Taliban Funeral Procession

C

Care4all

Junior Member
Contributor
Was it Bin Laden's? The photograph with the 300 dressed to the hilt Taliban leaders in their formal outfits and head dresses? How did those Taliban know that they would be safe when they knew they could have easily been wiped out by us? yet they attended this funeral of this "someone" ...supposedly high up?

so they did make this agreement that we would not take out the Taliban leaders at this cemetary as was being reported...s what conclusion I come to...but who was the funeral for?

For DAYS now, I have been questioning that "funeral" that we had Drone photos of, with the 300 or so Taliban Leaders attending....

Was it Bin Laden? Who else would draw soooooooooooo many Taliban leaders? Why were they ASSURED that we would not attack?

I am now hearing FOX mention this funeral this morning and speculating that it was Bin Laden's funeral....

:(:(:( And because I know they are the administration's PAWN, I don't know what to believe anymore....???

care
 
I still say bin laden is safely tucked away in iran.

The funneral was for some high ranking taliban leader. And it was stoopid not to take them all out. The cemetary rule is one of the stupidest things I have ever heard of.
 
That is a good question. maybe we will know some day. Some say it wasn't attacked because of an agreement with Karzi that we wouldn't attack such events and Rice made that agreement. If she did, I would like to know why. But I guess it is mostly specialation at this point.
 
But I wouldn't expect that the terrorist would want it known that he went out with a wimper, old and sick rather than dying with his boots on fighting the evil empire.
 
i don't think he would want to leave this world in that manner either Toby, and it would NOT be something to advertise, as you mentioned.

in other words, it is not necessarily a recruiting tool for the terrorists...or for president bush....

could be psyops, to smoke him out?

could be true, and the french spoiled it for the ''october surprise''?

I think the cemetary rule is right and just. :)

I just think that there is NO REASON why our special ops could not FOLLOW the leader heads that they were certain were present, and then take out the ''bad guys'' singularly, after leaving the procession?.....instead of haphazardly killing them along with all of those other people that we will label, ''collareral damage''. :(

shoot, i would have had a satelite zoned in on them, snapping away a picture a second and a handfull of drones, videotaping the disbursement...and for all we know they did gaffer and toby.....even MORE info could have been gotten from that than killing them in the cemetary....killing is NOT ALWAYS the best decision guys!!!!

care
 
Last edited:
I see your point Care, but I say anyone at an Al Queada funeral has no right to keep breathing.................LOL
 
Gaffer said:
I still say bin laden is safely tucked away in iran.
Click to expand...


WHY?

why would bin laden be in IRAN with shiites, the same shiites alqaeda in iraq are blowing themselves up daily to KILL?

alqaeda are supposedly helping the SUNNI in this battle in iraq.... are you saying that is not true?

care
 
US read the post, Gaff said that not me. But OBL's son and one of his wifes are in Iran, why wouldn't they take him when he is opposed to US power just like they are?

The point is this funeral and what wasn't done. Those people should have been blown to their just reward.
 
I was referring to just that post about blowing everyone away at the funeral. that ia an AQ or terrorist tactic not ours.
 
If you are morning a terrorist, then you are most likely a terrorist. Well, in Afghanstan anyway.
 
So all people at a mafia funeral would be mafia ?
Or all people at a gay persons funeral would be gay ?
You might be mostly right toby, but I still disagree with bombing a funeral.
 
Care4all said:
i don't think he would want to leave this world in that manner either Toby, and it would NOT be something to advertise, as you mentioned.

in other words, it is not necessarily a recruiting tool for the terrorists...or for president bush....

could be psyops, to smoke him out?

could be true, and the french spoiled it for the ''october surprise''?

I think the cemetary rule is right and just. :)


The cemetary rule is stupid. you don't fight a war by letting the enemy gather to pay their respects. especially if they are all leaders and officers. empathy for your enemy will just get you killed.


I just think that there is NO REASON why our special ops could not FOLLOW the leader heads that they were certain were present, and then take out the ''bad guys'' singularly, after leaving the procession?.....instead of haphazardly killing them along with all of those other people that we will label, ''collareral damage''. :(


The reason they could not follow them is they got into different vehicles and headed out in 40 different directions. There would not be enough drones around to follow them and satelite positioning for individuals is not posible. The only people there were taliban and al quada, There would have been no innocents, though it would have been reported that 200 innocents were killed at a funneral.


shoot, i would have had a satelite zoned in on them, snapping away a picture a second and a handfull of drones, videotaping the disbursement...and for all we know they did gaffer and toby.....even MORE info could have been gotten from that than killing them in the cemetary....killing is NOT ALWAYS the best decision guys!!!!


I am sure they followed at least some of them. But how do you determine which ones to follow. Its not like they have flags with generals stars on their vehicles. The real world doesn't work like the movies. you don't just move things in instantly and start taking pictures or positioning satelites. This was a real missed opportunity.


care
Click to expand...

In a case like this killing is the best decision.
 
Last edited:
Maybe you think that way US but I don't. But a funeral in Afghanstan for a terrorist would most likely be terrorist. Not the same as a funeral in NY is it? And why not kill them when you find them? Only certain places you can kill someone who is out to kill you? At least it wouldn't kill any women or children because they are not allowed to mingle with the men. LOL
 
uscitizen said:
So all people at a mafia funeral would be mafia ?
Or all people at a gay persons funeral would be gay ?
You might be mostly right toby, but I still disagree with bombing a funeral.
Click to expand...

Not good analogies. Look at the area. All of them would have been supporters if not members of the taliban or al quada.
 
Care4all said:
WHY?

why would bin laden be in IRAN with shiites, the same shiites alqaeda in iraq are blowing themselves up daily to KILL?

alqaeda are supposedly helping the SUNNI in this battle in iraq.... are you saying that is not true?

care
Click to expand...

because they both have the same goals. He might not get the respect and honor that he would like but he's on the same page as they are. Destroy the US and Israel and take down the west. After they have achieved their goals they will turn on each other like mad dogs.

They will give him safe haven as long as he continues to plot against the US.

We were allied with Russia against Hitler in WW2. But we weren't friends. Just had a mutual enemy. Works the same in islam. The secular fighting in iraq is just to get dominace over the area. Which iran wants very bad. bin laden is not going to have much say over all that. But I am sure he's waiting his opportunity.
 
toby, give a link on that obl son scoop, of the son being in iran with the wifey, if it is readily avail to you....or tell me where to look, and i will find it!

that is news to me....?

care
 
Didn't we give our word not to do it though Toby ?
Pick on whomever gave their word for us not to attack funerals.
 
Gaffer said:
because they both have the same goals. He might not get the respect and honor that he would like but he's on the same page as they are. Destroy the US and Israel and take down the west. After they have achieved their goals they will turn on each other like mad dogs.

They will give him safe haven as long as he continues to plot against the US.

We were allied with Russia against Hitler in WW2. But we weren't friends. Just had a mutual enemy. Works the same in islam. The secular fighting in iraq is just to get dominace over the area. Which iran wants very bad. bin laden is not going to have much say over all that. But I am sure he's waiting his opportunity.
Click to expand...

GAFFER! this is the SAME garbage that WAS FED TO US via the repubs in charge with saddam and alqaeda that WAS PROVEN TO BE WRONG, and is PRECISELY WHY we are in the QUAGMIRE we are in today in Iraq!

STOP IT!

DON'T let THEM do this to us and most importantly to YOU again.....please LEARN from YOUR MISTAKES, please research the likelyhood of iran siding with obl/alqaeda, when alqaeda IS KILLING the shiites, their brothers and sisters, in iraq!

they will not side together and AGAINST us, just like SADDAM DID NOT join with alqaeda at the time.... their hatred towards us, stayed SEPARATE!

care
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top