Postage Stamps Honoring The Dirty Old Communist

Flanders

Verified User
Communist Cuba praised socialist Bernie Sanders, the front-runner in the race for the Democratic nomination for president, for his recent praise of the communist nation.


February 27th, 2020
Communist Cuba Praises Bernie Sanders On Front Page Of State-Run Newspaper
By Ryan Saavedra

https://www.dailywire.com/news/comm...-sanders-on-front-page-of-state-run-newspaper

I expect Cuba to reward the Dirty Old Commie by issuing postage stamps in his honor. The first one would picture Sanders wearing a mustache and a goatee:



J2kYiKN.jpg

https://www.stampboards.com/images/miscr/J2kYiKN.jpg


The second stamp would show him as:





Stamp collectors can trade 1,000 Sanders stamps for one Ayn Rand stamp:

 
Communist Cuba praised socialist Bernie Sanders, the front-runner in the race for the Democratic nomination for president, for his recent praise of the communist nation.

I expect Cuba to reward the Dirty Old Commie by issuing postage stamps in his honor. The first one would picture Sanders wearing a mustache and a goatee
You make a lot of posts complaining about socialism and posturing as a knowledgeable person on communism of the Soviet variety.

There is not a snowball's chance in hell you could actually articulate what the original soviets actually were, without resorting to frantically Googling.

I guarantee you would not know, without googling, who Aleksandr Kerensky was, what the difference between Boksheviks, Mensheviks, and the Socialist Revolutionary Party is, what the White movement was, what the distinctions between Karl Marx and Vladimir Lenin was, what the distinctions between the February and October Revolution were, what the origin and nature of the Russian civil war was, who Leon Trotsky was, what Article 58 of the penal code was and how Stalin used it, nor could they speak intelligently or at depth about the history of the Siberian labour camps and the Gulag, and there are almost no rightwing message board posters who have actually read Gulag Archipelago from front to back cover .

Yes, what you think you know about the USSR originates from American rightwing talk radio or the right wing media.

I try to keep my mouth shut on topics I am either ignorant of, or only have superficial knowledge of.

What you need to do is keep your mouth shut concerning comnunism, socialism, the Soviet Union, and Marxism. Because it is transparently obvious your knowledge of these topics is barely even superficial, based on talk radio slogans, and utterly dependent on caricature.
 
You make a lot of posts complaining about socialism and posturing as a knowledgeable person on communism of the Soviet variety.

There is not a snowball's chance in hell you could actually articulate what the original soviets actually were, without resorting to frantically Googling.

I guarantee you would not know, without googling, who Aleksandr Kerensky was, what the difference between Boksheviks, Mensheviks, and the Socialist Revolutionary Party is, what the White movement was, what the distinctions between Karl Marx and Vladimir Lenin was, what the distinctions between the February and October Revolution were, what the origin and nature of the Russian civil war was, who Leon Trotsky was, what Article 58 of the penal code was and how Stalin used it, nor could they speak intelligently or at depth about the history of the Siberian labour camps and the Gulag, and there are almost no rightwing message board posters who have actually read Gulag Archipelago from front to back cover .

Yes, what you think you know about the USSR originates from American rightwing talk radio or the right wing media.

I try to keep my mouth shut on topics I am either ignorant of, or only have superficial knowledge of.

What you need to do is keep your mouth shut concerning comnunism, socialism, the Soviet Union, and Marxism. Because it is transparently obvious your knowledge of these topics is barely even superficial, based on talk radio slogans, and utterly dependent on caricature.

^^^^^Example of someone that had to Google frantically to make this post.
 
^^^^^Example of someone that had to Google frantically to make this post.
You sound impressed and automatically assume it could thus only have come from copying and pasting from Google sources.


I did not use Google at all, I expressed my own ideas, and I used my own words.

That is what a good education, and a lifelong interest in history gets one.


It stands in sharp relief to the repetitive, boring, poorly written, tepid racist posts you are limited by both cognition and talent to writing.
 
So you claim. Prove it, boy.

No assumptions were made. You have yet to show any level of intelligence and education.
 
You make a lot of posts complaining about socialism and posturing as a knowledgeable person on communism of the Soviet variety.

There is not a snowball's chance in hell you could actually articulate what the original soviets actually were, without resorting to frantically Googling.

I guarantee you would not know, without googling, who Aleksandr Kerensky was, what the difference between Boksheviks, Mensheviks, and the Socialist Revolutionary Party is, what the White movement was, what the distinctions between Karl Marx and Vladimir Lenin was, what the distinctions between the February and October Revolution were, what the origin and nature of the Russian civil war was, who Leon Trotsky was, what Article 58 of the penal code was and how Stalin used it, nor could they speak intelligently or at depth about the history of the Siberian labour camps and the Gulag, and there are almost no rightwing message board posters who have actually read Gulag Archipelago from front to back cover .

Yes, what you think you know about the USSR originates from American rightwing talk radio or the right wing media.

I try to keep my mouth shut on topics I am either ignorant of, or only have superficial knowledge of.

What you need to do is keep your mouth shut concerning comnunism, socialism, the Soviet Union, and Marxism. Because it is transparently obvious your knowledge of these topics is barely even superficial, based on talk radio slogans, and utterly dependent on caricature.

Pompous preening prick pontificating as usual.
 
Back
Top