care System
bravo.gif



 
Poor Bobo, thinks all hospitals perform all procedures in the US.
Poor Lil' Bobo

Socialized Medicine Elsewhere Shows Why It Is a Failure
January 22, 2008 International Health Systems Commentary

By Grace-Marie Turner

Britain’s system of socialized medicine is enough to make your teeth hurt – literally.

Its citizens rely upon the government-run National Health Service that is designed to provide free access to every medical service, including dental care. But like all socialized medicine schemes, it has produced long lines, a shortage of medical professionals, and shoddy care.

William Kelly, a resident of a working-class suburb of Manchester, represented the frustrations of many Britons when he plucked out one of his own teeth last year. Why? Because the pain had become intolerable, and the wait to see a dentist was unbearably long. When he spoke with The New York Times last summer, Kelly had been unable to get a dentist appointment for six years.

At the beginning of 2006, only 49 percent of British adults and 63 percent of children were registered with public dentists. Because dentists are paid on a per-patient basis, the government’s system encourages public dentists to treat as many patients as possible, often leading to inadequate care and roughshod work.

http://galen.org/topics/socialized-medicine-elsewhere-shows-why-it-is-a-failure/
 
Bobo is Canadian.

Poor Bobo.

Socialized Medicine Elsewhere Shows Why It Is a Failure
January 22, 2008 International Health Systems Commentary

By Grace-Marie Turner

Britain’s system of socialized medicine is enough to make your teeth hurt – literally.

Its citizens rely upon the government-run National Health Service that is designed to provide free access to every medical service, including dental care. But like all socialized medicine schemes, it has produced long lines, a shortage of medical professionals, and shoddy care.

William Kelly, a resident of a working-class suburb of Manchester, represented the frustrations of many Britons when he plucked out one of his own teeth last year. Why? Because the pain had become intolerable, and the wait to see a dentist was unbearably long. When he spoke with The New York Times last summer, Kelly had been unable to get a dentist appointment for six years.

At the beginning of 2006, only 49 percent of British adults and 63 percent of children were registered with public dentists. Because dentists are paid on a per-patient basis, the government’s system encourages public dentists to treat as many patients as possible, often leading to inadequate care and roughshod work.

http://galen.org/topics/socialized-medicine-elsewhere-shows-why-it-is-a-failure/
 
Bla, bla, bla, bla

Socialized Medicine Elsewhere Shows Why It Is a Failure
January 22, 2008 International Health Systems Commentary

By Grace-Marie Turner

Britain’s system of socialized medicine is enough to make your teeth hurt – literally.

Its citizens rely upon the government-run National Health Service that is designed to provide free access to every medical service, including dental care. But like all socialized medicine schemes, it has produced long lines, a shortage of medical professionals, and shoddy care.

William Kelly, a resident of a working-class suburb of Manchester, represented the frustrations of many Britons when he plucked out one of his own teeth last year. Why? Because the pain had become intolerable, and the wait to see a dentist was unbearably long. When he spoke with The New York Times last summer, Kelly had been unable to get a dentist appointment for six years.

At the beginning of 2006, only 49 percent of British adults and 63 percent of children were registered with public dentists. Because dentists are paid on a per-patient basis, the government’s system encourages public dentists to treat as many patients as possible, often leading to inadequate care and roughshod work.

http://galen.org/topics/socialized-medicine-elsewhere-shows-why-it-is-a-failure/
 
bla, bla, bla

Socialized Medicine Elsewhere Shows Why It Is a Failure
January 22, 2008 International Health Systems Commentary

By Grace-Marie Turner

Britain’s system of socialized medicine is enough to make your teeth hurt – literally.

Its citizens rely upon the government-run National Health Service that is designed to provide free access to every medical service, including dental care. But like all socialized medicine schemes, it has produced long lines, a shortage of medical professionals, and shoddy care.

William Kelly, a resident of a working-class suburb of Manchester, represented the frustrations of many Britons when he plucked out one of his own teeth last year. Why? Because the pain had become intolerable, and the wait to see a dentist was unbearably long. When he spoke with The New York Times last summer, Kelly had been unable to get a dentist appointment for six years.

At the beginning of 2006, only 49 percent of British adults and 63 percent of children were registered with public dentists. Because dentists are paid on a per-patient basis, the government’s system encourages public dentists to treat as many patients as possible, often leading to inadequate care and roughshod work.

http://galen.org/topics/socialized-medicine-elsewhere-shows-why-it-is-a-failure/
 
bla, bla, bla

Socialized Medicine Elsewhere Shows Why It Is a Failure
January 22, 2008 International Health Systems Commentary

By Grace-Marie Turner

Britain’s system of socialized medicine is enough to make your teeth hurt – literally.

Its citizens rely upon the government-run National Health Service that is designed to provide free access to every medical service, including dental care. But like all socialized medicine schemes, it has produced long lines, a shortage of medical professionals, and shoddy care.

William Kelly, a resident of a working-class suburb of Manchester, represented the frustrations of many Britons when he plucked out one of his own teeth last year. Why? Because the pain had become intolerable, and the wait to see a dentist was unbearably long. When he spoke with The New York Times last summer, Kelly had been unable to get a dentist appointment for six years.

At the beginning of 2006, only 49 percent of British adults and 63 percent of children were registered with public dentists. Because dentists are paid on a per-patient basis, the government’s system encourages public dentists to treat as many patients as possible, often leading to inadequate care and roughshod work.

http://galen.org/topics/socialized-medicine-elsewhere-shows-why-it-is-a-failure/
 
Does anyone-else notice.....every time Robo gets an ass-whuppin'.....regarding Medicare For All, in Canada.....Robo starts a whole, new thread??
bigstock-Weak-Rubber-Stamp-86373164.jpg
 
Yep..... He spends a thousand posts a year telling ppl what they should vote/think, he of course does neither...:whome:
 
Does anyone-else notice.....every time Robo gets an whuppin.regarding Medicare For all in Canada Robo starts a whole, new thread

But there's just so many threads to choose from! The Commie healthcare systems are such a worldwide disaster.:rofl2::mun::cof1:


SOCIALIZED MEDICINE A GLOBAL FAILURE

There is indeed a lot to learn from foreign, government-run single-payer systems — just not what Sanders and others might like to hear. From Canada to the United Kingdom and even Scandinavia, single-payer systems have proven cripplingly expensive even as they limit patients’ ability to access quality care.

Consider Canada’s true single-payer system. Patients must wait an average of more than two months to see a specialist after getting a referral from their general practitioner, according to the Fraser Institute, a nonpartisan Canadian think tank. Patients can expect to wait another 9.8 weeks, on average, before receiving the treatment they need from that specialist.

Overall, Canadians now wait even longer than last year — and 97 percent longer than they did in 1993.

Access to care is so poor, in fact, that 52,000 Canadians flee to the United States each year for medical attention. They refuse to wait in line for care as their health deteriorates.

The situation is no better under Great Britain’s mainly government-run health system.

As of this summer, 3.4 million Brits were stuck on waiting lists — a 36 percent uptick since 2010. Last year, about a million people had to wait more than four months to get treatment. Almost 300,000 waited at least six months.

As with most centrally-controlled bureaucracies, the British health system is inefficient. According to a recent government report, the country’s National Health Service is plagued by problems like neglect, incorrectly-administered medications and inadequate care for the dying. In some cases, the report concluded that the treatment of patients was “appalling.” Last month, more than 40,000 young doctors threatened an all-out strike over their hours.

As for Scandinavia, patients there would likely advise Sanders to reject socialized medicine.

In recent years, Swedish residents have gravitated toward private insurance to avoid the rationed care and long wait times common in the country’s single-payer system. Today, roughly one in 10 Swedes — more than half a million people — has a private health insurance policy.

As the Swedish economist Nima Sanandaji recently explained, the country’s socialist experiment has proven “such a colossal failure that few even in the left today view the memory as something positive.”

https://www.pacificresearch.org/arti...lobal-failure/
 
Back
Top