SEC admitts lack of oversight help create the problem

evince

Truthmatters
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/27/b...gin&adxnnlx=1223132216-Us7H/yjcPNvZ6J2jLCo+qw



S.E.C. Concedes Oversight Flaws Fueled Collapse
Sign In to E-Mail or Save This



By STEPHEN LABATON
Published: September 26, 2008
WASHINGTON — The chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, a longtime proponent of deregulation, acknowledged on Friday that failures in a voluntary supervision program for Wall Street’s largest investment banks had contributed to the global financial crisis, and he abruptly shut the program down.

The S.E.C.’s oversight responsibilities will largely shift to the Federal Reserve, though the commission will continue to oversee the brokerage units of investment banks.

Also Friday, the S.E.C.’s inspector general released a report strongly criticizing the agency’s performance in monitoring Bear Stearns before it collapsed in March. Christopher Cox, the commission chairman, said he agreed that the oversight program was “fundamentally flawed from the beginning.”

“The last six months have made it abundantly clear that voluntary regulation does not work,” he said in a statement. The program “was fundamentally flawed from the beginning, because investment banks could opt in or out of supervision voluntarily. The fact that investment bank holding companies could withdraw from this voluntary supervision at their discretion diminished the perceived mandate” of the program, and “weakened its effectiveness,” he added.
 
uhhhh it would work if you let them fucking fail! They might not pull the same shit again. But now that you bailed them out, what do you think they'll do next time?
 
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/27/b...gin&adxnnlx=1223132216-Us7H/yjcPNvZ6J2jLCo+qw



S.E.C. Concedes Oversight Flaws Fueled Collapse
Sign In to E-Mail or Save This



By STEPHEN LABATON
Published: September 26, 2008
WASHINGTON — The chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, a longtime proponent of deregulation, acknowledged on Friday that failures in a voluntary supervision program for Wall Street’s largest investment banks had contributed to the global financial crisis, and he abruptly shut the program down.

The S.E.C.’s oversight responsibilities will largely shift to the Federal Reserve, though the commission will continue to oversee the brokerage units of investment banks.

Also Friday, the S.E.C.’s inspector general released a report strongly criticizing the agency’s performance in monitoring Bear Stearns before it collapsed in March. Christopher Cox, the commission chairman, said he agreed that the oversight program was “fundamentally flawed from the beginning.”

“The last six months have made it abundantly clear that voluntary regulation does not work,” he said in a statement. The program “was fundamentally flawed from the beginning, because investment banks could opt in or out of supervision voluntarily. The fact that investment bank holding companies could withdraw from this voluntary supervision at their discretion diminished the perceived mandate” of the program, and “weakened its effectiveness,” he added.

According to an article by Kathleen Day in the Oct. 8, 2003, Washington Post, Frank opposed giving the Bush administration the right to approve or disapprove business activities that “could pose risk to the taxpayers.” He told the Post he worried the Treasury Department “would sacrifice activities that are good for consumers in the name of lowering the companies’ market risks.”

Just a month before, Frank had aggressively thwarted reform efforts by the Bush administration. He told The New York Times on Sept. 11, 2003, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s problems were “exaggerated,” a gross miscalculation some five years later with costs estimated to be in the hundreds of billions.

It would have been different is Barney Fag would have listened to Bush in 2003....
 
uhhhh it would work if you let them fucking fail! They might not pull the same shit again. But now that you bailed them out, what do you think they'll do next time?


In 20 years the "they" you are talking about will be dead and a whole new "they" will be in there place to make the same damn mistakes again.
 
So if I understand that correctly the voluntary program was to cover gaps in statutes when no gaps existed ?
 
Back
Top