On Memorial Day, Biden VA record of caring for veterans raises alarm

ptif219

Verified User
Here we go again. VA was messed up under Obama now it is messed up again under Biden. It seems Democrats do not like Vets


https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/campaigns/third-party-election-effect-2024



Early in the debt ceiling crisis, the Biden administration tried to scare veterans into believing Republicans might cut their benefits, which did not happen. But the administration’s own treatment of the nation’s warriors suffers from glaring failures ranging from lax security to benefits delayed by unwarranted tests.


The failures were laid bare in a series of reports and memos made public by the Department of Veterans Affairs's internal watchdog, the Office of Inspector General, shortly before Memorial Day and reviewed by Just the News.

“OIG staff have identified significant deficiencies," VA Inspector General Michael Missal wrote to Congress in a cover letter accompanying the agency’s latest semiannual oversight report.

“Our oversight efforts spotlighted in this report help illustrate how weaknesses in any of these areas of accountability can negatively affect veterans and can waste or misuse taxpayer dollars,” he also said.

You can read the report here:
Missal flagged numerous audits and investigations that uncovered problems affecting the health, safety and services of America’s veterans.

They included a recent management advisory that highlighted “concerns revealed across four prior oversight reports about [Veterans Benefits Administration] decision-making on claims-processing issues that adversely affected some beneficiaries.”

The unfixed problems flagged in prior years also included the continued delayed of veterans benefits because unwarranted exams are being requested, the reports show.

“Veterans are still being required to attend unwarranted medical re-examinations for disability benefits,” the semiannual report noted.
 
The Republicans wanted to cut vet money in this negotiation


Biden got them to heave that idea


Republicans are sooo stupid
 
Last edited:
The Republicans wanted to cut vet money in this negotiation
Biden got them to heave that idea
Republicans are sooo stupid

You do... No, you don't... Realize that the number of veterans in the US is declining markedly. The idea that the VA requires the same level of funding to deal with fewer and fewer veterans is stupid. As the number of people the agency serves declines, the funding should be reduced in proportion to allow for the same services for fewer customers. That makes sense.

rhq-6-1-12-g1.png
 
You do... No, you don't... Realize that the number of veterans in the US is declining markedly. The idea that the VA requires the same level of funding to deal with fewer and fewer veterans is stupid. As the number of people the agency serves declines, the funding should be reduced in proportion to allow for the same services for fewer customers. That makes sense.

So now it’s good to cut Vets funding?


So do you want all POWs to not be funded in particular you fucking evil bag O dicks?
 
https://www.militarytimes.com/opini...ould-slash-30-billion-from-veterans-spending/


Thirty million fewer healthcare visits. Fewer staff, increased claims backlog, longer wait times for benefits. Almost a $30 billion shortfall for veterans funding. That’s the uncertainty that awaits America’s veterans, should Congressional Republicans succeed in dramatically slashing federal spending as House Speaker Kevin McCarthy proposed on April 19.

Remember when Biden got your idiots in congress to stop insisting on trashing SS RIGHT ON TV
 
So now it’s good to cut Vets funding?
So do you want all POWs to not be funded in particular you fucking evil bag O dicks?

It is when there are fewer and fewer vets to serve. Or, are you saying that increasing funding per veteran is what you intend even if no new services or other things are offered? What you are arguing for is more bureaucrats and bureaucracy to handle fewer veterans as customers. That makes ZERO sense. Why grow government?
 
It is when there are fewer and fewer vets to serve. Or, are you saying that increasing funding per veteran is what you intend even if no new services or other things are offered? What you are arguing for is more bureaucrats and bureaucracy to handle fewer veterans as customers. That makes ZERO sense. Why grow government?

You want to cut Vets funding


Thanks for admitting it


Now go argue the the idiot con who started this thread shit bag
 
It is when there are fewer and fewer vets to serve. Or, are you saying that increasing funding per veteran is what you intend even if no new services or other things are offered? What you are arguing for is more bureaucrats and bureaucracy to handle fewer veterans as customers. That makes ZERO sense. Why grow government?

Inflation you stupid loser?
 
Back
Top