Polls show Trump is losing to Joe Biden. They said the same thing 4 years ago against

E

Earl

Well-known member
Polls show Trump is losing to Joe Biden. They said the same thing 4 years ago against Hillary Clinton
Ledyard King
Michael Collins
USA TODAY
WASHINGTON – Joe Biden can look at the polls and smile.

Cautiously.

“A double-digit advantage in numerous national surveys, solid leads in a number of key battlegrounds, and competitive showings in states Donald Trump carried handily in 2016 suggest the presumptive Democratic nominee is the favorite to win in November.

But the overwhelming majority of polls four years ago indicated Trump would lose as well. So why put much faith in the 2020 polls that show the former vice president consistently on top?

David Burgess of Kittery, Maine, said he stopped believing polls after the 2016 presidential election.

"They predicted Hillary Clinton would win, and she didn’t,” Burgess said while taking a stroll through downtown Portsmouth, New Hampshire, with his miniature schnauzer, Taavi. "Voters are like an iceberg. (With polls), you just see the tip of the iceberg. You don’t see the rest of the iceberg. You don’t know who they’re going to vote for...”
usatoday.com
 
Earl said:
If I am ever asked for whom I will vote,I will respond...Donald Duck.
Click to expand...


This has been explained to you multiple times and you still keep making stupid moronic drug added posts Clinton whooped Trump's ass by 3 million votes those are the facts go suck on a thistle
 
katzgar said:
This has been explained to you multiple times and you still keep making stupid moronic drug added posts Clinton whooped Trump's ass by 3 million votes those are the facts go suck on a thistle
Click to expand...

Five million illegals voted...President Trump won by two million votes.

Hillary was sent home to bake cookies and rid her home of old Bill’s bimbos.

This has been explained to you multiple times and you still keep making stupid moronic drug “addled” posts, cabron.
 
Earl said:
Five million illegals voted...President Trump won by two million votes.

Hillary was sent home to bake cookies and rid her home of old Bill’s bimbos.

This has been explained to you multiple times and you still keep making stupid moronic drug “addled” posts, cabron.
Click to expand...


You are literally the dumbest moron on the entire planet
 
More than three in five Americans now say that the U.S.' efforts to put the disease in its place is "going badly," according to a CBS News poll out Sunday. That pessimistic view is dragging on President Donald Trump's approval rating, as well, shows the poll that found only about two in five people think he's doing a "good job" handling the outbreak.
 
Earl said:
Polls show Trump is losing to Joe Biden. They said the same thing 4 years ago against Hillary Clinton
Ledyard King
Michael Collins
USA TODAY
WASHINGTON – Joe Biden can look at the polls and smile.

Cautiously.

“A double-digit advantage in numerous national surveys, solid leads in a number of key battlegrounds, and competitive showings in states Donald Trump carried handily in 2016 suggest the presumptive Democratic nominee is the favorite to win in November.

But the overwhelming majority of polls four years ago indicated Trump would lose as well. So why put much faith in the 2020 polls that show the former vice president consistently on top?

David Burgess of Kittery, Maine, said he stopped believing polls after the 2016 presidential election.

"They predicted Hillary Clinton would win, and she didn’t,” Burgess said while taking a stroll through downtown Portsmouth, New Hampshire, with his miniature schnauzer, Taavi. "Voters are like an iceberg. (With polls), you just see the tip of the iceberg. You don’t see the rest of the iceberg. You don’t know who they’re going to vote for...”
usatoday.com
Click to expand...

"earl" you got to stop living in the past, 2016 was nearly four years ago, in fact it was this very month four years ago that the Russians hacked the Democrat National Committee, bet you forgot about that one didn't you
 
archives said:
"earl" you got to stop living in the past, 2016 was nearly four years ago, in fact it was this very month four years ago that the Russians hacked the Democrat National Committee, bet you forgot about that one didn't you
Click to expand...
da Russians! :rofl2::rofl2::rofl2:

Sworn Testimony: Crowdstrike Had No Proof of Russian Hack of DNC
https://www.realclearinvestigations...d_no_proof_of_russian_hack_of_dnc_123596.html

Allegation that Russia stole Democratic Party emails from Hillary Clinton, John Podesta and others and then passed them to WikiLeaks helped trigger the FBI's probe into now debunked claims of a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia to steal the 2016 election.
The CrowdStrike admissions were released just two months after the Justice Department retreated from its its other central claim that Russia meddled in the 2016 election when it dropped charges against Russian troll farms it said had been trying to get Trump elected.

Asked for the date when alleged Russian hackers stole data from the DNC server, Henry testified that CrowdStrike did not in fact know if such a theft occurred at all: "We did not have concrete evidence that the data was exfiltrated [moved electronically] from the DNC, but we have indicators that it was exfiltrated," Henry said.

Henry reiterated his claim on multiple occasions:

"There’s not evidence that they were actually exfiltrated. There's circumstantial evidence but no evidence that they were actually exfiltrated."
Click to expand...
"There is circumstantial evidence that that data was exfiltrated off the network. … We didn't have a sensor in place that saw data leave. We said that the data left based on the circumstantial evidence. That was the conclusion that we made."
Click to expand...

"Sir, I was just trying to be factually accurate, that we didn't see the data leave, but we believe it left, based on what we saw."
Asked directly if he could "unequivocally say" whether "it was or was not exfiltrated out of DNC," Henry told the committee: "I can't say based on that."
Click to expand...

Henry’s 2017 testimony that there was no “concrete evidence” that the emails were stolen electronically suggests that Mueller may have been misleading in his 2019 final report.

The report stated that Russian intelligence "appears to have compressed and exfiltrated over 70 gigabytes of data" and agents "appear to have stolen thousands of emails and attachments" from Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and DNC servers, respectively. It also suggests that the DNC emails were transferred to a server in Illinois controlled by the Russian intelligence service GRU.
In addition to including the qualifier "appear," Mueller's source for the Illinois server claim is redacted. That leaves CrowdStrike, to date, as U.S. intelligence officials’ primary, publicly known source for its confident claims about Russian hacking.....
 
anatta said:
da Russians! :rofl2::rofl2::rofl2:

Sworn Testimony: Crowdstrike Had No Proof of Russian Hack of DNC
https://www.realclearinvestigations...d_no_proof_of_russian_hack_of_dnc_123596.html

Allegation that Russia stole Democratic Party emails from Hillary Clinton, John Podesta and others and then passed them to WikiLeaks helped trigger the FBI's probe into now debunked claims of a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia to steal the 2016 election.
The CrowdStrike admissions were released just two months after the Justice Department retreated from its its other central claim that Russia meddled in the 2016 election when it dropped charges against Russian troll farms it said had been trying to get Trump elected.

Asked for the date when alleged Russian hackers stole data from the DNC server, Henry testified that CrowdStrike did not in fact know if such a theft occurred at all: "We did not have concrete evidence that the data was exfiltrated [moved electronically] from the DNC, but we have indicators that it was exfiltrated," Henry said.

Henry reiterated his claim on multiple occasions:






Henry’s 2017 testimony that there was no “concrete evidence” that the emails were stolen electronically suggests that Mueller may have been misleading in his 2019 final report.

The report stated that Russian intelligence "appears to have compressed and exfiltrated over 70 gigabytes of data" and agents "appear to have stolen thousands of emails and attachments" from Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and DNC servers, respectively. It also suggests that the DNC emails were transferred to a server in Illinois controlled by the Russian intelligence service GRU.
In addition to including the qualifier "appear," Mueller's source for the Illinois server claim is redacted. That leaves CrowdStrike, to date, as U.S. intelligence officials’ primary, publicly known source for its confident claims about Russian hacking.....
Click to expand...

Not quite, not only did CrowdStrike have evidence, but also that evidence was supported by the U.S. Intelligence community and independent Congressional reports (https://www.crowdstrike.com/blog/bears-midst-intrusion-democratic-national-committee/)
 
You rightys have it all figured out. There is no reason to bother voting. It is just a left-wing lie that Biden is anywhere near Trump.
Stone was the go-between between Russian hackers and the Trump campaign. He was subverting the American election system for Trump. He was connected to Assange and gusifer, among others.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top