http://www.clintonfoundation.org/ne...mes-of-all-contributors-on-foundation-website
Posted without comment.
Posted without comment.
Yes Watermark please try to downplay the signficance of this.
i guess $25 million probably buys a lot of loyalty for saudi among the clintons, now the obamas
You don't think some of these might not influence her decisions as SoS even the slightest bit?
Friends of Saudi Arabia (lol?)
State of Kuwait
State of Qatar
Taiwan Economic and Cultural Office
The Sultanate of Oman
where are the saudis in that category?
did you bother to actually read clinton's site? i must assume no, for you would see the saudis in the second category. i have no doubt that the saudis play a far larger role, but the fact they are playing that big of a role in an EX-president's affairs, makes a sham argument the libs present about bush being in bed with the saudis. your boy hero, sex-alot, is in their payroll too.
don't you hate it when you bitch about the repubs doing something, only to find out the dems are doing the same....stop being a partisan hack and see the truth for what it is.
In post 2 you said that the saudis were in the biggest category. In post 3, I gave you the link to the Clinton website that clearly shows that they are not. I would suggest that it is YOU who have failed tol read the site... either that or your language is imprecise in post #2. And Clinton is far from my hero.
i misread a different article that said the saudis gave $41 million to clinton, i reread the article and it said saudis, combined, with other governments gave a total of 41 million dollars, in skimming it, i read only saudis.
i never claimed clinton site said the saudis were the biggest donor and you suggesting i did is wholly inaccurate and not truthful.