Senator O'Dreamy's Magical Media Tour

The Bare Knuckled Pundit

Grand Inquisitor
As the Obama Magical Media World Tour and Intercontinental Lovefest winds its way thru the Middle East and prepares for a whirlwind European leg, a number of questions come to mind that deserve serious consideration.

- How appropriate is it to use active duty military personnel in what is still classified as a combat environment as campaign props?

- Why can’t Senator Obama acknowledge the success of the Surge in creating an environment that allows for serious discussion of major troop withdrawals from Iraq?

- As president, would Senator Obama be as tolerant of a presidential candidate interjecting themselves into the national security and foreign policy decision-making process as the Bush administration has of his own foray into these crucial policy areas on his current trip?

- As president, will Senator Obama be willing to host foreign political figures for what is primarily a campaign photo op as kings, prime ministers and presidents have been willing to do for him?

- With the anchors of the old guard Big Three evening newscasts following Obama on his trek like fawning groupies, can they maintain any serious credibility or the slightest impression of objectivity?

- How appropriate is it to post campaign banners at the most sacred site in Judaism; the Western Wall in the Old City of Jerusalem? Would the Vatican or the Great Mosque in Mecca be similarly appropriate locales in the eyes of the Obama campaign?

- While the first half of his tour has provided his campaign with ample video footage and photos of the Senator being the center of attention in exotic locales among foreign dignitaries and US military personnel, how will the images of adoring European throngs play in Middle America where Obama already has a problem with an elitist image?

The intentions of the Obama campaign are transparent. They seek to create the impression of gravitas and a command of military and foreign affairs. This is fair enough and standard when a candidate has such a meager resume and limited experience as Senator Obama. Look for him to further bolster his gravitas and policy bona fides with his vice presidential pick.

Furthermore, enunciating the principals and proposals one will pursue once in office is a fundamental part of political campaigns. Voters should have a clear understanding of the positions of those who seek public office; particularly the highest office in the land.

However, to travel abroad and engage in what appears to be a series of combination campaign photo-ops and long term negotiation sessions borders dangerously on hubris, arrogance and irresponsibility. This says nothing of the flagrant politization of the holy ground of one the world's major monotheistic religions.

Though lost in the heady abandon and narrow focus of a presidential campaign, perhaps the Obama team should take a step back, if for only a brief moment. Beyond the cherished images and footage, serious consideration must be given to the future impact on politics and policy development by the Senator’s trip.

Not only is the old adage that politics stops at the water's edge forever shattered, but presidential campaigns have now become global events. What does it say about the state of our electorate when our presidential candidates seek thousands of foreign supporters as the backdrop for their campaign and media events? Is the good Senator from Illinois running for President of the United States or Secretary General of the United Nations?

In addition to this, the media must engage in intense soul-searching regarding its clear lack of objectivity in its coverage of the two candidates. While the Big Three anchors follow in Obama’s wake like love-struck teens, a similar tour of South America by McCain barely merited mention.

As McCain’s latest campaign ad clearly demonstrates, there is significant bias bordering on blatant pandering towards the Obama campaign. If it hopes to regain it’s credibility it must objectively cover both candidates and cease towing the Obama party line. Given its recent actions there is little surprise its reputation has descended to little more than that of a well-funded and glossy partisan blogger.

Watch closely as the doe-eyed sophomores pass notes to the candidate between tour stops, faithful readers. Stay tuned for further updates as developments warrant and Senator O’Dreamy mesmerizes the media with his pearls of wisdom and superhuman charm.
 
"How appropriate is it to use active duty military personnel in what is still classified as a combat environment as campaign props? "

I think it is good that he is visiting the troops and getting a first hand feel for what is going on over in Iraq and Afghanistan. I did not see his involvement with the troops as using them as props.

" Why can’t Senator Obama acknowledge the success of the Surge in creating an environment that allows for serious discussion of major troop withdrawals from Iraq?"

Because politicians running for office don't tend to admit their mistakes. Obama is simply proving he is more of the same. Very similar to Bush in that regards.

"As president, would Senator Obama be as tolerant of a presidential candidate interjecting themselves into the national security and foreign policy decision-making process as the Bush administration has of his own foray into these crucial policy areas on his current trip?"

I think if it were in the same manner (at the end of a term) then yes, he would be as tolerant as it is expected from a potential opponent (or if at the end of the second term... either parties nominee)

"As president, will Senator Obama be willing to host foreign political figures for what is primarily a campaign photo op as kings, prime ministers and presidents have been willing to do for him?"

I would say of course he would. Every President does this.

"With the anchors of the old guard Big Three evening newscasts following Obama on his trek like fawning groupies, can they maintain any serious credibility or the slightest impression of objectivity?"

No. In my opinion they have lost all credibility. The last time McCain went to Iraq/Afghanistan we saw nothing like this circus of lapdogs following the messiah around. The blatant bias is pathetic and a disservice to the voters of this country.

"How appropriate is it to post campaign banners at the most sacred site in Judaism; the Western Wall in the Old City of Jerusalem? Would the Vatican or the Great Mosque in Mecca be similarly appropriate locales in the eyes of the Obama campaign?"

Personally, I do not think the candidates should be posting their crap anywhere outside the US.... whether it be a holy site or not.

"While the first half of his tour has provided his campaign with ample video footage and photos of the Senator being the center of attention in exotic locales among foreign dignitaries and US military personnel, how will the images of adoring European throngs play in Middle America where Obama already has a problem with an elitist image?"

I don't think it will change too many opinions. Most have already decided on whether or not they choose to believe he is an elitist. This will not help improve that perception, but I do not think it will further it all that much.
 
As the Obama Magical Media World Tour and Intercontinental Lovefest winds its way thru the Middle East and prepares for a whirlwind European leg, a number of questions come to mind that deserve serious consideration.

- How appropriate is it to use active duty military personnel in what is still classified as a combat environment as campaign props?

- Why can’t Senator Obama acknowledge the success of the Surge in creating an environment that allows for serious discussion of major troop withdrawals from Iraq?

- As president, would Senator Obama be as tolerant of a presidential candidate interjecting themselves into the national security and foreign policy decision-making process as the Bush administration has of his own foray into these crucial policy areas on his current trip?

- As president, will Senator Obama be willing to host foreign political figures for what is primarily a campaign photo op as kings, prime ministers and presidents have been willing to do for him?

- With the anchors of the old guard Big Three evening newscasts following Obama on his trek like fawning groupies, can they maintain any serious credibility or the slightest impression of objectivity?

- How appropriate is it to post campaign banners at the most sacred site in Judaism; the Western Wall in the Old City of Jerusalem? Would the Vatican or the Great Mosque in Mecca be similarly appropriate locales in the eyes of the Obama campaign?

- While the first half of his tour has provided his campaign with ample video footage and photos of the Senator being the center of attention in exotic locales among foreign dignitaries and US military personnel, how will the images of adoring European throngs play in Middle America where Obama already has a problem with an elitist image?

The intentions of the Obama campaign are transparent. They seek to create the impression of gravitas and a command of military and foreign affairs. This is fair enough and standard when a candidate has such a meager resume and limited experience as Senator Obama. Look for him to further bolster his gravitas and policy bona fides with his vice presidential pick.

Furthermore, enunciating the principals and proposals one will pursue once in office is a fundamental part of political campaigns. Voters should have a clear understanding of the positions of those who seek public office; particularly the highest office in the land.

However, to travel abroad and engage in what appears to be a series of combination campaign photo-ops and long term negotiation sessions borders dangerously on hubris, arrogance and irresponsibility. This says nothing of the flagrant politization of the holy ground of one the world's major monotheistic religions.

Though lost in the heady abandon and narrow focus of a presidential campaign, perhaps the Obama team should take a step back, if for only a brief moment. Beyond the cherished images and footage, serious consideration must be given to the future impact on politics and policy development by the Senator’s trip.

Not only is the old adage that politics stops at the water's edge forever shattered, but presidential campaigns have now become global events. What does it say about the state of our electorate when our presidential candidates seek thousands of foreign supporters as the backdrop for their campaign and media events? Is the good Senator from Illinois running for President of the United States or Secretary General of the United Nations?

In addition to this, the media must engage in intense soul-searching regarding its clear lack of objectivity in its coverage of the two candidates. While the Big Three anchors follow in Obama’s wake like love-struck teens, a similar tour of South America by McCain barely merited mention.

As McCain’s latest campaign ad clearly demonstrates, there is significant bias bordering on blatant pandering towards the Obama campaign. If it hopes to regain it’s credibility it must objectively cover both candidates and cease towing the Obama party line. Given its recent actions there is little surprise its reputation has descended to little more than that of a well-funded and glossy partisan blogger.

Watch closely as the doe-eyed sophomores pass notes to the candidate between tour stops, faithful readers. Stay tuned for further updates as developments warrant and Senator O’Dreamy mesmerizes the media with his pearls of wisdom and superhuman charm.



Whaaaaaambulance. McCain challenged Obama to take a trip to Iraq. He did and looks unmistakably presidential. Now McCain is upset. Fuck him.

Furthermore, McCain, who referred to the media as his "base" and who routinely gets fawning coverage (and selective editing to make him look like he knows what he's talking about when he clearly doesn't), not to mention sprinkled donuts and coffee just the way he likes it from the traveling press corps, is nothing short of hilarious.
 
Whaaaaaambulance. McCain challenged Obama to take a trip to Iraq. He did and looks unmistakably presidential. Now McCain is upset. Fuck him.

Furthermore, McCain, who referred to the media as his "base" and who routinely gets fawning coverage (and selective editing to make him look like he knows what he's talking about when he clearly doesn't), not to mention sprinkled donuts and coffee just the way he likes it from the traveling press corps, is nothing short of hilarious.
I was going to say just these two things. McCain practically hit Obama across the face with his glove to get him to go to Iraq, as an addition he suggested that they do it together. He got his first wish but not his second. toughy shit there.

Now, the media did the same thing in for McCain, practically being the mouthpeice for his maverickness. Sorry he just doesn't play as well on the tv as Obama
 
I was going to say just these two things. McCain practically hit Obama across the face with his glove to get him to go to Iraq, as an addition he suggested that they do it together. He got his first wish but not his second. toughy shit there.

Now, the media did the same thing in for McCain, practically being the mouthpeice for his maverickness. Sorry he just doesn't play as well on the tv as Obama

Obama is definitely more telegenic than McCain, much like Kennedy was more so than Nixon. He's also a far better orator when presenting prepared remarks. In sharp contrast, McCain is uncomfortable with speeches and does strikingly better in open formats.

But he stumbled and fumbled around with his off-the-cuff responses to the media this week. Highly surprising as he is probably one of the better prepped candidates of our time.
 
Obama is definitely more telegenic than McCain, much like Kennedy was more so than Nixon. He's also a far better orator when presenting prepared remarks. In sharp contrast, McCain is uncomfortable with speeches and does strikingly better in open formats.

But he stumbled and fumbled around with his off-the-cuff responses to the media this week. Highly surprising as he is probably one of the better prepped candidates of our time.


Who is "he?"
 
Why can’t Senator Obama acknowledge the success of the Surge in creating an environment that allows for serious discussion of major troop withdrawals from Iraq?

Because if he did it would be complimenting the Republican president?

Why do you ask question you already know the answer to?
 
How appropriate is it to post campaign banners at the most sacred site in Judaism; the Western Wall in the Old City of Jerusalem? Would the Vatican or the Great Mosque in Mecca be similarly appropriate locales in the eyes of the Obama campaign?

However appropriate it was to the Jews who allowed him to do it.
 
Not only is the old adage that politics stops at the water's edge forever shattered, but presidential campaigns have now become global events. What does it say about the state of our electorate when our presidential candidates seek thousands of foreign supporters as the backdrop for their campaign and media events?

Because it will get him more votes from Jews. Again, why do you ask questions you know the answer to?
 
Obama has the election locked up and the
Repigs know it

Indeed, much like everyone knew on the morning of Labor Day, 1988, when Michael "Tank" Dukakis was leading George H. Bush by 12 points that he had that election "locked up".

Funny, I don't recall there ever being a President Dukakis, though.

While I personally believe it's Obama's to loose, there's an eternity between now and November 4th.

Kind of reminds me of the Michigan-Appy State game last year. On paper, Michigan was supposed to have a cake walk. The bookies didn't even bat an eye on the line. But you know what, that's why they go ahead and actually play the game. Because you never know what just might happen.
 
Indeed, much like everyone knew on the morning of Labor Day, 1988, when Michael "Tank" Dukakis was leading George H. Bush by 12 points that he had that election "locked up".

Funny, I don't recall there ever being a President Dukakis, though.

While I personally believe it's Obama's to loose, there's an eternity between now and November 4th.

Kind of reminds me of the Michigan-Appy State game last year. On paper, Michigan was supposed to have a cake walk. The bookies didn't even bat an eye on the line. But you know what, that's why they go ahead and actually play the game. Because you never know what just might happen.

Yep.
 
Back
Top