Obama the stuttering mess!

[patriot66]

Teleprompter must have broke!

Obama’s Stuttering Moment During Speech Bashing Trump Prompts Some Absolutely Blistering Reactions
Jun. 2, 2016 8:48am Dave Urbanski
3.8K
Shares

During President Barack Obama’s speech in Elkhart, Indiana, on Wednesday, he didn’t mention presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump by name — but as the New York Times reported, there was no mistaking who Obama was railing against during his time behind the mic.

While much of the focus was on the president’s strident foray into the 2016 election, one moment during his speech has been getting attention: Obama’s very noticeable stutters and extra long pauses while making a point about “divisions.”
Image source: YouTube

Image source: YouTube

“If we turn against each other based on divisions of race or religion,” he began — and then the president seemed to have trouble coming up with the words to follow “if,” which he repeated multiple times.

Obama then came back with a warning to not fall “for a bunch of okie doke just because, you know, it sounds funny or the tweets are provocative” — along with some noticeable pauses — “then we won’t build on the progress that we’ve started.”

Here’s the clip:

And as you might expect, Twitter was none too kind:

(H/T: The Gateway Pundit)

 

[Stelakh]

Well, what can you say, really?

I mean, Trump? Trumps got words. "The best words."

 

[mogur]

Teleprompter must have broke!

(H/T: The Gateway Pundit)

Really? Still harping on the teleprompter accusations? And then piling on the stuttering?

Look, Obama is one of the best speech givers of recent years. Whether he uses cue cards, teleprompters, or memorization, doesn't really matter. Palin reads inked crib notes on her hands. If she gave a good speech, I really could care less about how she prompts herself. But, rambling flight of ideas does not make her a good speaker, nor does she have a message worth paying attention to. Obama tries to lead us to a better society. Palin tries to simply piss us off about her perceived paranoias.

The point here is, why are you wasting energy bashing a lame duck? Is it just vengeance, or do you really think that marginalizing Obama somehow makes the world better? Do you think about the future? Do you want your principles to be upheld? Then use your energy to fight for the person that can carry us forward into your version of a better society. We may disagree, but I think that you are simply wrong to bash people about their idiosyncrasies, without a principled argument.

 

[Phantasmal]

Really? Still harping on the teleprompter accusations? And then piling on the stuttering?

Look, Obama is one of the best speech givers of recent years. Whether he uses cue cards, teleprompters, or memorization, doesn't really matter. Palin reads inked crib notes on her hands. If she gave a good speech, I really could care less about how she prompts herself. But, rambling flight of ideas does not make her a good speaker, nor does she have a message worth paying attention to. Obama tries to lead us to a better society. Palin tries to simply piss us off about her perceived paranoias.

The point here is, why are you wasting energy bashing a lame duck? Is it just vengeance, or do you really think that marginalizing Obama somehow makes the world better? Do you think about the future? Do you want your principles to be upheld? Then use your energy to fight for the person that can carry us forward into your version of a better society. We may disagree, but I think that you are simply wrong to bash people about their idiosyncrasies, without a principled argument.

51% favorability!

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Really? Still harping on the teleprompter accusations? And then piling on the stuttering?

Look, Obama is one of the best speech givers of recent years. Whether he uses cue cards, teleprompters, or memorization, doesn't really matter. Palin reads inked crib notes on her hands. If she gave a good speech, I really could care less about how she prompts herself. But, rambling flight of ideas does not make her a good speaker, nor does she have a message worth paying attention to. Obama tries to lead us to a better society. Palin tries to simply piss us off about her perceived paranoias.

The point here is, why are you wasting energy bashing a lame duck? Is it just vengeance, or do you really think that marginalizing Obama somehow makes the world better? Do you think about the future? Do you want your principles to be upheld? Then use your energy to fight for the person that can carry us forward into your version of a better society. We may disagree, but I think that you are simply wrong to bash people about their idiosyncrasies, without a principled argument.

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

Here's your sign:

 

[patriot66]

Really? Still harping on the teleprompter accusations? And then piling on the stuttering?

Look, Obama is one of the best speech givers of recent years. Whether he uses cue cards, teleprompters, or memorization, doesn't really matter. Palin reads inked crib notes on her hands. If she gave a good speech, I really could care less about how she prompts herself. But, rambling flight of ideas does not make her a good speaker, nor does she have a message worth paying attention to. Obama tries to lead us to a better society. Palin tries to simply piss us off about her perceived paranoias.

The point here is, why are you wasting energy bashing a lame duck? Is it just vengeance, or do you really think that marginalizing Obama somehow makes the world better? Do you think about the future? Do you want your principles to be upheld? Then use your energy to fight for the person that can carry us forward into your version of a better society. We may disagree, but I think that you are simply wrong to bash people about their idiosyncrasies, without a principled argument.

The man is a fool, and puppet, propped up by the one world order people, he has been the biggest Joke the Progressives have ever played on America.