Mormons Frown on Cigs and Gambling - But They Made Romney Rich

CanceledB

Banned
Really? The article I posted came out less than five hours ago. Someone debunked it since then? Let's see the proof. Cite, please.

no, it is up to you to prove i'm wrong. LOL. now your own words are coming back to bite you in the ass.

funny how you're answering my bait post, but you run away from the tough questions. wuss.

and the story is much older than five hours idiot. this stuff came out months ago.
 
no, it is up to you to prove i'm wrong. LOL. now your own words are coming back to bite you in the ass.

funny how you're answering my bait post, but you run away from the tough questions. wuss.

and the story is much older than five hours idiot. this stuff came out months ago.

Wrong. Look at the date on my article. You said it was debunked - prove it. And remember - your cite must be newer than my article in order to debunk it. ;)
 
Wrong. Look at the date on my article. You said it was debunked - prove it. And remember - your cite must be newer than my article in order to debunk it. ;)

The article I read was five hours old, nothing has been debunked and the Gawker is asking people to help review the docs that were leaked!
 
The article I read was five hours old, nothing has been debunked and the Gawker is asking people to help review the docs that were leaked!

Yurt has no credibility and will spew any nonsense for the sake of argument, because even negative interaction is attention. This is the only social life he has.
 
Wrong. Look at the date on my article. You said it was debunked - prove it. And remember - your cite must be newer than my article in order to debunk it. ;)

no i don't. i'm using your logic. you must prove me wrong. or is one standard for you and another for everyone else?

the issues in this article were out a long time ago.

you "missed" this troll:

it has been over 24 hours since you refused to address questions and posts in the abortion thread....that i posted more than 3 times.

ironic troll bijou is ironic.
 
Last edited:
I typed in Romney campaign debunks gambling ties and came up with 0 articles. I think he wants this information to just go way. I not think the LDS church will care much becuse of how much money he donates to them!
 
no i don't. i'm using your logic. you must prove me wrong. or is one standard for you and another for everyone else?

the issues in this article were out a long time ago.

you "missed" this troll:

it has been over 24 hours since you refused to address questions and posts in the abortion thread....that i posted more than 3 times.

ironic troll bijou is ironic.

The article stands. You said it was debunked. The debunking proof is on you. Even a retard understands something this simple.
 
nope. you said i was wrong, according to you, you must prove me wrong.

When one disagrees, they post proof as to why. Something you're unfamiliar with, apparently. Some other 'tard at Special Ed taught you that mumbling and dots make you sound smarter.

Don't worry, moron. No one expects you to refute Darla's claim. If you could've, you already would have.

you disagree with me....thus, you must post proof as to why. if could've, you already would have.

:)
 
Oh, looky - cigs, casinos and dead embryos aren't the only enterprises making Mittens rich....

Mitt Romney's Undisclosed Relationship With Private Prisons

Gawker released over 950 pages of documents relating to Bain Capital and Mitt Romney's investments, mostly for the years 2008-2010. While I haven't gone through even a fraction of them yet, one entity leaped out at me -- Brookside Capital Partners Fund.

Mitt Romney's Relationship to Brookside Capital Partners Fund, LP (BCPF)

We've heard a lot about Bain Capital and Sankaty Investors, but not too much about BCPF. However, it was listed as an asset on Romney's 2006 disclosures filed while governor of Massachusetts with ownership set at 3 percent.

BCPF goes back much farther than 2006, however. In 1997 and 1998, when Romney was still an active partner in Bain Capital, the structure of Brookside and related entities looked like this, according to the first SEC filing I could find for it:

Brookside Capital Investors, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership ("Brookside Investors"), is the sole general partner of the Brookside Fund. Brookside Capital Investors, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Brookside Inc."), is the sole general partner of Brookside Investors. The executive officers of Brookside Inc. are set forth on Schedule A hereto. Mr. W. Mitt Romney is the sole shareholder, sole director, President and Chief Executive Officer of Brookside Inc. and thus is the controlling person of Brookside Inc.

To translate that labyrinth a bit, Mitt Romney was the sole shareholder of an entity that was the sole general partner of the investment partnership, BCPF. As general partner, Romney could expect the following:

Pursuant to the terms of a partnership agreement, Brookside Investors as general partner of the Brookside Fund receives a percentage of profits generated by the Brookside Fund. Brookside Inc., as general partner of Brookside Investors, receives a percentage of profits from Brookside Investors. Mr. W. Mitt Romney receives a percentage of profits from Brookside Investors.

There is LOTS more in the linked title. LOTS more. :D
 
Back
Top