Romney Backs Bankruptcy Over Bailout

klaatu

Fusionist
Im thinking Romney is right on this one ... Pubs messed up not backing this guy.

Emissions * November 20, 2008 * by Cosmo Catalano
Romney Backs Bankruptcy Over Bailout

Former presidential candidate Mitt Romney, who stumped for the revival of the American auto industry just a few months ago, said yesterday in The New York Times that Detroit should not receive a federal bailout.

Romney, a skilled businessman who rose to fame at Bain & Co. consulting, before later engineering a seemingly miraculous turnaround for the Salt Lake City Olympics, has unique insight on the American auto industry. Romney's father George was the CEO of AMC from 1954 to 1962, and became an early advocate for the production and marketing of compact, efficient cars.

Though many sustainability-focused organizations are willing to accept a bailout in exchange for improved fleet economy and a changing of the guard at the executive level, Romney and others including Jack Welch have argued that an infusion of federal cash will only allow GM to further put off the changes it needs to make to be competitive in today's market.

Congress seems disinclined, as they all but told the auto industry yesterdat that a bill to appropriate more loans likely wouldn't happen this year. While bankruptcy is viewed as the end of the road by many, the court-protected reorganization it provides has seen organizations and people from airlines to Donald Trump emerge as more efficient, viable entities. While some counter that no one wants to buy a car from a bankrupt company, I think there's plenty of evidence that if a vehicle provides the features buyers want, it's going to sell.
 
If you think about it... many major companies recover nicely after bankruptcy. Airlines, Major retailers ... the list goes on and on.
 
Yeah and the government can take over the pension plan. There will still be bailout apsects in bankruptcy.
 
Im thinking Romney is right on this one ... Pubs messed up not backing this guy.

Emissions * November 20, 2008 * by Cosmo Catalano
Romney Backs Bankruptcy Over Bailout

Former presidential candidate Mitt Romney, who stumped for the revival of the American auto industry just a few months ago, said yesterday in The New York Times that Detroit should not receive a federal bailout.

Romney, a skilled businessman who rose to fame at Bain & Co. consulting, before later engineering a seemingly miraculous turnaround for the Salt Lake City Olympics, has unique insight on the American auto industry. Romney's father George was the CEO of AMC from 1954 to 1962, and became an early advocate for the production and marketing of compact, efficient cars.

Though many sustainability-focused organizations are willing to accept a bailout in exchange for improved fleet economy and a changing of the guard at the executive level, Romney and others including Jack Welch have argued that an infusion of federal cash will only allow GM to further put off the changes it needs to make to be competitive in today's market.

Congress seems disinclined, as they all but told the auto industry yesterdat that a bill to appropriate more loans likely wouldn't happen this year. While bankruptcy is viewed as the end of the road by many, the court-protected reorganization it provides has seen organizations and people from airlines to Donald Trump emerge as more efficient, viable entities. While some counter that no one wants to buy a car from a bankrupt company, I think there's plenty of evidence that if a vehicle provides the features buyers want, it's going to sell.



As I said in the first thread on this subject, Romney isn't advocating for leaving the automakers on their own. Instead, he's advocating a "managed bankruptcy" and, although the precise parameters are unclear, he seems to support federal DIP financing to ensure that the automakers can make it through a Chapter 11 without liquidating. I think he's right in that regard. That's the least bad option.
 
Any option that resulted in the automakers laying off people and reducing production massively would be a disaster for the economy and send ripples throughout.
 
if not bankruptcy, then they need a business plan detailing how they would use the loan

one problem though, do we want a foreign nation (say china or russia) to buy the u s of a's auto manufacturing capability

or just keep that part that builds military hardware in u s of a hands

while the money is being called a 'bailout', it is a loan

but what good is a loan that the auto makers would default on come next april or may
 
if not bankruptcy, then they need a business plan detailing how they would use the loan

one problem though, do we want a foreign nation (say china or russia) to buy the u s of a's auto manufacturing capability

or just keep that part that builds military hardware in u s of a hands

while the money is being called a 'bailout', it is a loan

but what good is a loan that the auto makers would default on come next april or may
Yeah, because when the people who are in the business fail at it, everybody in Congress becomes a business expert with the knowledge and skills necessary to see how well such a plan would work...

I like the managed bankruptcy option. It is the best and least expensive way to save that industry here in the US.
 
There aren't many things I enjoy more than a good game of craps w/ America's economic future...
Yeah, because the bailout isn't a game of craps with America's future, or a myriad of choices we have made lately...

Unfortunately the future isn't predetermined and even your crystal ball doesn't have a more accurate antenna than anybody else's.
 
Back
Top