"Substance" ? Hillary's Is All WRONG

protectionist

Verified User
Trump-bashers like to ludicrously claim that Trump has no policy or "substance", Actually Trump has plenty of substance. And so does Hillary. Problem with Hillary's "substance" is >> it's all the WRONG stuff >>>

1. Approval of Mexican & Chinese imperialism, raiding America's economy.
2. Approval of Amnesty for illegal aliens. (anything less than deportation is amnesty)
3. Approval of Sanctuary Cities.
4. Approval of Birthright Citizenship.
5. Approval of gun-free zones.
6. Banning guns - opposition to nationwide CCW.
7. Approval of Muslim Brotherhood (has Huma Abedin-close aide)
8. Approval of Muslim immigration (including the ISIS trojan horse)
9. Approval of racist Affirmative Action
10. Damaged national security by her unsecured email server.
11. Allowed 4 men to die in Benghazi
12. Killed 50 people in the Clinton Body Count
13. Scammed millions of good-hearted people out of millions$ in her phony "Foundation"
14. Judicial watch conflict of interest report on the Clinton "Foundation"
15. Numerous scandals (Filegate, Travelgate, Whitewater, Speaking fees, etc)
16. Corporate tax increase
17. Excessive business regulation
18. Long history of support for Free Trade (NAFTA, Trilateral Commission, Council on Foreign Relations, TPP, etc)
19. BOUGHT by Wall St. and other special interests (over $200 Million)
20. Atrocious pro-Muslim Brotherhood record in the State Dept.

And TRUMP'S substance ? Exactly the opposite of these trashy things. :D
 
Trump-bashers like to ludicrously claim that Trump has no policy or "substance", Actually Trump has plenty of substance.

.....And, all ya' gotta do is pull-his-finger.....


Donald-Trump-Finger_2_e6hfcs.jpg

crap-emoticon.gif




Brought to you by those fine folks at......

trumplax.jpg
 
Notice how the Hillary loons are all flocking in here to dispute the OP. Of course not. They can't dispute it. That horrible record she has run up, is there for all to see. She can't hide it, and they can't defend it. Only mysterious question remaining, is why do these strange people support this trashbag ?

thinking.gif
 
Notice how the Hillary loons are all flocking in here to dispute the OP.

Yeah.....we really need another rich-punk Chickenhawk.....starting another War.....while we're still fighting the one, the last rich-punk Chickenhawk started!!

If more o' you (functionally-illiterate) Teabaggers, were a little-more familiar with how we got, where we are, now.....you might be a little-less anxious to put a whole, goddamned FAMILY of rich-punk Chickenhawks into the Whitehouse!!!


http://www.chron.com/news/houston-t...ays-Bush-talked-about-war-in-1999-1975031.php
*
http://downingstreetmemo.com/
*
http://www.angelfire.com/ca3/jphuck/Book10Ch.2.html
 
Last edited:
Just any ONE of the 20 items in the OP, is reason enough to disqualify Hillary as a presidential candidate. geez.gif
 
Last edited:
Yeah.....we really need another rich-punk Chickenhawk.....starting another War.....while we're still fighting the one, the last rich-punk Chickenhawk started!!

If more o' you (functionally-illiterate) Teabaggers, were a little-more familiar with how we got, where we are, now.....you might be a little-less anxious to put a whole, goddamned FAMILY of rich-punk Chickenhawks into the Whitehouse!!!

You obviously have no clue as to the gravity of ISIS and US National Security IN 2016.
 
Just any ONE of the 20 items in the OP, is reason enough to disqualify Hillary as a presidential candidate.

I looked-and-looked for that ONE.....that had an actual-reference.....but, it must have disappeared.
wanking.gif


I DO find references, to Judicial Watch, as some o' the most-amusing, though!!!
crying.gif




http://www.americanpolitics.com/061198Klayman.html

*
http://conwebwatch.tripod.com/outthere/otenemies.html

*
http://www.rightwingwatch.org/category/organizations/judicial-watch
 
Back
Top