sunni on sunni civil war in Iraq

Really......................!

Well desh are you now saying the US should use the tactics that Saddam used to 'put a cork' in all the unrest in Iraq?:shock:
 
Battleborne said:
Well desh are you now saying the US should use the tactics that Saddam used to 'put a cork' in all the unrest in Iraq?:shock:
Click to expand...

Well it wouldn't be anything new in the sphere of foreign policy for the US, the UK or anybody else. In fact, in terms of Africa it's going to be the blueprint for access to natural resources.
 
I wonder...

Did our critical friends protest when BJ Clinton sent the US military to interfere in civil unrest in Bosnia and Somalia?

Were the warlords of Mogadishu or the ethnic cleansers a threat to America?

Selective outrage?

Saddam said he had WMD until we invaded, and nearly everyone believed him. Those who claim they didn't were damned few, and those who had any evidence to support their non-belief even fewer.

Should we have settled for "peace in our time"...
 
indisputable said:
Did our critical friends protest when BJ Clinton sent the US military to interfere in civil unrest in Bosnia and Somalia?

Were the warlords of Mogadishu or the ethnic cleansers a threat to America?

Selective outrage?

Saddam said he had WMD until we invaded, and nearly everyone believed him. Those who claim they didn't were damned few, and those who had any evidence to support their non-belief even fewer.

Should we have settled for "peace in our time"...
Click to expand...

No outrage really.

Let them sort it out themselves.

Did you hear Somalia considering direct action when the Gore/Bush election controversy was going on?

And for all this "peace in our time" shit - where the fuck were you poppet? Was America standing up for Czechoslovakia? Was the US willing to go to war over the invasion of Poland?

Admittedly this is all irrelevant, as most of us weren't actually alive. Which is why only some massive twat, completely ignorant of history, would seek to bring it up.
 
Last edited:
indisputable said:
Did our critical friends protest when BJ Clinton sent the US military to interfere in civil unrest in Bosnia and Somalia?

Were the warlords of Mogadishu or the ethnic cleansers a threat to America?

Selective outrage?

Saddam said he had WMD until we invaded, and nearly everyone believed him. Those who claim they didn't were damned few, and those who had any evidence to support their non-belief even fewer.

Should we have settled for "peace in our time"...
Click to expand...

No he fucking did not.

He was telling us he didnt have them.




http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/12/15/164814.shtml

Saddam Denies Having Prohibited Weapons
NewsMax Wires
Monday Dec. 15, 2003
WASHINGTON - Saddam Hussein has denied to his interrogators that his regime had weapons of mass destruction and ties to al-Qaida, U.S. officials said Monday.
He has greeted his initial interrogation with a mix of sarcasm and defiance, the officials said, discussing the questioning only on the condition of anonymity. Some of his responses are regarded as an attempt to rationalize and justify his actions, the officials said.

Saddam has complied with simple commands to stand up and sit down, but officials said he has not provided much useful information on the guerrilla war or other matters.

He has also denied knowledge of the fate of Scott Speicher, the Navy fighter pilot who disappeared over Iraq during the first Gulf War. Sen. Pat Roberts, R-Kan. and chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said Saddam denied taking any prisoners when asked about Speicher.

Saddam's denials match those of his regime before the most recent war. U.S. officials say the denials are expected, particularly in the early stages of an interrogation, before his interrogators establish a rapport with him.
 
Last edited:
Uhh Charv...............

charver said:
No outrage really.

Let them sort it out themselves.

Did you hear Somalia considering direct action when the Gore/Bush election controversy was going on?

And for all this "peace in our time" shit - where the fuck were you poppet? Was America standing up for Czechoslovakia? Was the US willing to go to war over the invasion of Poland?

Admittedly this is all irrelevant, as most of us weren't actually alive. Which is why only some massive twat, completely ignorant of history, would seek to bring it up.
Click to expand...


Since you brought up WWII...who do you think supplied,England,France,Russia et al supplies to fight the Third Reich...the U.S lost quite a few ships and personnel prior to Germany declaring war on the U.S,after their Ally Japan, bombed Pearl Harbor and declared war on the U.S...History 101 friend!
 
Battleborne said:
Since you brought up WWII...who do you think supplied,England,France,Russia et al supplies to fight the Third Reich...the U.S lost quite a few ships and personnel prior to Germany declaring war on the U.S,after their Ally Japan, bombed Pearl Harbor and declared war on the U.S...History 101 friend!
Click to expand...

BB, i'm not seeking to denigrate the assistance that the US gave us, and others, in fighting the Nazis.

What i am saying is that without our resistance and, perhaps more importantly the Soviets losing men in horrific numbers the US would likely be facing the prospect of Imperial Japan and a super-annuated Germany at the same time. The odds wouldn't have been good.

As i said WWII and the sacrifices of my grandparents and your parents(?) are not only irrelevant but downright derogatory when linked with Iraq.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top