The inevitable happened when the Party of Liars realized they were left with one choice —— blame everyone for the things they are guilty of. I am not certain when the liars saw their only option, but the option was there in 1971 in Saul Alinsky’s Rule for Radicals.
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...n-Of-The-Party-Of-Liars&p=2797672#post2797672
Alinsky now has a 48 year track record of the killing, the hatred, and the destruction his vicious mind set in motion:
Ever since the election of Donald Trump, there has been a concerted effort to not only to try to undermine President Trump, but to undermine the U.S. Constitution itself. Shutting down speakers on campus, rallying to ban or control guns, disseminating “fake news” as fact, and advancing the tactic of the “politics of personal destruction” are all part of the radical Alinsky agenda.
.
Stigmatizing opponents as “racists”, “sexists”, “homophobes”, and “Islamophobes”
The Alinskyites, mainly liberal Democrats and Progressives, use the tactics as listed in his famous book called, “Rules for Radicals”. These tactics include the stigmatizing opponents as “racists”, “sexists”, “homophobes”, and “Islamophobes”. The radicals often pretend to be what they are not.
The acolytes of Alinsky’s rules lie to their opponents (fake news) and disarm them pretending to be a moderate and mainstream liberal. The Alynskyites attempt to advance their radical goals by camouflaging them by changing their style to appear to be working within the system (the U.S. Constitution).
The radicals will most always champion following the Constitution to get your vote, but when they become the government it will be a different story.
The radicals are taught the art of miscommunication. They are trying to impose socialism (Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren etc.) on a country whose forefathers understood that socialism destroys freedom, so they avoid the use of the word socialism and in its place they sell it as “Progressive”, “Economic Democracy”, and “Social Justice”. In other words, they will work within the system (the Constitution) until they can accumulate enough power to destroy it.
The radicals (Alinskyites) will try to sell the people on change by using terms and phrases like “Audacity of Hope”, “Yes, We Can” (Obama’s terms). They do this selling of radical change by proposing “moderate” changes to the Constitution and laws which will open the door to more radical changes in the future (the old foot in the door syndrome).
The radicals, make no mistake about it, are at “war”, especially against the 1st and 2nd Amendments to the Constitution
The radicals, make no mistake about it, are at “war”, especially against the 1st and 2nd Amendments to the Constitution. Shutting off “free speech” and religion (the 1st Amendment) and the control or banning of firearms (the 2nd Amendment) are at the forefront of their constitutional attacks. Radicals perceive opponents of their causes as enemies on a battlefield, and they set about to destroy them by demonizing and discrediting them (that’s what the whole Trump “resistance” movement is all about).
So, in the battle between the United States Constitution vs, Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals”, we must not let our guard down by believing the arguments the radicals propose, because it is all a charade by them to impose their will on an unsuspecting electorate who, these elitists, feel are a bunch of naive “hayseed” morons who voted for
Donald Trump. President Trump, with all his personal “warts” and bombast, is the person to support in this quest for upholding the Constitution against the attacks by the radical Alynskyites. We do not want to become the United States of Europe.
U.S. Constitution vs. Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals
By Chuck Lehmann
January 3, 2019
https://canadafreepress.com/article/u.s.-constitution-vs.-alinskys-rules-for-radicals
There is no justification for young Alinsky acolytes to claim those rules (commandments) will make the U.S. a better country. Indeed, no other country practices Alinsky’s teachings as religiously as they are followed in this country. (I am not sure Alinshy is known anywhere except here.)
Hillary Clinton is Alinsky’s high priest, and his most successful follower, yet the public is unaware of the part she played in spreading Socialism’s deadliest sect in this country —— more deadly than India’s Thuggees:
Thuggees, a Sanskrit word meaning concealment, were an organized gang of professional assassins – sometimes described as the world's first mafia – who operated from the 13th to the 19th centuries in India. Members of the fanatical religious group, who were infamous for their ritualistic assassinations carried out in the name of the Hindu Goddess Kali, were known as Thugs, a word that passed into common English during the British occupation of India.
2 October, 2014 - 13:52
APRIL HOLLOWAY
Thuggees – the Cult Assassins of India
https://www.ancient-origins.net/myths-legends-asia/thuggees-cult-assassins-india-002145
Hillary Clinton was always obvious. She was as dumb in collage as she is today. I always wondered if Hillary’s Wellesley’s sisters now realize that their most famous alumna is a nasty frustrated woman full of rage who worshiped and championed two of the most politically filthy men in history —— Karl Marx and Saul Alinski?
Her senior thesis is a tough read but it is all there:
https://www.hillaryclintonquarterly.com/documents/HillaryClintonThesis.pdf
On the plus side Hillary Rodam Clinton became a figure of ridicule as she aged rather than being seen as a much-loved former president. That judgement is surely the unkindest cut of all.
On the negative side the evil Hillary Clinton did will live on long after her bones are interred with nary a good deed to commend her.
